rhys Dis-Membered  5,351 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2006 Location: Columbia SC More info | Jan 05, 2008 20:30 | #1 I put an ebay diffuser on my two flashguns 420EX and 430EX then took these two photos....  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 05, 2008 20:37 | #2 A better 3-Day photo  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop  23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | I have no idea of what you're trying to show us. Can you explain? Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RichNY Goldmember  1,817 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2006 More info | Jan 05, 2008 20:44 | #4 Kid's Science project? Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 05, 2008 20:51 | #5 Yes it is a child's science project. Can you tell which picture used a diffused flash? I honestly can't although I know which photo I had the ebay plant pots on my flashes. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | I'm not sure why I would want to know which image had the diffuser. I just don't get it. What is the point of shooting this image? Is there something scientific you are demonstrating? Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 05, 2008 20:59 | #7 TMR Design wrote in post #4639348  I'm not sure why I would want to know which image had the diffuser. I just don't get it. What is the point of shooting this image? Is there something scientific you are demonstrating? Even if I could tell which had the diffuser I'm just missing the point. Maybe it's me. Ignore the subject. The point is - can you even tell an ebay plant-pot diffuser was ever used? Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yogestee "my posts can be a little colourful"  More info | Jan 05, 2008 21:03 | #8 rhys wrote in post #4639366 Ignore the subject. The point is - can you even tell an ebay plant-pot diffuser was ever used? Huh???? Jurgen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me  34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Jan 05, 2008 21:05 | #9 rhys wrote in post #4639366 can you even tell an ebay plant-pot diffuser was ever used? No because they're equally harsh direct-flash crappy. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 05, 2008 21:15 | #10 cdifoto wrote in post #4639393 No because they're equally harsh direct-flash crappy. That's pretty much my opinion. I didn't figure that given their size, they would make any difference. The face is no bigger than the flash lens. The only thing they do is to reduce light output and spill some around the top, bottom and sides. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Jan 05, 2008 21:22 | #11 Show us what the diffuser looks like. I'm curious. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhilLight "manly fragrance,.. involuntarily celibate"  2,218 posts Likes: 21 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Indianapolis, IN More info | Jan 05, 2008 21:26 | #12 TMR Design wrote in post #4639348 I'm not sure why I would want to know which image had the diffuser. I just don't get it. What is the point of shooting this image? Is there something scientific you are demonstrating? Even if I could tell which had the diffuser I'm just missing the point. Maybe it's me. rhys wrote in post #4639366 Ignore the subject. The point is - can you even tell an ebay plant-pot diffuser was ever used? At the risk of speaking for Robert, I don't think he was referring to the subject. I think he was asking what was the point of the "test". Please disregard all opinions in this post
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lotto Goldmember  2,750 posts Likes: 192 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Southern California More info | Jan 05, 2008 21:33 | #13 The third one looks a bit softer, but if I was not told the diffusers were used, I would say they still look like bare flash. 5D, 24-105L, 70-200L IS, 85mm Art, Godox
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 05, 2008 21:34 | #14 cdifoto wrote in post #4639480 Show us what the diffuser looks like. I'm curious. Here you go. One fits over the 430EX and one over the 420EX.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Jan 05, 2008 21:35 | #15 Oh it's a Sto-fen wannabe. They're not made for direct flash. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is johntmyers418 1100 guests, 187 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
