Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 02 Jan 2008 (Wednesday) 05:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Isn't the 1DmarkIIN supposed to have SUPERIOR autofocus?????????????

 
Adaptive
don't defend yourself, call modday
Avatar
1,018 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Filth-a-delphia
     
Jan 02, 2008 05:09 |  #1

So I finally got upset with having only 9 focus points and slow autofocus with the 5D so I broke down and picked up a 1d2n.

I must say I am VERY un-impressed thus far with the 1d2n's performance. Maybe I just got a bad copy or I don't know how to use it yet. But overall the image quality is not hardly comparable to the 5D. At ISO800 the grain is clearly visible where the 5D it is not so much. Also I don't know but the 5D images are more crisp and life like.

So doing weddings I thought the 1d2n would be a good tool because of the superior autofocus.

Here is my issue / question:

I select my autofocus point and when the subject comes into play I place the focus point on my subject then click. Elementary photography 101. So then riddle me this. If I'm shooting 1/100 at f/8 why can't I get the subject in focus!! It's not like I'm doing auto racing, it's just wedding pictures, the fastest movement where these settings could be used is walking down the isle in a well lit room. What is the deal? And I know it's not the lenses, I try the lenses on my 5D and everything is fine.

Here are some tack sharp motion shots from the 5D

http://www.adaptiveod.​com/dddance.jpg (external link)
http://www.adaptiveod.​com/ddddance.jpg (external link)

Here is a cropped sample of the 1d2n awesomeness..... :rolleyes:
Notice the subject (moving) is out of focus and the walls and people in bg are in focus..?
At 1/100 second at ISO500 and f/5.0 she should be TAAACK SHARP! I don't care if it's servo or single shot mode!

http://j.b5z.net/i/u/2​116004/f/wtf.jpg (external link)

It's easy to see that there is alot more motion in the reception photos taken with the 5D. Not to mention the lighting in the room is much darker.

Here is the run down:

Reception shots = 5D
Dark room - Lots of motion
shots shown are taken without roomlight
probably at 800ISO - shutter usually around 1/50 - aperture usually around f/5.0

Ceremony shot = 1d2n
Shot taken in a well lit room, subject motion is slow
500ISO - 1/100sec shutter - f/5.0

You would really think that the 1d2n has the advantage and should have the better shot. HAAA

What is going on? Don't tell me the 5D is better than the 1D2N???

Someone please help me I'm going crazy trying to figure out if I should just go back to the 5d or not....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pknight
Goldmember
Avatar
2,693 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 128
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Flyover Country
     
Jan 02, 2008 05:12 |  #2

I can't answer your questions, not having either camera, but the door hinge sure is in sharp focus in the last picture.


Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
I was "Prime Mover" many years back....
Avatar
38,631 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Berkshire, UK
     
Jan 02, 2008 05:16 |  #3

^^ correct, the camera's focusing on the wrong thing there.

The 5D and 1DII are different beasts when it comes to focusing. You just need to practice more with the 1D to get the best out of it.

Also, the image size limits are 1024px on the longest side. Please resize your shots and edit your post accordingly.


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Reservoir_Dog
Member
Avatar
148 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Belgium
     
Jan 02, 2008 05:18 as a reply to  @ Pete's post |  #4

I think that the 5D have a little bit better image quality...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
I was "Prime Mover" many years back....
Avatar
38,631 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Berkshire, UK
     
Jan 02, 2008 05:22 |  #5

Reservoir_Dog wrote in post #4613172 (external link)
I think that the 5D have a little bit better image quality...

The 5D and 1DII are different cameras with different strengths. For me, the 5D gives excellent results, the 1DIIN is there for sports work. I'd much rather use my 5D indoors and for portrait/events work than the 1DIIN.

I do wish it had more AF points though...


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adamora
Who said i want a title? :(
Avatar
4,742 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Dubai
     
Jan 02, 2008 05:30 |  #6

stupid question, What focus point where you using


[Adam]
[100D][Nifty Fifty]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
I was "Prime Mover" many years back....
Avatar
38,631 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Berkshire, UK
     
Jan 02, 2008 05:37 |  #7

The 5D shots, the subjects are further away and are largely static within their movement (not moving toward or away with any degree of speed). Also being further away, the depth of field at f/5 is larger.

The 1D shot, the subject is closer (rendering a narrower depth of field at f/5) and also moving toward you.

If you weren't using AI Servo AF mode, this result would defintely happen.


