Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 11 Jan 2008 (Friday) 17:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I need a reality check - 40D

 
Fabrian
Senior Member
Avatar
579 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Sebastian, Florida
     
Jan 11, 2008 17:24 |  #1

1st 40D - Had that weird intermittent shutter lag where you 1/2 press, beep, fully press and the shutter wouldn't actuate for a few seconds.

2nd 40D - Front focuses all of my lenses.

The two copies are 75 units apart. Serial numbers both begin with 0620.

I swear I'm gonna lose it. Someone tell me they can relate... :cry:


Brian
Full gear list & Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Jan 11, 2008 17:43 |  #2

Bugger.
As for your reality check, here's my view, FWIW.
I think what you are seeing is real. Canon (and quite possibly other manufacturers) are now happy to let defective products carry their name to market. My best guess is that maybe 10% are faulty in some way, so your chances of getting two duds in a row are 1 in 100.
I suspect it comes down to economics: QA/QC targets are set so at the point where it is cheaper to fix the units that are returned than to increase quality of manufacture. That works until they destroy their brand reputation, but, of course, if all manufacturers do the same thing, disgruntled consumers have no real alternative.

Anyway - 3rd time's the charm, eh?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Jan 11, 2008 17:51 |  #3

I agree. Eventually Canon will have a good database of failure modes and then they'll address the problem areas during manufacture. They still won't do any meaningful QC, but next year's 40Ds will have a substantially lower failure rate.

Next year's 1D3's too. :lol:

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fabrian
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
579 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Sebastian, Florida
     
Jan 11, 2008 17:54 |  #4

xarqi wrote in post #4683812 (external link)
Bugger.
As for your reality check, here's my view, FWIW.
I think what you are seeing is real. Canon (and quite possibly other manufacturers) are now happy to let defective products carry their name to market. My best guess is that maybe 10% are faulty in some way, so your chances of getting two duds in a row are 1 in 100.
I suspect it comes down to economics: QA/QC targets are set so at the point where it is cheaper to fix the units that are returned than to increase quality of manufacture. That works until they destroy their brand reputation, but, of course, if all manufacturers do the same thing, disgruntled consumers have no real alternative.

Anyway - 3rd time's the charm, eh?

Let's hope so. I'm almost out of excuses to keeps spending time and money on a hobby that frustrates me more than I get to enjoy due to JUNK QC.


Brian
Full gear list & Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eelnoraa
Goldmember
1,798 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
     
Jan 11, 2008 20:02 as a reply to  @ Fabrian's post |  #5

The shutter button problem seems quite common. I have problem with my less than 1 year old 30D. The shutter button assembly was replaced by Canon under warranty. My friends has had same problem with his 10D, don't know how much it costed to fix.

On contrary, my old 300D's shutter button was perfect after 2 years of use, approximately 15k clicks. My XT's is so far so good.

If you search the forums, you can find a few more people have this problems.

eel


5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brianbar
Senior Member
397 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Canada
     
Jan 11, 2008 20:26 |  #6

I had two 40D's, returned them both with front focusing issues, thank God I kept my good old faithful 10D, still going strong and MUCH sharper images straight out of the camera.
The Ser.# on the 40D's started with 2104 and 2106.
The next time I purchase a new camera, will be after it's been on the market for at least a year, I don't need the hassle, and I expect much more from a company like Canon.

Brian




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fabrian
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
579 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Sebastian, Florida
     
Jan 11, 2008 22:01 as a reply to  @ Brianbar's post |  #7

Since I'm going to take a ride over to the store I got these cameras from, I thought I might do some controlled tests to once again quadruple check that there is no user error involved.

What I came down to is the following:

Body #1: This one had the funny "sticky shutter" problem. Not only does it have that problem, but in high speed burst it'll fire off nice and fast for about 10 frames, then get real slow, as if the buffer was full already. A duplicate test on body #2 showed full speed shutter as it should. Definately defective.

Body #2: This one seemed to front focus, sometimes severe. Even worse with flash. My 30 1.4 went to complete crap on this body. After further inspection... the focus points are pretty far off from where they should be. Using a baby's doll for example - Center point focus on one eye, everything in front of the face was in focus. The actual focus point was shifted right and down, so anything shot @ 1.4 was completely EF'd.

Thanks Canon, I appreciate you taking valuble time away from me over nonsense once again...


Brian
Full gear list & Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brianbar
Senior Member
397 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Canada
     
Jan 13, 2008 11:17 |  #8

Fabrian wrote in post #4685213 (external link)
Since I'm going to take a ride over to the store I got these cameras from, I thought I might do some controlled tests to once again quadruple check that there is no user error involved.

