Federkeil Senior Member 283 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2006 More info | Jan 04, 2008 15:44 | #1 I know there are a lot of you that don't like this softening effect, but I thought it lent itself well to these sweet little girls. How could I have improved the images?  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 04, 2008 15:45 | #2 This was my favorite one.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Welby Goldmember  More info | Jan 04, 2008 15:49 | #3 I like the third one but the first two make them look a little scary to me. Mark www.gravelpics.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drmonica2k Member 32 posts Joined Dec 2007 More info | Jan 04, 2008 15:52 | #4 I love these shots. I think it looks a little unnatural on the first two shots, but works well in the third shot! Unfortunately, I have no advice to offer. I'm a newbie.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
do you like the first two with a little more depth. (Like these) Or do they even look any different to you?  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hawk911 Cream of the Crop  More info | Jan 04, 2008 17:32 | #6 eyes are way overdone for me on such young girls. The third is okay. HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AndreaBFS Goldmember 1,345 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Jan 04, 2008 19:16 | #7 Yes, the eyes are problematic. Was that mostly post processing?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shannyD "...in too much trouble"  5,219 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit. More info | Jan 04, 2008 19:18 | #8 nothing against the kiddos.. they are adorable.. but the PP makes them look like the kids from village of the damned. or the children of the corn or something. lol. but they are beautiful. less is more.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yeah it's pp. These are the originals. I did the oldest girl first., then I guess I got carried away on the littler girls.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 04, 2008 19:25 | #10 Are they better as the originals? or should I be somewhere in between?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
auroraskye Goldmember  2,445 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Plano, TX More info | Jan 04, 2008 20:00 | #11 They are better as originals but they could just use a little tweaking on the coloring. One big problem I see is, I am not sure what your'e doing, but your eyes aren't blending in, it seems I can see the obvious place you had the eyes seperate and it's not blended at all.. The original edits up at the top look kind of like aliens, hehe. The original photos are gorgeous, just play with some levels/tones/etc in photoshop! I am super cool n' stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grace something cute  7,629 posts Joined May 2006 More info | Jan 04, 2008 20:00 | #12 oh my! I think the originals are way better! - Grace -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1050 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
beautiful little girls! 