Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 10 Sep 2004 (Friday) 09:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Online petition to Canon about pricing

 
aam1234
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Sep 10, 2004 15:47 |  #31

Hi gcogger again. Sorry I didn't see your reply earlier.

If I may comment on your reply, I'd like to say two things.

If £4255 is the price without VAT

The operative word in that quote is "if". Mathematically, you still didn't demonstrate the price before VAT.

"The exchange rate I used was the one the banks use when transferring money between currencies"

Sorry, that's the definition of an exchange rate, not the basis of the rate you used for that calculation.


"Yes, you or I would get a less favourable rate, but it would be either above or below the Interbank rate depending on whether we wanted to convert £££ to $$$ or vice versa"

Sorry again. First, the Interbank rate is the rate for exchanging one million US dollars and above. Don't know about you, but I don't make these transactions very often.

Second, it doesn't matter if you are exchanging US$ for Pounds or vice versa. The market set these rates, not even the all mighty the US Federal Reserve can affect the exchange rate for more than an hour or two. And even that influence is due to the phyicology (spelling) of the market, not supply and demand of a certain currency.

I think we went too far with this subject.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
atleypnorth
Member
128 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: London
     
Sep 10, 2004 16:35 |  #32

To calculate price ex vat (with VAT at 17.5%) ....

5000 / 1.175 = 4255




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MarkH
Senior Member
Avatar
431 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: New Zealand
     
Sep 10, 2004 16:37 |  #33

aam1234 wrote:
Hi gcogger again. Sorry I didn't see your reply earlier.

If I may comment on your reply, I'd like to say two things.

If £4255 is the price without VAT

The operative word in that quote is "if". Mathematically, you still didn't demonstrate the price before VAT.

Since I don't live in the UK I am not 100% certain of the VAT rate and can't be arsed looking it up. However gcogger stated that it is 17.5% and no one has challenged that. gcogger mentions that the best price he has seen is around £5000 and has clearly explained that 4255 would be the price without VAT. Why is his explanation not clear?

If a product costs 100 + 17.5% VAT then the total is 117.50 which is most simply calculated by price x 1.175 = price incl VAT. To reverse this calculation simply take the inclusive price and divide by 1.175 like so: 117.50/1.175=100.

Hence:
5000/1.175=4255.32

Simple!


Mark Heyes (New Zealand)
See my pics at www.gigatech.co.nz (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aam1234
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Sep 10, 2004 16:54 |  #34

opps




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
evilenglishman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,184 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2003
     
Sep 10, 2004 17:01 |  #35

MarkH wrote:
If a product costs 100 + 17.5% VAT then the total is 117.50 which is most simply calculated by price x 1.175 = price incl VAT. To reverse this calculation simply take the inclusive price and divide by 1.175 like so: 117.50/1.175=100.

Hence:
5000/1.175=4255.32

Simple!

It's getting late and my brain isn't working.
just playing with a calculator;

100 + 17.5% = 117.50

117.50 - 17.5% = 96.93

huh?

#edit# and where does the 1.175 come from???


Click here to view and/or sign the petition (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aam1234
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Sep 10, 2004 17:07 |  #36

Under construction....need work on my math.

Sorry guys about that, especially to gcogger.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aam1234
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Sep 10, 2004 17:09 |  #37

#edit# and where does the 1.175 come from???

It's 1+ the vat rate.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
evilenglishman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,184 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2003
     
Sep 10, 2004 17:13 |  #38

i've had too much to drink tonight ?!

my sluured brain is telling me that if a camera costs 5999.90 with vat, then I subtract 17.5% from that figure and I get 4949.91 which is the amount minus 17.5%

i need sleep


Click here to view and/or sign the petition (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
evilenglishman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,184 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2003
     
Sep 10, 2004 17:42 |  #39

these were my earlier exchange rate calculations;

EF 50mm f/1.8 II. UK: £79.90 ($142.97) US: $74.95
EF 17-40mm f/4L USM. UK: £579.90 ($1,037.55) US: $689.95
EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS UK: £1449.90 ($2,594.16) US: $1,649.95

now some fun.

uk prices without 17.5% VAT and USA prices unchanged.

EF 50mm f/1.8 II. UK: £68 ($122.27) US: $74.95 (UK $47.32 more)
EF 17-40mm f/4L USM. UK: £493.53 ($887.46) US: $689.95 (UK $197.51 more)
EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS UK: £1233.95 ($2,218.88) US: $1,649.95 (UK $568.93 more)


Click here to view and/or sign the petition (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aam1234
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Sep 10, 2004 17:50 |  #40

If I were you DIJ, I would also show the "%" difference.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
evilenglishman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,184 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2003
     
Sep 10, 2004 17:55 |  #41

hahaha, bugger off! I'm off to bed now with my thick head :D


Click here to view and/or sign the petition (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gcogger
Goldmember
2,554 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK
     
Sep 11, 2004 05:03 |  #42

aam1234 wrote:
If I were you DIJ, I would also show the "%" difference.

Allow me :)

50mm = 63%
17-40 = 29%
70-200 = 34%

I also get 31% for the popular 70-200 f/4 L, and 29% for the 28-135 IS. So it looks like most lenses are around 1/3 more in the UK (the 50mm being an exception).

I thought I'd try some popular Sigma lenses for comparison:
18-125 DC = 19%
15-30 EX = 17%
70-200 f/2.8 EX = 15%
50-500 (Bigma) = 12%

The Sigma prices may be OK - the trading regulations and company taxes are different in the 2 countries. It certainly seems that Canon increase their UK prices more than Sigma, however.


Graeme
My galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blinking8s
Goldmember
Avatar
1,618 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Location: w.kentucky
     
Sep 11, 2004 05:09 |  #43

how many actual units of 10d's and 300d's were sold? Im guessing lots, ive met enough dumbasses with 10d's in school who shoot on automatic mode, i dont even bother thinking of them as people anymore...


blinking8s.com (external link) | pixelpost photoblog application (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
evilenglishman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,184 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2003
     
Sep 11, 2004 07:08 |  #44

blinking8s wrote:
how many actual units of 10d's and 300d's were sold? Im guessing lots, ive met enough dumbasses with 10d's in school who shoot on automatic mode, i dont even bother thinking of them as people anymore...

what has that got to do with anything? ?!


Click here to view and/or sign the petition (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pekka
El General Moderator
Avatar
18,386 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 2470
Joined Mar 2001
Location: Hellsinki, Finland
     
Sep 11, 2004 07:14 |  #45

blinking8s wrote:
how many actual units of 10d's and 300d's were sold? Im guessing lots, ive met enough dumbasses with 10d's in school who shoot on automatic mode, i dont even bother thinking of them as people anymore...

If there is auto or P mode on a camera there is no reason why one should not be able to use it. 1D has P mode, too. Am I a dumbass if I tell you I have used P mode now and then?


The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
AMASS 2.5 Changelog (installed here now)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,719 views & 0 likes for this thread, 26 members have posted to it.
Online petition to Canon about pricing
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1731 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.