How many copyright their photos? I know I haven't but I know that I really should and I plan to very soon.
Anyone else thinking of or already doing this?
NiL,
NILOLIGIST Goldmember 2,131 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2003 Location: New York City More info | Sep 03, 2004 20:07 | #1 How many copyright their photos? I know I haven't but I know that I really should and I plan to very soon. Canon 1D Mark II, 24-70 f/2.8L, 17-40 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L. 580EX, 4 - Alien Bees, Gitzo Tripod, Bogen Monopod.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DigitalProphet Senior Member 538 posts Joined Apr 2004 Location: Houston, Texas More info | Sep 03, 2004 20:29 | #2 I have not yet sent my images in for Copyright. But I do plan to now that I have just gotten my DBA and plan to start shooting for cash. Canon 300D, Canon 5D and some glass and some stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HarrySettle Senior Member 663 posts Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bemidji, MN More info | Sep 03, 2004 21:14 | #3 Interesting. I wasn't aware that you had to go through a process in order to copyright your images. I have always been under the impression that your work was protected under a slightly different rule of copyright that covers artistic work.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DigitalProphet Senior Member 538 posts Joined Apr 2004 Location: Houston, Texas More info | Sep 03, 2004 21:38 | #4 It is true that your work is technically copyrighted from the time you create. In fact, speaking of current work, any photo you take is copyrighted from the date of it creation for the duration of your lifetime plus seventy years unless it is formally injected into the public domain by written statement. Canon 300D, Canon 5D and some glass and some stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Conk Goldmember 3,368 posts Joined Jul 2002 Location: Cloverdale B.C. More info | Sep 04, 2004 11:44 | #5 NILOLIGIST wrote: How many copyright their photos? I know I haven't but I know that I really should and I plan to very soon. Anyone else thinking of or already doing this? NiL, In this original question you ask are you referring to putting a copyright on a printed image? Cloverdale Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DigitalProphet Senior Member 538 posts Joined Apr 2004 Location: Houston, Texas More info | Sep 04, 2004 13:06 | #6 I didn't even think about that. Canon 300D, Canon 5D and some glass and some stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HarrySettle Senior Member 663 posts Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bemidji, MN More info | Sep 06, 2004 18:51 | #7 The printers in my area assume that if the photo has a stamp with the name of a photo studio, or photographer, that there is a copyright issue involved. I plan to stamp, the back, of my proofs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
defordphoto MKIII Aficionado 9,888 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2002 Location: Pacific Northwest More info | Sep 06, 2004 18:56 | #8 If someone pays for my photos, I will not deface the photo itself. A stamp/sticker whatever on the back, but nada on the photo itself. If they want to scan it after that, then that's their option. I have no control over that, even with a small sig in the corner. defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HarrySettle Senior Member 663 posts Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bemidji, MN More info | Sep 07, 2004 21:26 | #9 RFMSports wrote: If someone pays for my photos, I will not deface the photo itself. A stamp/sticker whatever on the back, but nada on the photo itself. If they want to scan it after that, then that's their option. I have no control over that, even with a small sig in the corner. In my world, if a customer pays for a photo, they deserve a clean, perfect photograph. However, if they want it personally signed, I'd be more than happy to oblige, which I have done on more than one occasion. 8) On the other hand, if you are in the photo sales business such as wedding or portraits, you could be losing hundreds of dollars in sales for each customer that comes in the door, if you don't protect your images.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JLSPhoto Member 165 posts Joined Sep 2004 More info | Sep 08, 2004 11:38 | #10 Digital Prophet wrote: It is true that your work is technically copyrighted from the time you create. In fact, speaking of current work, any photo you take is copyrighted from the date of it creation for the duration of your lifetime plus seventy years unless it is formally injected into the public domain by written statement. But, and there is always a but, you are going to have a hard time seeking damages if you don't have a Federal Certificate of Registration. And copyright lawsuits are in fact federal cases, and as such are VERY expensive. So unless you have a CoR most lawyers won't take the case. But if they do you have a pretty good chance of settling if you can prove copyright ownership since it is cheaper to settle than fight. That is that. Or as much of that as I have come to understand it. Besides, $30 isn't too big a dent considering that you don't have to send 18meg files. You can fit alot of reasonably sized images on a CD. Or set of CD's. As I said I plan to start registering my works. I am thinking that I will file either on a 3 or 6 month cycle. Depending on the level of activity that is. - Digital Prophet - Nice summary, DP, and accurate.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
defordphoto MKIII Aficionado 9,888 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2002 Location: Pacific Northwest More info | Sep 08, 2004 13:33 | #11 Harry Settle wrote: RFMSports wrote: If someone pays for my photos, I will not deface the photo itself. A stamp/sticker whatever on the back, but nada on the photo itself. If they want to scan it after that, then that's their option. I have no control over that, even with a small sig in the corner. In my world, if a customer pays for a photo, they deserve a clean, perfect photograph. However, if they want it personally signed, I'd be more than happy to oblige, which I have done on more than one occasion. 8) On the other hand, if you are in the photo sales business such as wedding or portraits, you could be losing hundreds of dollars in sales for each customer that comes in the door, if you don't protect your images. A sig in the corner does nothing. If they want to scan it they will. A quick PS band-aid and that sig is gone. You only have so much control and if you start to make your sig/protection to large, then people will walk. That's why I just don't put anything on a purchased photo, except for a label/stamp on the back. defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dirk-39 Hatchling 1 post Joined Feb 2004 More info | Oct 29, 2004 02:50 | #12 hoi,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robertwgross Cream of the Crop 9,462 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2002 Location: California More info | Oct 29, 2004 17:07 | #13 Dirk, it is for that very reason why I never put any high-resolution image on my web site.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IndyJeff Goldmember 1,892 posts Likes: 9 Joined Oct 2003 Location: Indianapolis, IN More info | Oct 29, 2004 21:17 | #14 Dirk, first question, do you have the images copyrighted? If so, it doesn't matter what country you live in or what country the offending party lives in, it is still your property and most countries are acceptable to honoring copyrights of other nations. On shooting sports...If you see it happen then you didn't get it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1693 guests, 139 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||