Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 14 Jan 2008 (Monday) 10:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Anti-Twist Plate anyone?

 
pixel_junkie
Goldmember
Avatar
2,013 posts
Likes: 143
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 14, 2008 10:09 |  #1

Hi guys,

how many of you use an anti-twist plate with your tripod/head set up?

Exxample:

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …_Twist_Quick_Re​lease.html (external link)


Website (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pturton
Senior Member
733 posts
Joined May 2002
Location: Region Niagara, Ontario, Canada
     
Jan 14, 2008 11:07 |  #2

You may have a difficult time connecting that item to your Canon body with the 3/8 inch thread of that QR. Canon uses the standard, 1/4 inch 20 pitch thread, on their camera bodies and lens feet for tripod mount. Larger format (ie. 6x6) use 3/8 16 piitch thread.

I've used similar QR systems to the one you point out - better than nothing I suppose but a PITA compared to my RRS clamps and plates I now use. Also, the vibration dampening of this Bogen style in non-existant.

Really Right Stuff, Kirk and others make much better body plates and clamps but you'll pay much $$$ for that quality and ease of use.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pixel_junkie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,013 posts
Likes: 143
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 14, 2008 11:34 |  #3

pturton wrote in post #4700588 (external link)
You may have a difficult time connecting that item to your Canon body with the 3/8 inch thread of that QR. Canon uses the standard, 1/4 inch 20 pitch thread, on their camera bodies and lens feet for tripod mount. Larger format (ie. 6x6) use 3/8 16 piitch thread.

I've used similar QR systems to the one you point out - better than nothing I suppose but a PITA compared to my RRS clamps and plates I now use. Also, the vibration dampening of this Bogen style in non-existant.

Really Right Stuff, Kirk and others make much better body plates and clamps but you'll pay much $$$ for that quality and ease of use.

I provided the wrong link but there is a 1/4 inch plate that is identical and will fit the 35 mm body.


Website (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jan 14, 2008 11:49 |  #4

When I was using the RC2 plate (don't anymore), the cork or rubber on the surface of the plate provided enough friction that I never really had a need to get an anti-twist plate for it. Of course, I never used the RC2 plate on anything heavy, though. I've since switched to the arca-style plates which can handle heavier loads, like the super-telephoto lenses, without a problem.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,320 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Jan 14, 2008 13:35 |  #5

Been there, done that. Manfrotto RC system allows for too much torguing and play. It is a proprietary system. My suggestion is an AS system. Once you try them, there is no turning back...http://www.reallyright​stuff.com/QR/02.html (external link)


Jim

My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pixel_junkie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,013 posts
Likes: 143
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 14, 2008 14:26 |  #6

jhom wrote in post #4701457 (external link)
Been there, done that. Manfrotto RC system allows for too much torguing and play. It is a proprietary system. My suggestion is an AS system. Once you try them, there is no turning back...http://www.reallyright​stuff.com/QR/02.html (external link)

Looks solid but it's pricey. That clamp system you recommend costs as much as my ballhead AND the plate together. It may be an overkill for me personally.


Website (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jan 14, 2008 15:23 |  #7

pixel_junkie wrote in post #4701862 (external link)
Looks solid but it's pricey. That clamp system you recommend costs as much as my ballhead AND the plate together. It may be an overkill for me personally.

Here's a cheaper alternative which the way I went with my 488RC2 and 486RC2 heads: http://tripodhead.com/​products/qr-clamps-main.cfm (external link)

I removed the plates and clamps from those two heads and replaced them with the Wimberley clamps and plates.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,328 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2516
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Jan 14, 2008 15:27 |  #8

[QUOTE=pturton;4700588​]You may have a difficult time connecting that item to your Canon body with the 3/8 inch thread of that QR. Canon uses the standard, 1/4 inch 20 pitch thread, on their camera bodies and lens feet for tripod mount. Larger format (ie. 6x6) use 3/8 16 piitch thread.

The Manfrotto Web Site is a pain in the butt to navigate through but, Manfrotto has this plate in a 1/4" 20 screw version which fits the tripod socket of still cameras and which fits the tripod screw hole of lens tripod rings. I found it on the Manfrotto Site yesterday but, can only find the 3/8" version today.

I bought one of these "architectural plates" for the RC2 Quick Release System years ago and the plate works very well. I don't know why they just dont supply this plate with the RC2 QR System. When I am shooting with a tripod, I will use this plate on my camera body and use the stock OEM plate on the tripod ring of my lens. That makes it easy to switch from a lens that uses a tripod ring to one which has no ring and which necessitates attaching the camera body to the tripod head.

Manfrotto also distributes an "L" bracket which should do the job. I have problems finding this on the manfrotto site also. maybe it's just me! i don't know but, I don't seem to have problems navigating through other web sites.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,089 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Anti-Twist Plate anyone?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
653 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.