Group hug round 2?

izthistaken Cream of the Crop 6,857 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Warren, MI More info | Sep 10, 2010 08:21 | #8176 Group hug round 2? Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rohicks Goldmember 1,834 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Jacksonville, FL (Northside) More info | beano wrote in post #10883932 Critique is just personal opinion, and has nothing to do with how many photo's you post!?! I personally critique on these forums far more than i post photo's. Cathpah wrote in post #10883965 I've stayed out of this until now....but I gotta say, it's you who looks like the bad guy right now. Sure his critique wasn't positive, but frankly....I find that to be the most helpful. If you want only praise, go post it on your mother's refrigerator. If you're going to post it here....realize that you may get some criticisms. Those are meant to help you improve that image, as well as not make a similar mistake in the future. You now swiping at his skill-level because he found something that he didn't like in your photos? Lame. Sure, he may not be as experienced/talented as you may hope...but that doesn't mean he can't see a fault in someone elses picture. If all you're doing is looking for praise, post elsewhere. This is a forum where people can and should be honest. I know I'd vastly prefer criticism/ways to improve than a bunch of ego stroking. One will help me get better at photography, the other will feel like a simulated pat on the back. If i was looking for praise then I wouldn't of agree with it dumbass. rohicks wrote in post #10878756 I actually could see that being a problem i'll edit it later tonight. Thanks. Nowhere did I say even from his first post about the clock that his "critique" was a pointless observation. "I found it laughable" as you can check my post that someone would point that out and then everyone acted like i "jumped down his throat" insulting him when all i said was "srlsy". Maybe instead of "srlsy" I should of put "that is laughable". TMR Design wrote in post #10883976 Where is the rule that says you have to love every image that is posted? Where is the rule that says you have to post images in order to comment or critique others? Are we now trying to qualify everyone that comments or posts? Why are comments and nitpicks spun into some horrible insult rather than just seeing them for what they are.... opinion and preference, and yes, useful information to consider. There are actually some people around here that know a lot more than others and perhaps the naive people are the ones that don't open themselves up to the possibility that they might just learn something. It's quite hypocritical for some to come here and judge everyone's photo when he has nothing post himself. There are no rules except for what the admins or mods enforce. Ryan O. Hicks
LOG IN TO REPLY |
phamster Cream of the Crop 6,315 posts Likes: 51 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Purdue - Go Boilers More info | Sep 10, 2010 08:27 | #8178 @ Matt.. haha.. "Lighting will make or break your photo"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cathpah Goldmember 4,259 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maine. More info | Sep 10, 2010 08:40 | #8179 rohicks wrote in post #10884010 If i was looking for praise then I wouldn't of agree with it dumbass. Dumbass? Yeah....one more round of your proving yourself of how much respect you give and deserve. Architecture
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rohicks Goldmember 1,834 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Jacksonville, FL (Northside) More info | Sep 10, 2010 08:41 | #8180 Cathpah wrote in post #10884076 Dumbass? Yeah....one more round of your proving yourself and how much respect you give and deserve. That was my one and only post on the subject and never was I disrespectful, rude, or combative. I basically told you to calm down. Back off, grow up, and gain some perspective. I was trying to be civil until you chimed in with ignorant statements. Ryan O. Hicks
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | Sep 10, 2010 08:47 | #8181 rohicks wrote in post #10884088 Taking your own advice would suffice as well. So far you're the only one that insists on referring to others as an 'annoying little gnat' and then as a dumbass, and you seem to want to qualify people before they can comment on your images. It doesn't work that way. For all you know, a person making a comment that has never posted an image could be a brilliant photographer that had a 40 year career and no longer shoots but enjoys the company of other photographers. Maybe it's someone with an injury that is unable to shoot but has a wealth of information and knowledge. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cathpah Goldmember 4,259 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maine. More info | Sep 10, 2010 08:47 | #8182 rohicks wrote in post #10884088 I was trying to be civil until you chimed in with ignorant statements. Taking your own advice would suffice as well. What about my statement was ignorant or incorrect? Was it the part where I admitted his critique wasn't positive? That critique should be seen as helfpul? Or that you were swiping at his skill? Architecture
