Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 24 Nov 2007 (Saturday) 17:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

FF SLR 1Ds/5d question

 
mogearnotalent
Senior Member
771 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Nov 24, 2007 17:32 |  #1

heres where I'm confused if both of these full frame SLRs are being mareketed torwards wedding and landscape photographers, how does this make sense, as the wedding /portrait people need narrow DOF and I would presume a landscape photographer would need a wide DOF. sorry to ask such basic questions
TIA




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Nov 24, 2007 17:36 |  #2

DoF's only one of the concerns. The FF bodies give you the opportunity for much wider angle of view than the crop bodies do. They also offer more pixels than the comparable crop bodies at a given angle of view.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lightstream
Yoda
14,915 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Cult of the Full Frame
     
Nov 25, 2007 06:31 |  #3

And dynamic range. It's tremendously subjective, but even with highlight tone priority I find it much tougher to control DR on my 40D compared to my 5D. The 5D just keeps tickin' no matter how tough the lighting is....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fWord
Goldmember
Avatar
2,637 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Nov 25, 2007 07:25 as a reply to  @ Lightstream's post |  #4

The key phrase here is perhaps 'DOF control', rather than just 'DOF' alone.

A FF SLR will offer you the ability to have more DOF control compared to a APS-C camera. In the same vein, a camera with an APS-C sized sensor will offer you the ability for more DOF control than a P&S camera.

This means that it is easier to get a narrower DOF and thus more developed background blur or 'bokeh' when using a FF SLR compared to an APS-C SLR.

Of course this is oversimplifying things, but I don't want to get into the awful bits on perspective, magnification, and the like.


LightWorks Portfolio (external link)
Night Photography Tutorial: Basics & Minutiae (external link)
Gear List (Past & Present)
The Art of Composition IS the Art of Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mogearnotalent
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
771 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Nov 25, 2007 10:28 |  #5

so to clarify, because of its design, FF is easier to create narow DOF than with crop, however wide DOF is still possible with enough light and proper aperture




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fWord
Goldmember
Avatar
2,637 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Nov 25, 2007 18:42 |  #6

mogearnotalent wrote in post #4381445 (external link)
so to clarify, because of its design, FF is easier to create narow DOF than with crop, however wide DOF is still possible with enough light and proper aperture

Put simply, I guess that's the general idea. We'll let the technical ones chime in with their stuff.


LightWorks Portfolio (external link)
Night Photography Tutorial: Basics & Minutiae (external link)
Gear List (Past & Present)
The Art of Composition IS the Art of Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MagentaJoe
psycho clown
Avatar
1,357 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Having breakfast at the circus, with the lions and the clowns.
     
Nov 25, 2007 19:16 |  #7

My widest lens is the 50/1.4 and I can get dof narrowed down to just a few mm and with a smaller aperture for landscapes I have no trouble getting everything in focus. The same was true for the XT when I had it. I think the difference in depth of field between crop and ff, in practice, isn't really a big issue. It's more about the size of the sensor effecting your angle of view and perspective when taking landscape type shots.


Arguing with a psycho clown can be harmful to your funny bone.
5D-Grip, 40D, 35f2, 50f1.4, 85f1.8,100f2.8macro, 135f2.8sf, 17-40f4L, 24-70f2.8L, 100-400f4.5-5.6isL, 580ex, 420ex, 430ex, 430ez
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=442750

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JMHPhotography
Goldmember
Avatar
4,784 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2005
Location: New Hampshire
     
Nov 25, 2007 22:18 |  #8

I think you're confusing DOF with AOV or mixing the two together when they are mutally exclusive things. DOF can only be shallow or deep. AOV is wide or narrow. You can have a wide AOV with a shallow DOF or a narrow AOV with a deep DOF. AOV is angle of view for those who didn't know.


~John

(aka forkball)
Have a peek into my Gearbag. and My flickr (external link)
editing of my photos by permission only. Thanks

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,552 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
FF SLR 1Ds/5d question
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1161 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.