Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 17 Jan 2008 (Thursday) 22:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is now the wrong time to go FF?

 
Fabrian
Senior Member
Avatar
579 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Sebastian, Florida
     
Jan 17, 2008 22:52 |  #1

I've found some in my boat and keep asking myself the same question over and over..

The lens lineup for FF makes so much more sense to me. I do have an opportunity between now and this weekend to return the 40D and 35L I just picked up for a new 5D and a 50 1.4.

I do shoot my kids sports and can appreciate the FOV in favor of the crop. Until sports start again in a few months, I really like the 50-ish equivilent lenght for indoors of my 2yr old. I wouldn't be able to pick up a crop and the long lens I'm still missing at the moment yet anyway.

Anyway, my point is this - I've read the 5D vs 40D threads and it seem the majority here lean towards the cropper for the ~2 years of tech and very good IQ out of the 40 (as of this point in time). Aside the 40D seemingly "winning the poll" and considering the 5D is going to be upgraded soon with a feature set that I would assume comparable to the 30-->40D improvements..

Would right now, today, be the wrong time to invest in FF? Wouldn't that be similar to going out and purchasing a 30D a few weeks before the 40D hit the shelves?

Personally, I think this 35L is wicked. I liked the Sigma 30, but I was one of the bunch that just got funky focus with it. I don't care for the IQ of the 28.. and I want a damn normal fast lens! :p

For me, I have a day or so to figure it out. 40D+35L, 40D+17-55, or FF now for new cheap and a 50 1.4. Those are the options I'm willing to consider at this point in time. Also, knowing I could actually add a 24-105 focal length sits real well with me.


Brian
Full gear list & Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
danielyamseng
Goldmember
2,053 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Oct 2007
     
Jan 18, 2008 00:42 |  #2

There's no clear answer for that but if' budget is not as issue why not:)?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
simon_says
Senior Member
306 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jan 18, 2008 01:03 |  #3

Invest in lenses before body. A wider selection of lenses will help you capture different shots, whereas a different body likely won't - especially since the 40D is already very capable.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elwood58
Senior Member
Avatar
319 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: RSM California
     
Jan 18, 2008 09:15 as a reply to  @ simon_says's post |  #4

I vote for spending money on Glass, and time on composition skills. Those two things are going to make the biggest difference in the final outcome of your efforts.


50D and a bunch of lenses (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,454 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4546
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jan 18, 2008 09:29 |  #5

The camera format analogy is like trying to decide if you want to buy a BMW 5 series or a (larger more expensive) BMW 7 series. Both get you there. One has more space to carry people and things. One costs more than the other. One has more 'status' than the other, to yourself and/or to bystanders. Both get you there. So ultimately one consideration in purchase choice is your ability to afford one vs. the other. And if you can afford either one, whether you want to spend larger sums of money on an item which ultimately depreciates larger amounts of value, or you could use that money in some other fashion better spent!!!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicoy3k@gmail.com
Member
69 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Jan 18, 2008 09:32 |  #6

35L >>> 501.4

just save money, then sell your 40D and use the 5D with the 35 L




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Jan 18, 2008 09:34 |  #7

that's really not fair Wilt.  :p its more like the M5 and the M3. significant differences in price, almost equal in performance, but both get you there! :D :D :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,454 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4546
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jan 18, 2008 09:36 |  #8

roeddel wrote in post #4729407 (external link)
that's really not fair Wilt. :p its more like the M5 and the M3. significant differences in price, almost equal in performance, but both get you there! :D :D :D

Yeah, OK you're right...40D vs. 5D... significant differences in price, almost equal in performance, and both take pictures!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SeanH
Goldmember
2,055 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2004
Location: San Diego, CA.
     
Jan 18, 2008 09:39 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #9

Personally I have money in the bank for next week. If there is even a chance that they will announce a new 5D with the same enhancements as the 30/40D change there is no way I'd buy a "old" 5D. If they don't then I'll still be very uneasy about buying the old 5D. As much as I want to go full frame the changes in the 30/40D are so good that I don't think there is that much difference in image IQ between the 40 & 5D.....unless you printing large.

......and Hell if Canon doesn't do a new 5D I might just sell everything and go with a D3.


7D ......waiting on the 5D3
10-22, 17-40 4.0 L, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8L, 2 X 580EX's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JS4KIKZ
Senior Member
Avatar
339 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Norfolk, Va (USA)
     
Jan 18, 2008 09:42 |  #10

elwood58 wrote in post #4729301 (external link)
I vote for spending money on Glass, and time on composition skills. Those two things are going to make the biggest difference in the final outcome of your efforts.


I agree with you 100%.

Although I recently upgraded from a 20D to a 40D, I still wonder if I should have bought a 5D, but I cannot express enough on how good this camera is, especially with the right lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fabrian
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
579 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Sebastian, Florida
     
Jan 18, 2008 09:42 |  #11

SeanH wrote in post #4729438 (external link)
Personally I have money in the bank for next week. If there is even a chance that they will announce a new 5D with the same enhancements as the 30/40D change there is no way I'd buy a "old" 5D. If they don't then I'll still be very uneasy about buying the old 5D. As much as I want to go full frame the changes in the 30/40D are so good that I don't think there is that much difference in image IQ between the 40 & 5D.....unless you printing large.

......and Hell if Canon doesn't do a new 5D I might just sell everything and go with a D3.

You seem to be the only one who's read the first post, Thanks for your opinion - of which I was looking for.


Brian
Full gear list & Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicoy3k@gmail.com
Member
69 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Jan 18, 2008 09:43 |  #12

what is the 40D missing that is stopping you from reaching your photographic potential?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bbbig
Senior Member
Avatar
364 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Boston, MA
     
Jan 18, 2008 09:43 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #13

A more economic alternative, is to get a 30D (may be even used) or XTi, and keep them as a future 2nd body. Or, you can go 1DMk3 now - sits between 1.6x and FF, which is excellent for sports.


Roy

5D Mark III (external link) | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS | 50 1.2L (external link) (full gear list)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
constrict
Goldmember
Avatar
1,032 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Maine
     
Jan 18, 2008 09:49 |  #14

why uneasy about buying a 5D? that would be like being uneasy about buying a 3 year old BMW that's still more luxurious than your brand new ford focus. Even if canon does announce a new 5D (with there still being MIII issues) it will take a while before it's on the market and then working out the bugs if there are any.


5D | 5DIII | 1DIV| 16-35 f2.8L II | 24-70 f2.8L II | 70-200 f2.8L IS II | 24 f1.4L II | 35 f1.4L | 50mm f1.4 | 85mm f1.2 II
http://www.tomcouture.​com (external link)| http://facebook.com/co​uturephotos (external link)
| http://instagram.com/t​omcouture (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,454 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4546
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jan 18, 2008 09:52 |  #15

Fabrian wrote in post #4729449 (external link)
You seem to be the only one who's read the first post, Thanks for your opinion - of which I was looking for.

I read it. You were saying "5D is cheap now, just before the replacement comes out. Shouldn't I get it now?"

I stand on my same answer...whether there is a 2x difference in body price or a 1.7x difference in body price, the matter is your choice...40D vs. 5D... significant differences in price, almost equal in performance, and both take pictures


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,983 views & 0 likes for this thread, 28 members have posted to it.
Is now the wrong time to go FF?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is icebergchick
1366 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.