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ckfishel2001 Goldmember 2,297 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Cincinnati More info | Sep 10, 2010 08:55 | #8183 So, on the instruction end, the tread is one light, so I assume you lit her with one light. She seems very even in her lighting. If I may ask, what kind of light, modifier, and distance did you use to get that? Kevin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cathpah Goldmember 4,259 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maine. More info | Sep 10, 2010 08:59 | #8184 ckfishel2001 wrote in post #10884149 So, on the instruction end, the tread is one light, so I assume you lit her with one light. She seems very even in her lighting. If I may ask, what kind of light, modifier, and distance did you use to get that? This one was actually a maxi-lite with a gold deflector (poor-man's gel to compensate for reddening of the sky in sunset) and a grid. There's a chance I had taken the grid off by then, but I just can't be sure. This was all attached to a ranger rx speed as-->lightpole-->assistant....probably about 20-25 feet away, camera left and high. Architecture
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | You can see from the catch light in the eye and directionality of the shadow on the ground that the light is above and to the left of the subject. It would appear to be a nice large light source that is probably just out of frame, creating very even light. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | Sep 10, 2010 09:02 | #8186 Cathpah wrote in post #10884175 This one was actually a maxi-lite with a gold deflector (poor-man's gel to compensate for reddening of the sky in sunset) and a grid. There's a chance I had taken the grid off by then, but I just can't be sure. This was all attached to a ranger rx speed as-->lightpole-->assistant....probably about 20-25 feet away, camera left and high. My assistant was more than crucial on this shoot as the winds were truly insane. Rooftops are always windy, but the even forecast for the day was just "windy." While holding the deep octa earlier, I saw fear in his eyes as it turned into a sail and looked as though it was going to lift him off the ground (and he's 180lbs or so). Hey Jeff, Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ckfishel2001 Goldmember 2,297 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Cincinnati More info | Sep 10, 2010 09:05 | #8187 TMR Design wrote in post #10884177 You can see from the catch light in the eye and directionality of the shadow on the ground that the light is above and to the left of the subject. It would appear to be a nice large light source that is probably just out of frame, creating very even light. Jeff can of course correct me ![]() OOPS: Jeff beat me to it.
Kevin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cathpah Goldmember 4,259 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maine. More info | Sep 10, 2010 09:26 | #8188 TMR Design wrote in post #10884193 Hey Jeff, I'm not sure if you've noticed this but I've found a real love for gold deflectors and sold or sunfire reflectors when working with women of color and those with dark skin. I really love it and I see you're getting the same beautiful skin tones with your model. haha....nope, that was not by chance at all. I would've likely been using the gold deflector on her whenever possible for that very reason. In general, I'm very hesitant to use gold reflectors (either the fold-up kind, or the deflector kind) as I think it can be a bit artificial/fake looking....however beautiful dark skin like that just eats it up (in all the right ways). ckfishel2001 wrote in post #10884222 I got the left from the shadow, but my shadow reading still needs some perfecting Didn't catch the high part. Think I'm starting to see in the shadow how you'd know that. With the deflector, where'd you get that placed....and who had the joy of holding that in the wind?Give it time....shadows, direction, and characteristics of light will soon be all you see. The number of times that my wife catches me staring off into the distance at some "intriguing light" is downright embarrassing. Architecture
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | Sep 10, 2010 09:29 | #8189 Cathpah wrote in post #10884313 EDIT: oh, and thank goodness the light was coming from the left, because if it was coming from the right that would've meant my assistant was falling off the building, and his girlfriend would've been really unhappy with me. LOLOL Funny stuff Jeff. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pantherphotos Goldmember 1,314 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Marysville, WA More info | Sep 10, 2010 09:55 | #8190 pantherphotos wrote in post #10878742 It's a great image, Ryan, except the black line coming out of her head at the top is very distracting to me. ![]() Sorry couldn't help it, seeing the scuffle that happened earlier! LOL I am completely joking, btw! I was gone for a week, and come back to trolling this thread, and there is the drama from the hands of the clock being mentioned. Way too funny! Yours and Pham's images are definitely an inspiration to me and I hope to get to that level some day! I just couldn't help stirring the pot a little! ![]() ![]() :pI want to apologize for starting POTN World War III. I was simply trying to be funny...I tend to respond to tense situations with humor. I was not intending to be critical in any way, nor was I wanting to start the feud back up. I just want y'all to know that, since it could be perceived I was doing that. I honestly did not think the bickering would start up again! Eric
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1187 guests, 120 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||