Just a few shots taken quickly on a little tour round the peninsula we now live on in Wellington. Yes, I do feel a bit smug about where we now live.
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Enjoy, comments as always, are welcome.
manipula Cream of the Crop  5,290 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: English Wookie in Wellington, NZ. More info | Dec 16, 2007 19:35 | #1 Just a few shots taken quickly on a little tour round the peninsula we now live on in Wellington. Yes, I do feel a bit smug about where we now live. 2) 3) 4) 5) Enjoy, comments as always, are welcome. Cheers, Dave.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shakyhands Senior Member  408 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Holland Landing, Ontario More info | Dec 16, 2007 20:27 | #2 You have every right to feel a little smug! Is it possible to take a bad picture in NZ? Every picture or documentary I've seen makes me very envious. Yours are no exception. I like the boat in #1 but I love #3 the most. 5D MkII, 7D, 24-70L, 17-40L, 100-400L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
weegee Senior Member  486 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2007 More info | Dec 17, 2007 02:24 | #3 yep, #3. Great colors. Mother nature sure can help sometimes. Great location. My Online Gallery: http://fotoluigi.zenfolio.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer  51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Jan 11, 2008 19:30 | #4 3 & 4 are awesome, the rest are good too Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
H.B. Goldmember  1,207 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Adelaide Hills Oz' stralia More info | Jan 12, 2008 03:41 | #5 Great photo's Dave. I'd be quite happy to be there too. Catch me on FLICKR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Jan 12, 2008 03:58 | #6 H.B. wrote in post #4686494  Great photo's Dave. I'd be quite happy to be there too. Tim mentioned getting a big print size. I just wanted to ask about that (sorry, didnt mean to hijack the thread). I looked on a printing site today and they say that "Recommended min pixels" of 2398 x 3602 is required for printing a pic of 8 x 12". All of my shots are 3888 x 2500 (400D at max size). Would I still be able to print big at that amount of pixels? Cheers..........Mick. Have a read of my printing and enlargement FAQ, link in my sig Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
H.B. Goldmember 1,207 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Adelaide Hills Oz' stralia More info | Jan 12, 2008 04:01 | #7 |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Jan 12, 2008 04:36 | #8 I think that just means i'm the one that carries the flash eh? Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 12, 2008 05:49 | #9 dave you miss us all back n the uk really photos like this are just you trying to kid us you dont, ok just trying to hide my envy its a lovely place to live and certainly better than this overcrowded little island enjoy Canon 5DMK111 and mk 11 - -- EF 70-200 f2.8 L Canon EF 24-105 L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1636 guests, 137 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
.
