Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 16 Jan 2008 (Wednesday) 12:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sandisk Extreme Reader

 
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
Avatar
3,877 posts
Gallery: 821 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5006
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Perthshire in Scotland
     
Jan 16, 2008 12:01 |  #1

Just got an Extreme cf reader, and it doesn't appear to be any faster than my old generic reader, with Extreme IV cards. Do I have to download a driver from Sandisk? The only software in the box was their recovery software. The only thing I can think of is, my old desk top pc may still be on USB 1.0 not 2.0.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CatchingUp
Goldmember
Avatar
1,842 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 406
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Texas
     
Jan 16, 2008 12:03 |  #2

You are probably correct.

I started a thread on here a week or so ago...lamenting over my slow card reading until I realized there were much faster readers. I bought the one you mentioned...and am amazed over the difference.


Tony
I use Canon gear...have several bodies and lenses and am quite pleased with them.

"A person's gift will make room for itself."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sadatk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,392 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta
     
Jan 16, 2008 12:04 |  #3

How fast does it generally transfer? My extreme II cards usually go at about 2 images/second. (16-18mb/s)

USB 2.0 as well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Jan 17, 2008 09:29 |  #4

I just bought one of those card readers and still havent even had a chance to transfer any pictures with it! Now you have me wondering if it actually is any faster.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,877 posts
Gallery: 821 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5006
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Perthshire in Scotland
     
Jan 17, 2008 11:44 |  #5

A quick update. Checked on the Sandisk site and transfer rates work out to about a minute per gig with an Extreme IV cards in this reader. That's what I'm getting from it now, so it's performing as required. Downside is, the cheapo $10 Integral reader I picked up last year is just as fast :mad: Still, it's nice n shiny...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sparksdjs
Senior Member
772 posts
Gallery: 266 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2302
Joined May 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
     
Jan 17, 2008 13:52 as a reply to  @ bildeb0rg's post |  #6

I bought one yesterday. My cheapo reader was giving me 3.8 megabytes/sec, this one gives me 15.6 with the same card, an Extreme III.

Dave


Canon 90D | 17-55 IS | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II | 70-200 f/4L IS | 1.4X TC | 35mm f/2 IS | 18-135 IS STM | 10-22mm | 10-18 IS STM | 85mm f/1.8 | 50mm f/1.4 | 580EX II | Canon G7X Mk II | Sigma AF 105 f/2.8 DG EX OS HSM Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sadatk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,392 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta
     
Jan 17, 2008 22:25 |  #7

bildeb0rg wrote in post #4722588 (external link)
A quick update. Checked on the Sandisk site and transfer rates work out to about a minute per gig with an Extreme IV cards in this reader. That's what I'm getting from it now, so it's performing as required. Downside is, the cheapo $10 Integral reader I picked up last year is just as fast :mad: Still, it's nice n shiny...

It's a limitation of usb2.0

Get their firewire reader if you want even faster.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SunTsu
Goldmember
Avatar
1,593 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Westcoast, Canada
     
Jan 17, 2008 22:55 |  #8

sadatk wrote in post #4726868 (external link)
It's a limitation of usb2.0

Get their firewire reader if you want even faster.

It is? According to the below website, TSF speeds have been recorded as high as 30MB/s

http://www.everythingu​sb.com/usb2/faq.htm (external link)


Canon 5D Mark II+BG-E6, Canon 5D+BG-E4 | 200-400mmL IS, 85mm F1.2L II, TS-E 17mm F4.0L , 16-35mm F2.8L II, 24-105mmL IS, 70-200mm [COLOR=#000000]F2.8L II IS, 100mm F2.8L Macro IS, 100mm F2.8 Macro, 40mm F2.8, 1.4x II, 2.0x III | EF12+25 II | Canon 600EX-RT (x5) | Gitzo support
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jan 17, 2008 23:19 |  #9

The problem with USB is that it uses a master/slave architecture which relays on the main processor to do much of the work. Depending on what is running at the time, available memory, and OS configuration, you may never see the theoretical speeds USB-II claims. Firewire uses a peer to peer protocol where the smarts are in the peripherals themselves. THis allows for much higher throughputs especially in sustained data transfers.

Secondly, your hard drive may also be a throttle. You may be able to get the data to the PC very quickly but it fills up the hard drive buffer and your waiting the the hard drive to write all the data. There are lots of things that can affect hard drive performance such as a single drive, lots of paging, other applications using the drive as well, a slow drive or a small buffer.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
danielyamseng
Goldmember
2,053 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Oct 2007
     
Jan 18, 2008 06:42 |  #10

gjl711 wrote in post #4727218 (external link)
The problem with USB is that it uses a master/slave architecture which relays on the main processor to do much of the work. Depending on what is running at the time, available memory, and OS configuration, you may never see the theoretical speeds USB-II claims. Firewire uses a peer to peer protocol where the smarts are in the peripherals themselves. THis allows for much higher throughputs especially in sustained data transfers.

Secondly, your hard drive may also be a throttle. You may be able to get the data to the PC very quickly but it fills up the hard drive buffer and your waiting the the hard drive to write all the data. There are lots of things that can affect hard drive performance such as a single drive, lots of paging, other applications using the drive as well, a slow drive or a small buffer.

wow, you must be a computer engineer,man:)!Anyway for max transfer use firewire connection instead.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,877 posts
Gallery: 821 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5006
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Perthshire in Scotland
     
Jan 18, 2008 13:07 |  #11

Thanks for the info guys, looks like fire wire is the next step then. John, my pc is pretty old school so you're probably right about the drive/processor choking. Theoretical transfer rates work out to 55 secs per gig and I'm getting just over a minute in real time, so it's not that far away




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MDJAK
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
24,745 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 204
Joined Nov 2004
Location: New York
     
Jan 18, 2008 20:15 |  #12

I love my Extreme Firewire reader. With the Extreme IV card, it is much faster than any USB reader I've ever used.
me




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,195 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Sandisk Extreme Reader
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1477 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.