What I came down to is the following:

Body #1: This one had the funny "sticky shutter" problem. Not only does it have that problem, but in high speed burst it'll fire off nice and fast for about 10 frames, then get real slow, as if the buffer was full already. A duplicate test on body #2 showed full speed shutter as it should. Definately defective.

Body #2: This one seemed to front focus, sometimes severe. Even worse with flash. My 30 1.4 went to complete crap on this body. After further inspection... the focus points are pretty far off from where they should be. Using a baby's doll for example - Center point focus on one eye, everything in front of the face was in focus. The actual focus point was shifted right and down, so anything shot @ 1.4 was completely EF'd.

Thanks Canon, I appreciate you taking valuble time away from me over nonsense once again...

Fabrian
Let us know your findings from the store and your own test.

Brian




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The_Camera_Poser
Goldmember
3,012 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 13, 2008 16:13 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

My wife's 30 year old A1's work like the dau they rolled off the line. It's amazing how quality is dropping. This stuff aint exactly cheap, either.

Does Noink have these problems too?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Jan 13, 2008 16:15 |  #10

xarqi wrote in post #4683812 (external link)
My best guess is that maybe 10% are faulty in some way, so your chances of getting two duds in a row are 1 in 100.
I suspect it comes down to economics: QA/QC targets are set so at the point where it is cheaper to fix the units that are returned than to increase quality of manufacture.

That's true, about the economics, but it most certainly isn't at the 10% range.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Laramie
Still livin' the cowboylife
Avatar
3,220 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Inland Empire, California
     
Jan 13, 2008 16:20 |  #11

People will argue all day long about the focus chart test, etc.

But I went through 4 40Ds that all had focus problems. And I knew it wasn't my lenses since they were all DEAD on with my old XTi. I should have stayed with my XTi, but I'm happy with my now 5th and (knock on wood) good 40D.


5DIII | 40D | 17-40 f4L | Tamron 28-75 2.8 | 50 1.4 | 70-200 2.8L | Oly Zuiko 50 macro | Tamron 1.4x

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The_Camera_Poser
Goldmember
3,012 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 13, 2008 16:24 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

This is why I'm looking to buy the 5D and not the 5D Mk II! Better the devil you know....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_B
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,351 posts
Gallery: 178 photos
Likes: 2709
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Hawaii
     
Jan 13, 2008 16:24 |  #13

Fabrian,
Sorry to hear about the bad luck. :(
Which store did you use on the island? ??? (I lived there for years).

It is possible it isn't Canons fault at all, ex. the camera has been returned and the store resold it etc...

I suggest a ride into the city (Manhattan) and go to B&H, they are the best in NY (for me).

I have had good luck with all my cameras and lenses from B&H.

Good Luck, hope all works out :)


Sony A6400, A6500, Apeman A80, & a bunch of Lenses.............  (external link)
click to see (external link)
JohnBdigital.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brianbar
Senior Member
397 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Canada
     
Jan 13, 2008 17:30 |  #14

The_Camera_Poser wrote in post #4695349 (external link)
My wife's 30 year old A1's work like the dau they rolled off the line. It's amazing how quality is dropping. This stuff aint exactly cheap, either.

Does Noink have these problems too?

I personally haven't heard of Nikon having the focusing issue, it's also interesting to note that Nikon also give a two year warranty, they must have more confidence in their equipment than Canon.

Brian




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_TX
Goldmember
1,471 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Texas
     
Jan 13, 2008 17:47 |  #15

Brianbar wrote in post #4695740 (external link)
I personally haven't heard of Nikon having the focusing issue, it's also interesting to note that Nikon also give a two year warranty, they must have more confidence in their equipment than Canon.

Brian

I've always thought the same thing. I think it boils down to arrogance on their part.
"We've got a diverse product line, so take it or leave it."
If it breaks after one year, they know you'll probably pay to get it serviced since a $1k+ lens & $2k+ body aren't exactly disposable items...

In addition, Canon must make a SUBSTANTIAL amount on service after the first year. While I've never dealt with Canon Service personally, from what I've read, you're looking at a minimum of $$150-$175 service charge after the first year for any of their DSLR items.
Seems kinda pointless to send in a Rebel or non-L lens at those prices.


5D4 | 5D3 | 16-35 f4 IS | 24-105 f4 IS | 70-200 f4 IS | 100-400 II | Sigma 20 f/1.4 ART | Sigma 35 f/1.4 ART | EF 1.4x III | EF 2x II | 430EX II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,219 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
I need a reality check - 40D
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is icebergchick
1375 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.