Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 01 Dec 2007 (Saturday) 19:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Black's Photography Prints -- Hideous.

 
DanteCaspian
Goldmember
1,103 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
     
Dec 01, 2007 19:40 |  #1

:confused:

First time using Black's Photography to do my prints. Typically I don't print or if I do I use a home inkjet or a colour laser at work with good results. I know B&W has been tricky in the past for me as colours are used to blend the tones of gray, or so I have been told, thus I had some B&W high key photos printed at Black's today, they turned out hideous!

I called and they will redo, but before I go back to Black's to work with the staff to get the photos the way I and my client need them, maybe a suggestion or two from some wise folks?

The portrait photos (4 .jpegs) are all black and white. They are all far too dark and have a red hue... one, that is largely mid tones, is nearly all pink.
I am surprised the staff did not notice or question!

When talking with the lady on the phone and explaining, she said something to the effect of converting them to B&W when they do it again. They are B&W! Two are simply converted to 8bit B&W mode, the other 2 were created with B&W mask in PS. So I am not sure about that.

I have viewed them on 4 monitors my self, 2 of which are calibrated. Others viewing, including the client do not see any red tones or brightness/contrast issues.

Thoughts?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DanteCaspian
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,103 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
     
Dec 01, 2007 22:59 |  #2

My bother suggested the following,

_______________
The problem is reciprocity failure inherent in colour photo chemistry and paper. Trying to get monochrome images on colour paper requires that all 3 colour channels be perfectly balanced AT ALL EXPOSURE LEVELS. This is hard to do because the colour response curves of the printing paper are non-linear and not equal. So you highlighs and lowlights will not track to perfect grayscale values, no matter how well everything is calibrated. This has been my experience in the past. I don't know why or if the technology of photofinishing has not caught up to deal with this problem. You might want to ask the people who did the finishing for you on that point. But as far as I know, the most direct and fool-proof way to get a B&W print is to use B&W paper.

Rick
_______________




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brikwall
Senior Member
840 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlantic Canada
     
Dec 02, 2007 06:27 |  #3

DanteCaspian wrote in post #4422944 (external link)
But as far as I know, the most direct and fool-proof way to get a B&W print is to use B&W paper.

Perhaps, but you should be able to get good black and white images from home printers as well as photolabs.

For a while I was shooting a lot of Kodak BW400CN film, which is a black and white film that can be processed at any C-41 colour lab. Because most of these labs don't bother colour correcting individual images or rolls, I had to be careful and specify that I wanted black and white and not sepia. If left untouched, I would indeed get a sepia colour cast. However, once they were warned to "colour correct or else," I did get some pure black and white images from colour processing and colour paper.

One thing to keep in mind is that many photo labs - Blacks, Wal-Mart, Jean Coutu, Costco, etc, process so many films (digital files), and stick to that 1-hour promise, that they can't individually colour correct each film or image. Their equipment is set for an average colour and density which will make most prints look half-decent but none perfect. If you have special instructions or concerns you should either make them clear when you drop off the film (digital files), or find a professional lab that will colour correct every image. The pro labs will be more expensive, but you'll be much more pleased with the results.

Another option is to embed a custom ICC profile in your images, specific to the machine the lab uses. You can get the ICC profiles for Noritsu machines at http://www.drycreekpho​to.com/Frontier/Fronti​erDatabase.htm (external link). While the website provides data for Costco locations, most other commercial labs use the same equipment and papers. Just find out what your local Blacks is using and then embed the appropriate ICC profile.


Dan
Some gear, some experience, and no talent.
Web: http://www.macdonald-photography.com (external link) | http://ambientlight.ze​nfolio.com (external link) |
http://danmacdonald.50​0px.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dchemist
Goldmember
1,632 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Woodbury, Connecticut
     
Dec 02, 2007 11:12 as a reply to  @ Brikwall's post |  #4

If you want images printed on traditional BW paper, you can go through a lab like http://www.dalmatianla​b.com/ (external link). I have had them produce several prints on fiber paper and they were execllent - blacks were truely black but they are expensive. They offer a less expensive RC print which I have not tried. They are using Ilford papers. Good luck Dennis


POTN Book Vol4 Astronomy Image Manager and BC Member
20D, 5DMkII, 50F1.4, 100F2.8 macro, 135F2, 17-40F4, 70-200F2.8, 24-105F4, 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Dec 02, 2007 11:16 |  #5

Ok first off the guy is in Canada. Many online labs don't ship to the North Pole.

You need to understand they use sRGB and JPG for colour correction. Send the files ot them in that format and you'll get better colour representation.

Or go to Costco where you can download their profiles and proof the colour yourself.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bill0199
Junior Member
Avatar
21 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
     
Dec 06, 2007 13:36 as a reply to  @ cosworth's post |  #6

What Jason said. Try saving a colour photo from photoshop in rgb colourspace. Then save a copy in Srgb. When viewing with Windows viewer you probably won't see a difference. Open them both with explorer and you will. I was not converting to srgb profile when sending to Blacks and I was getting prints back that looked like the RGB colourspace photo when viewed in explorer (srgb). Convert to profile srgb before uploading to Blacks. This may be the same for B&W but not sure as I've not checked it. I'm using COSTCO now with the ICC profiles at DryCreeekphoto. Great results.


30D
50mm 1.8 MKII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DanteCaspian
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,103 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
     
Dec 06, 2007 20:22 |  #7

Thank you very much everyone!

I got them back from Blacks last night. They got them right this time. The girl gave me some tips as to how to have B&W or pro stuff done with them.
When I asked another sales person if there equipment is calibrated... confusion was in the eyes. ;)
I can say for certain, the kiosk system is not calibrated, the one girl giving me tips eluded to this as well, she advised I have my stuff taken directly to the back room.

In any case, I will take the suggestions and advise you all offered and stuggle much less in the future!

I LOVE POTN

-Dante




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
n10tmax
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Oct 2010
     
Apr 27, 2013 14:38 as a reply to  @ DanteCaspian's post |  #8

When in Photoshop go to Image, Mode and then Grayscale. If your prints are still in srgb or adobe rgb they may look black and white but they are still in essence colour photos. The other option if you are at Black's is the go to options; print, edit, crop and then on the top of the screen you will see convert to black and white. Or you can ask that the images be converted to monochrome by the staff when they are printing. This will happen at most labs as their machines will see the images as colour if you have not converted them to Grayscale.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DanteCaspian
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,103 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
     
May 14, 2013 07:02 |  #9

They were true grey scale.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
May 14, 2013 13:36 |  #10

What profile?
I'd convert to sRGB before sending in.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
May 15, 2013 11:53 |  #11

Dchemist wrote in post #4425320 (external link)
If you want images printed on traditional BW paper, you can go through a lab like http://www.dalmatianla​b.com/ (external link).

wow. these guys are local to me, in NC. good to see them represented on the board.

it's been a while since i used them but just looked them up the other day. The have been in business for a long time, at least since i was in photog school, 1993.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,601 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Black's Photography Prints -- Hideous.
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1703 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.