*cough* "fast, at least f/2" (from the OP's first post)
That kinda rules out any zoom

*cries in a corner*
Adamora Who said i want a title? :( More info | Dec 31, 2007 08:13 | #31 kevin_c wrote in post #4601000 *cough* "fast, at least f/2" (from the OP's first post) That kinda rules out any zoom ![]() *cries in a corner* [Adam]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rattymouse Member 173 posts Joined Mar 2006 More info | Dec 31, 2007 10:29 | #32 kevin_c wrote in post #4596445 Nobody seems to talk about the Canon 20mm f/2.8 USM - Is it a pile of poo? This would give you 32mm fov on a 1.6x crop - I like a 35mm fov on FF/35mm although it is a bit slow for a prime. No, it isnt. Photo from my EF 20mm 2.8 Canon Rebel XT, 20mm 2.8, 35mm 2.0, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.2 L II, 100mm 2.8 Macro, 300mm 4.0 L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kevin_c Cream of the Crop 5,745 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Devon, England More info | Dec 31, 2007 10:40 | #33
-- K e v i n --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rattymouse Member 173 posts Joined Mar 2006 More info | Dec 31, 2007 11:05 | #34 kevin_c wrote in post #4602299 Looks nice! - I'm going to see if I can try one out locally(ish) - problem is not many places seem to actually stock it ![]() I'm sure I'll be happy with it, and its loads cheaper than the 24L! Is your USM 'noisy'? that seems to be a complaint I keep on coming across. Nope. USM seems normal to me. I use my 20mm all the time on my 1.6 crop camera. Canon Rebel XT, 20mm 2.8, 35mm 2.0, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.2 L II, 100mm 2.8 Macro, 300mm 4.0 L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kevin_c Cream of the Crop 5,745 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Devon, England More info | Dec 31, 2007 11:51 | #35 rattymouse wrote in post #4602458 Nope. USM seems normal to me. I use my 20mm all the time on my 1.6 crop camera. Thanks. -- K e v i n --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Madweasel Cream of the Crop 6,224 posts Likes: 61 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Fareham, UK More info | Dec 31, 2007 15:42 | #36 cdifoto wrote in post #4600965 You've obviously never been in my house, my grandmother's house, or my sister's house. Or probably any other average home or church for that matter. And no, I don't want to and/or can't always take the easy way out with the use of flash. What I'm saying is just because it doesn't appeal to you, doesn't mean there's no legitimate use for it. OP stated his needs. OP doesn't have to justify his needs to anyone. No, he doesn't have to justify his needs or wants, and my first response to the OP was an attempt to answer the question directly. But if we knew the application, those of us with wider knowledge or longer experience may be able to offer alternatives. The teaching/learning element of this forum is one of its great strengths. Mark.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 559 guests, 153 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||