Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 18 Dec 2007 (Tuesday) 10:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon VS Kenko Extension Tubes

 
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Dec 18, 2007 10:12 |  #1

I already have the Kenko Extension Tube DG Set (12mm, 20mm, 36mm) but am a little unhappy with how they feel when they go on a lens. They seem to grab a lot more and almost grind against the lens and against the body when they are being put on. So I am thinking of selling these and getting 2 Canon EF25 and one EF12 instead but I have two questions first:


  1. Does anyone else who has the Kenko set experience the same thing with the "grippyness"?
  2. Can anyone with the Canon EF12 or EF25 Mark I or II verify that the Canons go on as smoothly as any other Canon lens?
Thanks for your help everyone!

[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Dec 18, 2007 10:19 |  #2

I thought the main complaint would be that they go on loose. Are you hurting the lenses or camera with your Kenkos? I doubt it. Why change? Yes, Canon are built better and work well, go on smoothly, etc.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
THREAD ­ STARTER
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Dec 18, 2007 10:23 |  #3

gasrocks wrote in post #4527476 (external link)
I thought the main complaint would be that they go on loose. Are you hurting the lenses or camera with your Kenkos? I doubt it. Why change? Yes, Canon are built better and work well, go on smoothly, etc.

I dont know, I guess Im just anal with my camera equipment and its bugging me every time I put those tubes on one of my lenses. I dont understand it. The surface is is brand new and PERFECTLY clean and clear but they still grab and grind. It must be just due to cheap materials or something.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
runninmann
what the heck do I know?
Avatar
8,156 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Likes: 154
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Michigan-U.S.A.
     
Dec 18, 2007 10:37 |  #4

Can you discern any wear/scrapes/scratches on your camera or lens mounting surfaces as a result?


My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,717 posts
Likes: 4036
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 18, 2007 10:55 |  #5

Hmm.. I've been deciding on the two as well and understood that the Kenkos were looser. Grippy is good. Keeps the lens from falling off.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Bob
Goldmember
2,063 posts
Likes: 52
Joined May 2007
Location: Poitou-Charentes, France
     
Dec 18, 2007 11:26 as a reply to  @ gjl711's post |  #6

I've had two sets of Kenko's, one a little loose and one a little tight. They've both been replaced by EF12's and EF25's. The Canon ones feel good...just like the lens to camera connection.
I'm sure others will disagree but I'm much more confident in the Canon ones.

I'm not the only person to have concerns https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=186161

Bob


1Dx2 (2), 5DSR, 1Ds3, 1D4, 5D2(590nm), 5D2(720nm) EF600 EF400 EF300-II EF300 EF200 EF200-II EF180L EF135L EF100 EF85-II EF50L TS-E17/4 TS-E24L-II TS-E45 TS-E90 MP-E65 EF70-200-II EF24-70/2.8-II EF16-35/4 EF8-15/4 EF11-24/4 Zeiss 15/2.8 21/2.8 25/2 28/2 35/1.4 35/2 50/2 85/1.4 100/2 135/2 T/C's L-SC & a WIFE!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asylumxl
Goldmember
2,306 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Stuck in an invisible box
     
Dec 18, 2007 11:40 |  #7

In the end, they are just tubes with no optics. You aren't going to be panning with extension tubes or anything that would cause the lens to hurtle off. If you feel like being pedantic, spend more of your money on Canon tubes, if not, stick with the Kenkos.


...............
I M A G E I N A T I O N
..........WEBSITE (external link)
...............
Pixel peeping is like count the sides of a circle, pointless.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
THREAD ­ STARTER
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Dec 18, 2007 11:42 |  #8

Not really worried about the lens falling off as these are definitely on there tight and not loose at all, I just dont like how they feel grinding against the lens and body...


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
THREAD ­ STARTER
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Dec 18, 2007 11:42 |  #9

runninmann wrote in post #4527591 (external link)
Can you discern any wear/scrapes/scratches on your camera or lens mounting surfaces as a result?

No, nothing like that. Yet anyway.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asylumxl
Goldmember
2,306 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Stuck in an invisible box
     
Dec 18, 2007 11:49 |  #10

ben_r_ wrote in post #4528040 (external link)
Not really worried about the lens falling off as these are definitely on there tight and not loose at all, I just dont like how they feel grinding against the lens and body...

That's what is called friction :p. Sorry couldn't resist.


...............
I M A G E I N A T I O N
..........WEBSITE (external link)
...............
Pixel peeping is like count the sides of a circle, pointless.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
THREAD ­ STARTER
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Dec 18, 2007 12:05 |  #11

asylumxl wrote in post #4528101 (external link)
That's what is called friction :p. Sorry couldn't resist.

Yea and I probably deserve that for being overly nit picky... I dont know if you own or have ever tried the Kenkos before but they are def WAY different feeling going on than a nice Canon lens is.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asylumxl
Goldmember
2,306 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Stuck in an invisible box
     
Dec 18, 2007 12:18 |  #12

ben_r_ wrote in post #4528217 (external link)
Yea and I probably deserve that for being overly nit picky... I dont know if you own or have ever tried the Kenkos before but they are def WAY different feeling going on than a nice Canon lens is.

I'm a bit of a functionalist, if it does the job I'm happy with it. Probably just the finish of the metal that does it.


...............
I M A G E I N A T I O N
..........WEBSITE (external link)
...............
Pixel peeping is like count the sides of a circle, pointless.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Pham
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,102 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: St. Paul MN
     
Dec 18, 2007 14:51 as a reply to  @ asylumxl's post |  #13

i try both of them and end up with the kenko. just couldn't see spending more money on something that work the same and use the same air :D:D. granted the canon one feel nicer but it's just a spacer to me.

Bill


winning is fun and second is for loser
I got Mitch hook on wide angle :lol::lol:
Gear list
http://billpham.smugmu​g.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SaSi
Senior Member
Avatar
472 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Athens, Greece
     
Dec 18, 2007 17:44 |  #14

I have tried the thin Canon tube (sorry can't recall the size). I also bought the Kenko set. To me, even the Kenko tubes seem too expensive, but looking at them perhaps they are worth their price.

The lens fits perfectly and safely. I can even accept mounting the heavy 500/4 on a tube to reduce MFT.

The Canon tube felt heavier and heftier. It did exactly the same job but cost almost twice or more.

If it fits well and doesn't grind the lens mount or the camera mount, then I would say, they are the perfect fit.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,704 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Canon VS Kenko Extension Tubes
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1174 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.