Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 10 Dec 2007 (Monday) 21:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Small canon white lens???

 
Baddrummerboyy
Senior Member
501 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Dec 11, 2007 12:14 as a reply to  @ post 4483299 |  #16

I think you saw the 70-200mm 4.0 or 4.0 IS. My friend has the 70-200mm 2.8 IS and I used it a couple of times. When I got my 70-200mm 4.0 IS, it looked a lot smaller then I expected. I was expecting something bigger, because I saw the picture comparison on the-digital-picture. I had a sigma 70-200mm 2.8 and when my sister saw my Canon 70-200mm 4.0 IS, they were like man that is a lot smaller then your old lens.


Current: Canon 40D w/BG-E2N, Canon 30D, Canon 10-22mm, Canon 17-55mm 2.8 IS w/EW-83J, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS, Canon 580EX II, Crumpler 6 Million Bag, and B+W MRC on all my glass.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hoogerhs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
14 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Dec 11, 2007 18:27 |  #17

ed rader wrote in post #4480408 (external link)
are you sure it was a canon camera? one of the pretenders has smaller white lenses.

ed rader

I'm certain. It was attached to a 1D Mark II or Mark IIn based on sound of it firing off.

Baddrummerboyy wrote in post #4483345 (external link)
I think you saw the 70-200mm 4.0 or 4.0 IS. My friend has the 70-200mm 2.8 IS and I used it a couple of times. When I got my 70-200mm 4.0 IS, it looked a lot smaller then I expected. I was expecting something bigger, because I saw the picture comparison on the-digital-picture. I had a sigma 70-200mm 2.8 and when my sister saw my Canon 70-200mm 4.0 IS, they were like man that is a lot smaller then your old lens.

At this point I'm fairly convinced it must have been a 70-200 f/4 IS. At least that is what it looked like. Perhaps on the 1D body it ... just looks smaller than it actually is??


BTW that silver/champagne lens is ugly...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cybnew
Goldmember
Avatar
2,010 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Cayucos California, Seattle, The Arctic Circle
     
Dec 11, 2007 19:10 |  #18

cdifoto wrote in post #4480849 (external link)
FWIW, in person the 70-200 f/4 looks like something you'd find in a sex shop.

There goes a low blow to my ego :)


Gear List
Well, my name is Mat, but most people call me... Mat.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timmytimmytimmy
Member
69 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Dec 11, 2007 20:32 |  #19

THe 70-200 F4 looks very small, because it is not very wide, although height wise it is similar to the f2.8.


timmyli photography (external link) | My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
macroimage
Goldmember
2,169 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2007
     
Dec 15, 2007 23:05 |  #20

Radek wrote in post #4483299 (external link)
http://g-ec2.images-amazon.com/images/I/51​8NAK4PRQL.jpg (external link) - this one is not white but silver. It's old ef 28-90 sold as a kit lens with the EOS 300 (film camera). The smalles white lens in Canon line-up is the 70-200 4.0. Minolta made some white lenses in the past too.

The EF 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6L USM is white and is quite a bit smaller smaller than the 70-200 f/4. The EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM is also shorter than the 70-200 when at the 28mm position. He might have seen someone with one of those. The 35-350 is remarkably compact really when at 35mm.


Photo Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,934 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Small canon white lens???
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1843 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.