I'm looking for car shots taken inside a commercial parking garage, not your home garage. Exif in tact, or posted along with the image would be appreciated.
Hopefully we can gather a nice collection here, rather than a vague search. TIA
hawk911 Cream of the Crop  More info | Nov 26, 2007 14:57 | #1 I'm looking for car shots taken inside a commercial parking garage, not your home garage. Exif in tact, or posted along with the image would be appreciated. HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bdpAKAknox Senior Member  282 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: So Cal More info | Nov 26, 2007 17:32 | #2 |
Nov 26, 2007 18:50 | #3 nice shot; thanks. HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
VorteC Senior Member  550 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Nov 26, 2007 18:53 | #4 not mine but it's my friends ride. I like the pics.
 ♠ ELAN SHI | PHOTOGRAPHY
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 26, 2007 18:59 | #5 do you know anything about the second shot? Were there any flash units, or other vehicle headlights on the walls? Looks like quite a bit of light on the background walls. HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eryk Goldmember  2,055 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2005 More info | Nov 26, 2007 19:40 | #6  Canon EOS 5Dmk3 //
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 26, 2007 19:42 | #7 Eryk, what was the basic exposure- the +0. Nice HDR too, BTW HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 26, 2007 20:41 | #9 Holster- nice shot. Can I ask why you chose iso 100 and F3.5? Seems a bit shallow DOF and you certainly had room on the iso range. HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 27, 2007 00:21 | #10 im new at photography. im still figuring out all the setting to work on my camera. i was under the impresion that Iso100 gives you the least grainy image, and F3.5 gives you more focus on the closer objects. i didnt really want to have any focus on the background so the car would stand out even more because white doesnt seem to jump naturaly. but if you have any advise im down for anything. PM me so we dont thread jack
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 27, 2007 08:35 | #11 no- this thread is both to show what you've done, and help others understand how to do it. To me the F3.5 is a bit shallow, and you could have stopped down to F8 or even F11 and use a tripod to eliminate any shake. The exposure will be much longer, in the seconds range, but who cares if you have a tripod. HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DORIFT Member  59 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Auckland, New Zealand More info | Nov 27, 2007 17:06 | #13
DRAW Photography - http://www.drawphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 27, 2007 17:07 | #14 Nice shot ^. Can you post the exif? HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BobTilton Member 157 posts Joined Nov 2007 More info | Nov 27, 2007 20:25 | #15 Fantastic shot! Well done!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is AlainPre 1743 guests, 159 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
