irish1 Senior Member 277 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Arizona More info | Dec 04, 2007 12:26 | #1 . . . is the Canon 17-55 IS than my Sigma 17-70? I'm looking to upgrade either this combo or my 70-200 f/4 for the 2.8 IS. I use the Sigma much more than my 70-200 but I'm more satisfied with the Sigma than I am the f/4. Anyone help me out here about which to upgrade first? Anything I'm not taking into consideration? Thanks Canon 40D, Sigma 17-70, Sigma 10-20, nifty 50, 50 1.4, 85 1.8, 70-200 4L, 70-200 f/2.8 IS, 430 EX, Manfrotto monopod, tripod and ball head, Tamrac MAS system
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart  24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Dec 04, 2007 12:31 | #2 Being that you are using the 17-xx range much more than the tele, I would try to get the best for that range.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support-  15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Dec 04, 2007 12:57 | #3 Check out some of the reviews at fredmiranda.com. [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2126 guests, 159 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
| 