Usually on a Crop camera 35 or 50mm is the standard, you already have one of the best portrait lenses though. (50mm 1.4)
That's what I thought. A lot of posts say 50 or the 85L on a crop and between 85 and 135 on FF bodies. Thanks 

ssidiv3r Luck never made a man wise 5,495 posts Likes: 20 Joined Oct 2007 More info | Feb 05, 2008 11:47 | #6736 Bootsie wrote in post #4856462 Usually on a Crop camera 35 or 50mm is the standard, you already have one of the best portrait lenses though. (50mm 1.4) That's what I thought. A lot of posts say 50 or the 85L on a crop and between 85 and 135 on FF bodies. Thanks Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Chet showed up to keep the place interesting More info | Feb 05, 2008 12:00 | #6737 Bootsie wrote in post #4856462 Usually on a Crop camera 35 or 50mm is the standard, you already have one of the best portrait lenses though. (50mm 1.4) So your saying the 50mm 1.4 rivals the L glass for portraits? I always thought I would need to step up to get good glass for portraits.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ssidiv3r Luck never made a man wise 5,495 posts Likes: 20 Joined Oct 2007 More info | Feb 05, 2008 12:07 | #6738 FuryMe wrote in post #4856605 So your saying the 50mm 1.4 rivals the L glass for portraits? I always thought I would need to step up to get good glass for portraits. I think what Brooke meant was the 50/1.4 is good enough for it's price if you already have one. If I didn't have the 50 but had a big budget I think I would go for the L but that's not the case. Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2008 12:11 | #6739 FuryMe wrote in post #4856605 So your saying the 50mm 1.4 rivals the L glass for portraits? I always thought I would need to step up to get good glass for portraits. Many on these forums says that stopped down the 50 1.4 would rival L glass. I have a 50 1.8 and stopped down a little, that thing is razor sharp, I can only imagine how much better the 50 1.4 is. (btw I LOVE my 50 1.8 for portraits, it is just a little long if you are short on space, that is why I also recommended the 35mm.) {Brooke}
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ssidiv3r Luck never made a man wise 5,495 posts Likes: 20 Joined Oct 2007 More info | Feb 05, 2008 12:13 | #6740 Bootsie wrote in post #4856670 Many on these forums says that stopped down the 50 1.4 would rival L glass. I have a 50 1.8 and stopped down a little, that thing is razor sharp, I can only imagine how much better the 50 1.4 is. I don't have to imagine Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2008 12:14 | #6741 ssidiv3r wrote in post #4856688 I don't have to imagine All I need to do is get out and take more shots with it and find somebody I can practice portraits withQuit bragging! {Brooke}
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Chet showed up to keep the place interesting More info | Feb 05, 2008 12:17 | #6742 I do love my 1.4, I hardly take if off my camera. It is long on a crop body though, especially in a little house like I have. I guess I'll work on getting the 10-22 instead of "L" glass.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ssidiv3r Luck never made a man wise 5,495 posts Likes: 20 Joined Oct 2007 More info | Feb 05, 2008 12:17 | #6743 Why? It's about the ONLY thing I can brag about Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2008 12:18 | #6744 But I want one! {Brooke}
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ssidiv3r Luck never made a man wise 5,495 posts Likes: 20 Joined Oct 2007 More info | Feb 05, 2008 12:20 | #6745 FuryMe wrote in post #4856717 I do love my 1.4, I hardly take if off my camera. It is long on a crop body though, especially in a little house like I have. I guess I'll work on getting the 10-22 instead of "L" glass. Might also want to consider the 16-35 L if you want a little more length. The only reason I ever considered the 10-22 is for underwater shooting (which isn't going to happen in the near future). Other than that I always thought it was too wide to get much normal use Bootsie wrote in post #4856727 But I want one! (and you can brag about your Macbook Pro, I want one of those too.)Then go buy one. Hey, you're right....I love my 17 inch, silver MacBook Pro[SIZE=2]. Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Chet showed up to keep the place interesting More info | Feb 05, 2008 12:27 | #6746 ssidiv3r wrote in post #4856737 Might also want to consider the 16-35 L if you want a little more length. The only reason I ever considered the 10-22 is for underwater shooting (which isn't going to happen in the near future). Other than that I always thought it was too wide to get much normal use My dad is a commercial photog, so I have access to his 16-35L, but he is also FF it's crazy looking into his view finder with the 16 mounted.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SoaringUSAEagle Daddy Of The Crop 10,814 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Cheyenne, WY More info | Feb 05, 2008 12:29 | #6747 FuryMe wrote in post #4856788 My dad is a commercial photog, so I have access to his 16-35L, but he is also FF it's crazy looking into his view finder with the 16 mounted. On a 5D you can see around corners just by panning... pretty amazing 5D4 | 50 1.4 | 85L II | 24-70L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SoaringUSAEagle Daddy Of The Crop 10,814 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Cheyenne, WY More info | Feb 05, 2008 12:30 | #6748 Oh, and guys..... I am ready to hit 5k today, so let's get going LOL. I am home from class now. Didnt take nearly as long to get home. The roads are melting nicely now that the sun is out. But this morning really sucked. 5D4 | 50 1.4 | 85L II | 24-70L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ssidiv3r Luck never made a man wise 5,495 posts Likes: 20 Joined Oct 2007 More info | Feb 05, 2008 12:33 | #6749 FuryMe wrote in post #4856788 My dad is a commercial photog, so I have access to his 16-35L, but he is also FF it's crazy looking into his view finder with the 16 mounted. Cool, must be VERY different than when using a crop body Jeff Allred wrote in post #4856799 On a 5D you can see around corners just by panning... pretty amazing ![]() I've though about getting a 5D but that's still WAY in the future. Too bad the 10-22 is an EF-S otherwise putting that on a 5D would look wild Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Adamora Who said i want a title? :( More info | Feb 05, 2008 12:33 | #6750 If any of you guys have time to check this site out http://www.exitmundi.nl/exitmundi.htm [Adam]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1826 guests, 104 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||