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adaptive
THREAD ­ STARTER
don't defend yourself, call modday
Avatar
1,018 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Filth-a-delphia
     
Jan 02, 2008 05:39 |  #8

Adamora wrote in post #4613202 (external link)
stupid question, What focus point where you using

Center top circle. I got the confirmation lock light right on her pearly whites when I clicked the shutter. She should be super sharp.

I also tried using the custom function to auto expand max 13 and max 7 af points. I also tried servo tracking sensitivity on standard, slow, and fast.

I was thinking it was a back focusing issue, but there is no way because with all my expensive L glass there is no way ALL of them are messed up...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adaptive
THREAD ­ STARTER
don't defend yourself, call modday
Avatar
1,018 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Filth-a-delphia
     
Jan 02, 2008 05:42 |  #9

Pete wrote in post #4613223 (external link)
The 5D shots, the subjects are further away and are largely static within their movement (not moving toward or away with any degree of speed). Also being further away, the depth of field at f/5 is larger.

The 1D shot, the subject is closer (rendering a narrower depth of field at f/5) and also moving toward you.

If you weren't using AI Servo AF mode, this result would defintely happen.


The 1d image is a crop to demonstrate the out of focus subject and the in focus background. Without being cropped you can't really tell it is out of focus. The distance to the subject in the 1d photo is about the same as the distance to the girl in the black dress on the second 5d photo. And yes the motion in the 5d photos is greater, the motion in the 1d photo is more steady/predictable.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
I was "Prime Mover" many years back....
Avatar
38,631 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Berkshire, UK
     
Jan 02, 2008 05:46 |  #10

Measurebate your camera with it on a tripod. Once you're happy that the camera isn't back-focusing, generally you'll get better results (it's a trust issue).

Also, try using the "ring of fire" AF points when in AI Servo mode.


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 02, 2008 05:48 |  #11

Are you using AI Servo for that specific 1D IIN image? If so, you can't focus-recompose as it looks like you've done.

Having said that, there are times my 1D II does miss focus. It's man-made equipment so it's not going to be 100% spot on 100% of the time.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete ­ W
Goldmember
Avatar
1,328 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 705
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Hilgay, Norfolk. UK
     
Jan 02, 2008 05:51 |  #12

Does look like it has back focussed to me.. maybe as suggested get a tripod and test chart to check it is focusing correctly. May need to be sent in for callibrating


All the best
Pete Woods LRPS QGP ASINWP
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BogongBreeze
Senior Member
353 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Australia
     
Jan 02, 2008 05:53 |  #13

If you focused using the centre top focus point, what AF mode were you in?

It's a bit puzzling, because the centre top focus point in this shot would be roughly on the partition in the middle of the photo (which looks quite sharp), unless you cropped the photo rather heavily. If you focused and recomposed, by the time you did that she could certainly have moved position. This looks more out of focus than any motion blur, even though it was a fairly slow shutter speed for someone moving towards the camera.

Adaptive wrote in post #4613232 (external link)
Center top circle. I got the confirmation lock light right on her pearly whites when I clicked the shutter. She should be super sharp.

I also tried using the custom function to auto expand max 13 and max 7 af points. I also tried servo tracking sensitivity on standard, slow, and fast.

I was thinking it was a back focusing issue, but there is no way because with all my expensive L glass there is no way ALL of them are messed up...


Miriam
---------------
Canon 90D and various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jan 02, 2008 07:27 |  #14

Adaptive wrote in post #4613232 (external link)
I was thinking it was a back focusing issue, but there is no way because with all my expensive L glass there is no way ALL of them are messed up...

No, but it might be the camera that needs adjusting...


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mitchella68
Member
Avatar
125 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: VA
     
Jan 02, 2008 08:04 |  #15

Took awhile for me to get used to the IIn. And for what its worth I still think my IIn is faster than my 1Ds mkII.( both low light and outside bright ) I found my IIn had a hard time focusing on sand colored things like our pets in lower light were the 1Ds will focus. It might be worth checking your settings. Its a great body and can focus.


http://flickr.com/phot​os/30531800@N08/ (external link)
Mark II, 1Ds mkII
300 2.8 500 f4
70-200 2.8
24-70 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,515 views & 0 likes for this thread, 27 members have posted to it.
Isn't the 1DmarkIIN supposed to have SUPERIOR autofocus?????????????
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1061 guests, 115 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.