Ok, maybe it's because I am a blonde. Maybe I am just dense...
But why the focus limiting switch on the 100mm f2.8 Macro? What's the best practice use of this switch? One is best for macro, the other for portraits?
Thanks!
Aldwyn
Aldwyn Senior Member 317 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Columbia, Maryland More info | Dec 30, 2007 11:25 | #1 Ok, maybe it's because I am a blonde. Maybe I am just dense... Canon 5DMk2 * 24 - 105mm F4 L * 70-200 f/4 L IS * 100mm f/2.8 Macro * 50mm f/1.8 II * 70 - 300mm f/4 - 5.6 * 580EX II * 430EX * Some Bees * Some Pocket Lint * Camera Debt *
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wimg Cream of the Crop 6,982 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Netherlands, EU More info | Dec 30, 2007 11:27 | #2 One is for macro, the other for normal photography. EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters, and an accessory plague
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CrazyManBehindYou Junior Member 25 posts Joined May 2007 More info | Dec 30, 2007 11:27 | #3 It's so that if you are not focusing up close, the lens will not go through the whole range to focus on something so it should theoretically make it focus faster. I'm new, what do I know?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GlennNK Goldmember 4,630 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Victoria, BC More info | Dec 30, 2007 11:30 | #4 This lens is definitely NOT the quickest, smoothest, most accurately focusing lens in my bag - no matter the setting. Fortunately it's mostly used in manual for closeups and macro, or I would have ditched it by now. When did voluptuous become voluminous?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 30, 2007 11:37 | #5 Ok, so .31 is for macro shooting. The other for non-macro. Makes sense... Thanks! Canon 5DMk2 * 24 - 105mm F4 L * 70-200 f/4 L IS * 100mm f/2.8 Macro * 50mm f/1.8 II * 70 - 300mm f/4 - 5.6 * 580EX II * 430EX * Some Bees * Some Pocket Lint * Camera Debt *
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rattymouse Member 173 posts Joined Mar 2006 More info | Dec 30, 2007 12:01 | #6 Glenn NK wrote in post #4595358 This lens is definitely NOT the quickest, smoothest, most accurately focusing lens in my bag - no matter the setting. Fortunately it's mostly used in manual for closeups and macro, or I would have ditched it by now. I would say it's just plain "clumsy". I'd say that there is something wrong with your lens. I use the 100mm 2.8 macro for sports photography all the time. It keeps up with fast moving people quite easily. Canon Rebel XT, 20mm 2.8, 35mm 2.0, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.2 L II, 100mm 2.8 Macro, 300mm 4.0 L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GlennNK Goldmember 4,630 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Victoria, BC More info | Dec 30, 2007 12:16 | #7 rattymouse wrote in post #4595520 I'd say that there is something wrong with your lens. I use the 100mm 2.8 macro for sports photography all the time. It keeps up with fast moving people quite easily. Very interesting - mine seems to be just plain "jumpy". The other three lenses are quick, smooth, and positive. When did voluptuous become voluminous?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
silvex Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 30, 2007 13:15 | #8 rattymouse wrote in post #4595520 I'd say that there is something wrong with your lens. I use the 100mm 2.8 macro for sports photography all the time. It keeps up with fast moving people quite easily. ![]()
.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Marsellus_Wallace Senior Member 342 posts Joined Apr 2007 More info | Dec 30, 2007 17:54 | #9 One position covers the whole range, the other locks out the macro range, giving you slightly faster autofocus if you're not doing macro, since the lens will only 'search' part of the focus range.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rockabilly808 Goldmember 1,700 posts Likes: 8 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Castine, Maine by way of Kanoehe, Hawaii More info | Dec 30, 2007 18:08 | #10 rattymouse wrote in post #4595520 I'd say that there is something wrong with your lens. I use the 100mm 2.8 macro for sports photography all the time. It keeps up with fast moving people quite easily. ![]() maybe it's the teenage male in me but the first thing I noticed was "she's lovely" Nathan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rattymouse Member 173 posts Joined Mar 2006 More info | Dec 30, 2007 19:02 | #11
Canon Rebel XT, 20mm 2.8, 35mm 2.0, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.2 L II, 100mm 2.8 Macro, 300mm 4.0 L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kuanyu Senior Member 575 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Fl. USA More info | Dec 30, 2007 21:14 | #12 Great shoot rattymouse and I agree my 100mm is rather fast and acurate focus also, 50D & XTi w/Grip - Kit 18-55mm,75-300mm,EF 24-85 IS, 50mm 1.8, 100mm 2.8 macro, 100-400L,580ex,RC-1,(2) AB400s, RF602s ,SoftBox/Barndoors/Brolly Box/Sekonic L-308S Lightmeter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1385 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||