Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 10 Dec 2007 (Monday) 04:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Trouble with manual focus 300mm F4L IS at long distance.

 
cookie99
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
     
Dec 10, 2007 04:49 |  #1

I have recently been trying to get good shots of some Ospreys, Swamp Harriers and other large raptors in flight at distances of between 200 and 500 yards.

I am using the 300mm F4 IS plus 1.4X converter and I find it almost impossible to use auto focus on these birds in flight so I have gone over to manual focus.

My problem is, I set the lens on infinity and use F8 and around 500sec but the focus is all wrong, what am I doing wrong.

What is infinity on this lens with the 1.4X? and am I missing something important.

Any suggestions gratefully received.


Chris Cooke "Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni"
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jman13
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,567 posts
Likes: 164
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Columbus, OH
     
Dec 10, 2007 05:30 |  #2

Are you sure you're focusing on infinity and not BEYOND infinity? Lenses can focus beyond infinity to compensate for changes in temperature, or for shooting infrared film, which requires a different focus plane to get things in focus.


Jordan Steele - http://www.jsteelephot​os.com (external link) | https://www.admiringli​ght.com (external link)
---------------
Canon EOS R5 | R6 | TTArtisan 11mm Fisheye | Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 | RF 24-105mm f/4L IS | Tamron 35mm f/1.4 | RF 35mm f/1.8 | RF 50mm f/1.8 | RF 85mm f/2 | RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS | Sigma 135mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cookie99
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
     
Dec 10, 2007 06:13 as a reply to  @ Jman13's post |  #3

I have the lens set right on the start of the infinity "L" not past it but even so does not the DOF of F8 compensate.


Chris Cooke "Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni"
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MDJAK
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
24,745 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 204
Joined Nov 2004
Location: New York
     
Dec 10, 2007 07:00 |  #4

Here's your answer, Chris: The birds you are shooting are just too far away. I shot Bald Eagles last winter with my 300 f2.8 +1.4 combo. In this case the birds were approx 100 yards away and sometimes more. While it may have focused, the resulting pictures were basically useless. Even though I was shooting with the 1DsMKII, a 16 mp camera, the Eagle occupied maybe 1/20th of the frame, if that, so less than 1mp of the frame was the bird. Once viewed at 100 percent, the pics just sucked. I learned here that some things are just too far away for the lens to work well. It did come as a surprise.
Here is an example. And this is 100 percent the resulting size:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'

mark



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Dec 10, 2007 07:54 |  #5

I don't understand , why are you focusing on infinity? 200-500 yards is not infinity on a long lens. Like Mark just mentioned, if they are but a dot in the viewfinder = so small you cannot focus on them, you need to get closer or use a longer lens.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike55
Goldmember
Avatar
4,206 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Dec 10, 2007 10:23 |  #6

Mdjak nailed it.


6D | 70D | 24-105 L IS | 17-40 L | 300 F4 L IS | 50 1.8 II | 1.4x II | LR5 | HV30 | bug spray | wilderness
Gallatin National Forest, Montana (external link)/Lassen Volcanic NP Campgrounds (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cookie99
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
     
Dec 10, 2007 11:42 as a reply to  @ Mike55's post |  #7

Mdjak nailed it.

Thanks folks I suspect that you are right.

Thanks for your help, it would appear that patience is the answer.

This is the best I got at about 250 yards.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

Chris Cooke "Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni"
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Dec 10, 2007 11:55 |  #8

If it makes you feel any better, manual focusing on bird's eyes does take a lot of pratice. Even with the best equipment.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 10, 2007 12:00 |  #9

I think that this is a fact of life with wildlife shooting! There is always something that is just farther away than we'd like! I still like to take the shot, though!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cookie99
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
     
Dec 10, 2007 12:16 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #10

Thanks, I see a 500mm Sigma 4.5 in the equation as soon as my wife leaves her credit card lying around.:)


Chris Cooke "Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni"
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Dec 10, 2007 12:49 |  #11

Learn how to get closer. Always a good solution.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Dec 10, 2007 13:23 |  #12

Manually focusing based on the distance scale is a bit imprecise, especially with today's autofocus lenses with relatively short scales (except the 85/1.2 which has a very long vernier focus scale). It's better to do so with the eye through the viewfinder, but that is also difficult when trying to track a moving object.

I find autofocus superior for anything that is moving or is small in relation to the overall size of the viewfinder.


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cookie99
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
     
Dec 10, 2007 13:32 as a reply to  @ Tom W's post |  #13

This is about the best I got at about 400 yards with a 2X Kenko converter 600mm hand held manual focus but I deleted a lot of fuzzy ones (and I clipped his bloody wing on this one)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

Chris Cooke "Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni"
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,627 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Trouble with manual focus 300mm F4L IS at long distance.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1067 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.