Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 24 Nov 2007 (Saturday) 23:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Another 50/1.4 vs 85/1.2 Question!

 
Zeeshan0518
Member
127 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Fremont, CA
     
Nov 24, 2007 23:37 |  #1

So....I been reading a lot of threads on how the 1.2 has a hard time focusing.

I do mainly night club photography and currently use a 24-70 with 580ex . I talk to a lot of photographers and they have told me to pick up a prime. Some say to do a 1.2 while others say go 50/1.4. I was going to pick up the 1.2 - but then read a lot of threads saying its really hard to focus.

My night club i currently shoot at is extremely dark - so even though i think the subject is in pure focus - the subject comes out blurry.

So....where do i go from here? So confused on which lens to pick!

Zee


Make Sure To Hit Up:
http://www.iloveclubin​.com (external link)
http://www.myspace.com​/mr_zeeshan (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,568 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Nov 24, 2007 23:40 |  #2

I don't think the 85 f1.2 has a tough time focusing...it's just that the large aperture often makes it difficult to nail the focus because of the very narrow DOF. When it comes to this, the 50 1.4 isn't much better...they both have a VERY thin DOF when shot wide open. Of course, in a dark environment, your blurry subjects may not be due to bad focus but slow shutter speeds.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
terriyaki
Senior Member
Avatar
528 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Nov 25, 2007 00:20 |  #3

I think you have the 85/1.2 mixed up with the 50/1.2


X100S | 5D | 35 | 85 | 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
10,206 posts
Likes: 1413
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Nov 25, 2007 05:11 |  #4

for the low cost i would pick up a 50f1.4 and try it im happy with mine ,you can always sell it again with little loss.
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kris_2020
Senior Member
Avatar
516 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada, Ontario
     
Nov 25, 2007 08:19 as a reply to  @ GyRob's post |  #5

I can tell you that the 85 f1.2 has no problems focusing in low light. As a matter of fact I tried focusing in a pitch black room with only the Cameras LCD light and the AF assist beam from the 580 EX II and had no problems focusing.


Canon 5D IV | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS L Mark 2 | Canon 85mm f/1.8 | 580 EX II
_______________
Flickr Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaunknee
Senior Member
Avatar
640 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Toronto
     
Nov 25, 2007 08:24 |  #6

I've owned both and the 50L has marginally better focusing in low light. It definitely focuses faster. The 85L is optically better.


1DS2, 1DX, 24-70II, 70-200 2.8 IS II ,100 Macro, 1.4X, 430 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Nov 25, 2007 08:26 |  #7

Zeeshan0518 wrote in post #4379647 (external link)
So....I been reading a lot of threads on how the 1.2 has a hard time focusing.

I do mainly night club photography and currently use a 24-70 with 580ex . I talk to a lot of photographers and they have told me to pick up a prime. Some say to do a 1.2 while others say go 50/1.4. I was going to pick up the 1.2 - but then read a lot of threads saying its really hard to focus.

My night club i currently shoot at is extremely dark - so even though i think the subject is in pure focus - the subject comes out blurry.

So....where do i go from here? So confused on which lens to pick!

The question that I have is whether or not you intend to shoot with available light or still use the flash.

If you are going to continue to use flash and the lens you are currently using is working well for you, forget what "a lot of photographers" tell you. They may not have a clue as to what you need to accomplish your task.

If you intend to work without flash, then you need to make some test measurements - preferably with a good handheld meter. You need to determine what shutter speeds you could use at apertures wider than f/2.8 (or whatever the max aperture for your 24-70 is - you didn't say which 24-70). Would those shutter speeds be suitable for your needs? Then, you need to determine whether or not the reduced depth of field using the very wide apertures would be acceptable.

On top of all that, you are asking about two very different focal lengths. Only your experience will tell you what focal length(s) would work for your situation.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Nov 25, 2007 08:53 |  #8

Also, IMO both 50mm and 85mm will be way too long for nightclub photography. (Assuming (semi) posed group shots). You need a wide lens and flash for that IMO.

Zeeshan0518 wrote in post #4379647 (external link)
so even though i think the subject is in pure focus - the subject comes out blurry.

Post an example.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,970 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13438
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Nov 25, 2007 08:59 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #9

I shoot candids in sometimes very tight environments and my wides get a workout. I think Rene' hit the nail on the head. I shoot with 5Ds and in tight situations the 24 1.4 and the 35 1.4 are the only workable choice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

965 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Another 50/1.4 vs 85/1.2 Question!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1612 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.