Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 02 Jan 2008 (Wednesday) 14:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Spyder 2 Pro

 
Tapeman
Sliced Bread
Avatar
3,723 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 124
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Twin Cities
     
Jan 02, 2008 14:32 |  #1

My first attempt at calibrating my monitor did not work out so well.

I now have a pink cursor.:oops:

I'll keep trying.


Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
Gitzo 1228, 1275, 1558, Lensbaby 3G. Epson 3880, Bags that match my shoes.:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cuervo79
Member
Avatar
231 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Guatemala
     
Jan 02, 2008 15:38 |  #2

Tip: don't always go for the suggested settings that the wizard gives you when you start create a new profile with the gamma and color temp you want (I go 2.2 and 6500) also if you have a monitor that has RGB controls make sure you're adjusting the Gain controls and not the B (can't remember what B stands for) ones. Also remember if the place you calibrate to has a window light coming in the calibration will be different at different times of day, it is recommended in the manual that you have a working environment with no changing light.


Web page (external link)
Flickr (external link)
Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kuanyu
Senior Member
575 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Fl. USA
     
Jan 02, 2008 16:42 |  #3

Try setting the monitor back to it's default state, then recalibrat with out useing the monitor controls at all.


50D & XTi w/Grip - Kit 18-55mm,75-300mm,EF 24-85 IS, 50mm 1.8, 100mm 2.8 macro, 100-400L,580ex,RC-1,(2) AB400s, RF602s ,SoftBox/Barndoors/Brol​ly Box/Sekonic L-308S Lightmeter
empty wallet:(
Kuanyu.zenfolio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Preben ­ S
Member
Avatar
52 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Bangkok
     
Jan 02, 2008 22:43 |  #4

What color did your cursor have before calibrating?

If it had some out of gamut color, the color after profiling is undefined/unpredictabl​e!
With a simple calibration or profiling with shaper curves, this is not a problem, but with a large LUT profile, out of gamut colors can end anywhere.

If your monitor is an LCD, leave contrast and RGB settings at their default. The brightness setting can be set where you feel comfortable for viewing.
For LCD it is normally best to calibrate for the LCD's native color temperature. If your cursor was white before, it is likely this, that is the problem.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tapeman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Sliced Bread
Avatar
3,723 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 124
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Twin Cities
     
Jan 04, 2008 19:56 as a reply to  @ Preben S's post |  #5

I am trying again, this time with 2 new 22" Samsung LCD monitors. I also got a new desktop PC.

2nd & 3rd attempts are better, but this is going to take time to get right. At least I'll get to know the program.


Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
Gitzo 1228, 1275, 1558, Lensbaby 3G. Epson 3880, Bags that match my shoes.:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jan 04, 2008 20:22 |  #6

Tapeman wrote in post #4633024 (external link)
I am trying again, this time with 2 new 22" Samsung LCD monitors.

I also had major problems calibrating my new 22" Samsung LCD with the Spyder 2 Pro. I got a brownish-yellowish color cast when I calibrated. I finally gave up, uninstalled the software and adjusted it manually. The model I have is the 2220WM. Right out of the box it was extremely bright and had a bluish cast. I have it adjusted manually now so that it feels like my old 19" Dell Ultrasharp.

I've learned through the photo forums that the 22" LCDs are inferior to the 20" and 24". I'm not going to waste money on new calibrating hardware because I know it's the monitor and not the Spyder 2. I'm saving for a larger, higher quality LCD and I'll give this Samsung to my kid to use in her college dorm.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BoySpot
Senior Member
Avatar
492 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Chicago IL
     
Jan 06, 2008 23:00 |  #7

I can support the view about leaving the settings for the colors at their defaults. When I had the non-pro version of Colorvision's software, i did adjust the colors in line with the software and I got some odd effects on the cursor color. When I upgraded to the pro version, it said LCDs are better left at their defaults and let the profile handle everything. This fixed it immediately for me. Now I just adjust the brightness in order to match my two monitors together.

Rob




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Galaxy99
Goldmember
Avatar
1,142 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: So. Cal
     
Jan 07, 2008 18:23 |  #8

I have a non-pro version too. The calibration on my DELL 22" & Samsung 22" are very inconsistent. Both them lean towards red/brown through my eyes. My question is that if it is true color of the display after calibration, or it is just a color my eyes/brain can accept based on my own judgement...

I believe the calibration for a photographer here is to reflect the true color of the image so that we can adjust it accordingly for display/print purpose. If we are not sure if the calibrated color is the REAL color on your monitor (not based on our own eyes along with different environment), what is the point to calibrate your display anyways... I am a bit doubt about the calibration tools provide what we really need here.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tapeman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Sliced Bread
Avatar
3,723 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 124
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Twin Cities
     
Jan 07, 2008 19:03 |  #9

My new monitors are Samsung 226CWs They look pretty good compaired to what I had.


Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
Gitzo 1228, 1275, 1558, Lensbaby 3G. Epson 3880, Bags that match my shoes.:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ocron
Senior Member
Avatar
297 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: MA
     
Jan 07, 2008 19:23 as a reply to  @ Tapeman's post |  #10

I have a Samsung 226CW and it's been a nightmare to calibrate; I've just about given up. My Dell 2007wfp (20") was a piece of cake. I may get a 2407wfp to replace the Samsung.


Sean

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rfreschner
ishka bibble
Avatar
2,576 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Andover, CT...................... Go Red Sox!
     
Jan 07, 2008 21:23 |  #11

Like Rob, I had problems when I first tried to calibrate using the RGB sliders on my Dell 2405FPW until I followed Colorvision's advice and just let the Spyder2 handle everything. When Dell replaced my 2405 with a 2407WFP, I didn't even bother to look to see if it had the sliders and the Spyder2 did a great job.


Rick
"We both can't be wrong; I must be right"
Bob Welch
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tapeman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Sliced Bread
Avatar
3,723 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 124
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Twin Cities
     
Jan 07, 2008 21:24 |  #12

Ocron, That's not what I wanted to hear. Were you using Spyder to calibrate?


Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
Gitzo 1228, 1275, 1558, Lensbaby 3G. Epson 3880, Bags that match my shoes.:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Jan 07, 2008 21:27 |  #13

Recalibrate with the recommended settings. User error on this one. Sorry mate.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ocron
Senior Member
Avatar
297 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: MA
     
Jan 08, 2008 05:06 |  #14

Tapeman wrote in post #4654577 (external link)
Ocron, That's not what I wanted to hear. Were you using Spyder to calibrate?

I'm using an x-rite MonacoOPTIX. I'm going to try resetting the monitor to it's defaults as suggested above and try it again. I've used the software it came with as well as ColorEyes Display Pro. If I look at the gamma test pattern here: http://www.normankoren​.com/makingfineprints1​A.html (external link) (scroll down) it's off and there is a greenish/yellow tint in the bands.


Sean

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jan 08, 2008 08:19 as a reply to  @ Ocron's post |  #15

I just received an email from from Tech Support at Colorvision. They asked me to send them the Spyder2 ICM profile created when I calibrated my 22" Samsung. I sent it off last night and I'm anxious to hear what they tell me.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,072 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Spyder 2 Pro
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1444 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.