Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
Thread started 16 Sep 2004 (Thursday) 06:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

420EX and ReChargeble Batteries

 
andrewaaa5
Goldmember
Avatar
1,225 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: scandinavia
     
Sep 16, 2004 06:47 |  #1

Has anyone had any experience with 420EX and ReChargeble Batteries?

I am currently buying my 4 pack of normal non-rechargable AAs from shops but am tempted to try rechargables. I would like to know if anyone else has tried rechargables and if they are worth it.

Andrew


andrew crighton
website -- > www.butterpeanut.com (external link)
flickr -- > flickr/photos/andrewaa​a5 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EZRider
Senior Member
Avatar
831 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Kissimmee, Florida
     
Sep 16, 2004 09:35 |  #2

I have and they work well :) I have a Sunpack rapid charger for NI-MH and NI-CD batteries and i have two set's of batteries. They charge very fast, couple of hours! And last a long time.

I use recharger for all sorts of things around here now, cordless keyboards, mouse, kids toys, you name it! :mrgreen:


http://spaces.msn.com/​patriot1964/ (external link)
G2 / 300D / 24-105L IS / 100-400L IS / Nifty Fifty / 420EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
darrylr
Member
135 posts
Joined Aug 2003
     
Sep 16, 2004 12:06 |  #3

I have a 2 sets of Maha Powerex 2200 mAh batteries that I use in my 420ex. I also have a Maha charger. They work great and seem to last forever. They seem to keep their charge pretty well evening when sitting unused for a few weeks at a time.

http://www.mahaenergy.​com/store/Index.asp (external link)

-Darryl




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andrewaaa5
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,225 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: scandinavia
     
Sep 17, 2004 01:48 |  #4

thanks a lot, i'll be going shopping this saturday it seems.
andrew


andrew crighton
website -- > www.butterpeanut.com (external link)
flickr -- > flickr/photos/andrewaa​a5 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JOKI
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Sep 2004
     
Sep 19, 2004 22:53 |  #5

Sure!,I've de 420x and SANYO 2200mH + ANSMANN charger.
I think THE best combination on town.
Good Luck!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
uberG
Member
61 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: New England
     
Sep 21, 2004 17:26 |  #6

I use RayOVac rechargeable batteries (NiMH) in my 420EX...works better than I would have guessed.


Nikon L22
Canon A1100IS
Canon SX120IS
Nikon D40
Nikon D300s

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aericj
Goldmember
Avatar
1,240 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Louisville, K USA
     
Sep 21, 2004 18:14 |  #7

I use RayOVac rechargeable batteries (NiMH) in my 420EX...works better than I would have guessed.

Same here. Last quite a while, even sitting unused, recycle the flash fast and charge in about an hour.


Canon Ti5 w/ 18-135 IS STM, 70-300 IS, 85 1.8
Canon 20D w/ Tamron 17-50
Olympus PEN E-PL2 w/ VF-2, Panny 20, 14-42 II
Flash - 550EX, 430EX II, Vivitar 283's
Other - Bogen tripod w/ ballhead, Vivitar monopod, Kenko tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aericj
Goldmember
Avatar
1,240 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Louisville, K USA
     
Sep 21, 2004 18:14 |  #8

I use RayOVac rechargeable batteries (NiMH) in my 420EX...works better than I would have guessed.

Same here. Last quite a while, even sitting unused, recycle the flash fast and charge in about an hour.


Canon Ti5 w/ 18-135 IS STM, 70-300 IS, 85 1.8
Canon 20D w/ Tamron 17-50
Olympus PEN E-PL2 w/ VF-2, Panny 20, 14-42 II
Flash - 550EX, 430EX II, Vivitar 283's
Other - Bogen tripod w/ ballhead, Vivitar monopod, Kenko tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crowne
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Sep 2004
     
Sep 24, 2004 23:20 |  #9

darrylr wrote:
I have a 2 sets of Maha Powerex 2200 mAh batteries that I use in my 420ex. I also have a Maha charger. They work great and seem to last forever. They seem to keep their charge pretty well evening when sitting unused for a few weeks at a time.

http://www.mahaenergy.​com/store/Index.asp (external link)

-Darryl

I"ll second that. :) HIGHLY RECOMMEND.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
s00pcan
Senior Member
261 posts
Joined Dec 2003
     
Sep 25, 2004 06:04 |  #10

I have powerex batteries and they work great. It does make the flash noiser when you start it up though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flowe
Member
116 posts
Joined Mar 2003
     
Sep 26, 2004 12:52 |  #11

Batteries for 420EX

In Dec 03, I wrote in https://photography-on-the.net …ad.php?t=21552&​highlight=
the following, and I think it wortwhile to repeat it here:

A very viable alternative are the *non-rechargeable* Energizer Lithium L91 batteries:
- multiple power content as alkaline
- high current capability
- maintaining voltage
- shelf life 10 years
- performing -40...+60°C (-40...+140°F)
- weight 14g each (.5oz) as compared to alkaline 23g
- non leakable
- price about 4 times as alkaline
- available in AA size only

For more details go to
http://www.cliffshade.​com/dpfwiw/batteries.h​tm (external link)
and there search for "Still Need Convincing?"

Rechargeable batteries make sense only if the charge is consumed within weeks, because of self discharge.

In the 420EX, alcalines should produce about 800 shots, while with the L91 2000 can be expected - take any time, years if you like. With the L91 and as an amateur, you can for a very long time just forget that the unit contains batteries. And if ever spares seem advisable, they weigh only 56g/2oz.

In the meantime, I use the 420EX not often, but regularily - with still the same set of Energizer Lithium L91 batteries - I never ever think that there are batteries inside! After 10 months I can say: a *very* viable alternative!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Claytonian
Member
192 posts
Joined May 2002
Location: Wisconsin
     
Sep 27, 2004 07:59 |  #12

flowe makes a very good point and I totally agree. My previous post in this particular thread was applauding the rechargeable Rayovacs, which I still stand by, but I also have to agree that the Energizer Lithiums that flowe mentions are just awesome in the 420EX.

I have them in the 420EX right now and they have been in there for quite a while. I'm not sure how many flashes have been fired with them, but it has to be over 300 by now. The flash is ready to go almost instantly and it recharges *very* quickly (a little slower when fired at full strength). Just this weekend I took some continuous shots with the 10D (which is no slouch for multiple shots!) and the flash fired for four of the shots in a row before it had to take a second to catch up.

So this little thread has made me think about it and instead of only using my rechargeables in the flash when the Energizers die, I think I will keep a set of new Energizers handy to keep in the flash (since they do not discharge) and use the rechargeables if I know I will be using the flash a lot (since they do discharge when sitting idle).

So all that text up there I wrote simply to applaud the Energizer Lithiums (but I still stick by the Rayovacs as well!). Forgive all the hot air! :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thefly
Member
Avatar
57 posts
Joined Feb 2002
     
Oct 07, 2004 05:53 |  #13

Yes. Works great for me.

Lee

http://www.flyfamily.o​rg (external link)


Lee
~ Be the person your dog thinks you are. ~
http://www.flyfamily.o​rg (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,975 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
420EX and ReChargeble Batteries
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2267 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.