Those focal lengths will certainly give you good range coverage. Btu to be comepletely honest with you, I don't know anything about the quality or performance of both of those.
I don't know if you've been to Fred Miranda's site, but there's a lot of very good and useful information there. Heres' a link to info about the 17-70:
http://www.fredmiranda.com …=321&sort=7&cat=37&page=1
[godfather wrote:
='[godfather];5402380']Thankyou Sir.
Also, I am planning to buy two lenses. I have also made a query thread here in this regard. But need yours opinion on the first step. I have decided to buy sigma 17-70 and Canon 55-250 IS. To get a range from 17-250mm. I need 17-70 because of its WA and 2.8 aperture and 55-250 for Telephoto range. Should I go for it?
Or is there any lens which completes the purpose of these two?
='[godfather];5402380']Thankyou Sir.
Also, I am planning to buy two lenses. I have also made a query thread here in this regard. But need yours opinion on the first step. I have decided to buy sigma 17-70 and Canon 55-250 IS. To get a range from 17-250mm. I need 17-70 because of its WA and 2.8 aperture and 55-250 for Telephoto range. Should I go for it?
Or is there any lens which completes the purpose of these two?
