Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 13 Dec 2007 (Thursday) 11:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Low light photography and the 70-200 2.8 IS

 
irish1
Senior Member
277 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Arizona
     
Dec 13, 2007 11:46 |  #1

My new 2.8 IS gets here tomorrow, just in time for my daughters dance performance. I've never used an IS lens before, how does it work best in a low light situation? I can use a monopod if I choose. My plan is to use ISO1600, cable release. Any suggestions?


Canon 40D, Sigma 17-70, Sigma 10-20, nifty 50, 50 1.4, 85 1.8, 70-200 4L, 70-200 f/2.8 IS, 430 EX, Manfrotto monopod, tripod and ball head, Tamrac MAS system

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Dec 13, 2007 11:54 |  #2

For a dance recital where your subjects are usually always in motion, I doubt that you'll be using a shutter speed that's going to be slow enough to warrant using a cable release. However, turning on IS, to reduce camera shakes, and a monopod wouldn't be a bad idea.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2384
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Dec 13, 2007 12:06 |  #3

IS doesn't freeze subject motion, it only helps with lens/camera shake, so as PacAce said, you're going to need a reasonable shutter speed to prevent subject blur due to their movement. The monopod would be a good idea.

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

974 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Low light photography and the 70-200 2.8 IS
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
3419 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.