Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 23 Jan 2008 (Wednesday) 20:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Gitzo GM-3550 Mountaineer 6X Carbon Fiber Monopod: an Initial Review

 
SYS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48475
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Jan 23, 2008 20:33 |  #1

First, a couple of images of the product:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



A quick look at the specification (from B&H):

Maximum Height: 75.6” (192 cm)
Folded Length: 21.3” (54 cm)
Weight: 1.4 lbs (600 g)
Load Capacity: 36.9 lbs (18 kg)
Leg Sections: 5
Leg Lock Type: Twist
Male Thread Size: ¼”-20 & 3/8”-16 (reversible stud)

When my Manfrotto 3245 monopod broke down on me recently, I decided to give Gitzo GM-3550 a try. Obviously when deciding on a monopod, one has to base the decision on what camera/lenses will be used on it, maximum load capacity, its weight/height, as well as one’s budget. In my case, I was looking for one that could easily handle my 70-200, 100-400, and the future 500 with the 2xTC, while light and compact enough for convenient handling and durable enough to last me a long time of heavy use. I did consider the GM-5540, but I quickly realized that the 5540 wasn’t for me for the following reasons. While it’s undoubtedly an excellent monopod: 1) it’s overkill for my current and future needs; 2) I don’t care to hold a “tree trunk;” 3) it’s shorter than the 3550; and 4) 3550 is cheaper.

One thing that both Gitzo models have in common, however, is the intriguing and innovative technology and designs that caught my fancy:

6X Carbon Fiber: Not all carbon fibers are equal in quality. The 6X carbon fiber by Gitzo is made of unique 6 crossed layers for greater rigidity, lightness, and tolerance for vibration and shock.

G-Lock and Anti-Rotation Leg System: By making the locking ring longer, the two tubes allow greater rigidity and prevent the monopod from bending. Along with this, the cone-shaped ring is designed to provide a stronger grip as vertical force is applied – the greater the gravity, the stronger its grip and the overall rigidity of the leg – hence it’s impressive 36.9 lbs load tolerance. The innovative thread concept (ARL), on the other hand, allows a mere 25% of the time that takes the traditional twist mechanism to lock/unlock the rings. In its folded position, I can simultaneously lock/unlock all four rings with a simple quarter of an inch twist.

So, are such features worth paying close to $300? For some, yes, and for some, no, I guess. As far as I’m concerned, I did spend thousands of $$$’s on my camera and lenses (and I’m not done by any means!), and I figure these expensive gear deserves a good monopod to rest on. As far as budget goes, it’s your call. Since I just received the monopod, I cannot attest to its durability, i.e., how long it will last. Only time and extended use will tell. I can, however, attest to its light but solid built, wonderful way the foam feels in my small hand, and its quick locking rings. Even my small hand could lock and unlock all four rings at the same time from the folded position.

The fully extended height is definitely more than I’d normally need, but it’s comforting to know that it IS there when in case I do need the extra height. In the meantime I simply don’t use the bottom fifth leg section until I’m vertically challenged.

Since I do lots of hiking, this light but sturdy monopod could also serve as a hiking stick. If not, its compact 21.3” of folded length could be nicely tucked inside the provided bag and stored away.

In order to use my Manfrotto 3229 Tilt Head QR for this monopod, all I had to do was to reverse the stud and I was all set. I haven’t yet looked into where I can get the interchangeable spike for the foot (for hiking or using on slippery surfaces), but it’s nice knowing that I have this useful option.

This monopod comes with a lifetime warranty, but unfortunately Gitzo doesn’t seem to be an easy company (for USA customers, anyway) to deal with when it comes to service, so I’m hoping that I don’t ever have to deal with either the service or the parts.

Apart from this bit of caveat, and based on my initial use, I’d highly recommend the product for anyone interested in this particular monopod by Gitzo.


"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48475
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Jan 24, 2008 10:09 |  #2

My "Darth Vader Monosaber." As I traverse across the digital galaxy, my Monosaber shall never leave my hand.... :lol:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jan 24, 2008 10:19 |  #3

SYS wrote in post #4771917 (external link)
My "Darth Vader Monosaber." As I traverse across the digital galaxy, my Monosaber shall never leave my hand.... :lol:

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by SYS in
./showthread.php?p=477​1917&i=i195506920
forum: Canon Accessories

Sys, nice monopod. a real work of art and for the weight is super strong. for me a monopod has to be light enough and small enough to fit in my back pocket or my camera bag and the gitzo's certainly do that.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
squiress
Senior Member
Avatar
754 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Denver, CO
     
Jan 24, 2008 20:12 |  #4

Wow, an actual Gitzo dust cover and everything. :-) Thanks for the pics.

Stew


My Stuff
Thoughts-Tripods-Ballmounts-Teardown(TD)Benro KB2 Ballmount
TD Weifeng FT-565H Ballmount-TD Benro C128, C328n6 Tripods
TD Dynatran AT-A105T Tripod-TD Benro MC-68n Monopod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zeva
Goldmember
Avatar
2,533 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
     
Jan 24, 2008 20:41 |  #5

wow this thing cost about 300?!


40D :20D: Speedlite 430ex
100-400 F/4.5-5.6 L :17-55 F/2.8 IS :28-135 F/3.5-5.6 IS: 18-55 F/3.5-5.6: 10-22 F/3.5-4.5: 70-200 F/2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48475
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Jan 24, 2008 20:42 |  #6

squiress wrote in post #4776567 (external link)
Wow, an actual Gitzo dust cover and everything. :-) Thanks for the pics.

Stew

Sounds like you're more impressed with the dust cover than the monopod itself. :lol:



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48475
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Jan 24, 2008 20:49 |  #7

zeva wrote in post #4776750 (external link)
wow this thing cost about 300?!

Yes, that's my ONLY gripe with Gitzo. In my opinion $150-$175 is more reasonable (I paid $274.99), but perhaps the company's cost for manufacturing the multi-layered carbon fiber and the G-Lock is more than I think....

I'm happy with the purchase, though. As long as the innovative ideas and designs do work as intended, then I don't mind paying the extra. I believe in rewarding innovative concepts.



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Palladium
Goldmember
3,905 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
     
Jan 24, 2008 20:57 as a reply to  @ SYS's post |  #8

...and the future 500 with the 2xTC...

You'll want the 5540 for larger lenes.

IMO the larger Gitzo give a more stable platform for the larger lenes. I think my images have improved since I've upgraded to the 5540.

Another added benefit of the carbon fibre is that it doesn't transfer the cold.

Maximum Height
63.8" (162 cm)
Folded Length
21.7" (55 cm)
Load Capacity
55 lbs (25 kg)
Leg Sections
4
Leg Lock Type
Twist
Male Thread Size
1/4"-20 & 3/8"-16 (reversible stud)
Weight
1.9 lbs (0.9 kg)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48475
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Jan 24, 2008 22:16 |  #9

Palladium wrote in post #4776872 (external link)
You'll want the 5540 for larger lenes.

IMO the larger Gitzo give a more stable platform for the larger lenes. I think my images have improved since I've upgraded to the 5540.

Yes, I have no doubt that the 5540 definitely provides a greater stability, but prior to purchasing the 3550 I did get several confirmations from those who have used the 3550 in the field that it can handle the 500 lense (8.53 lbs) + 2xTC (9.3 ounces) + camera body with battery inside (about 2 lbs). With the load capacity of 36.9 lbs, I was pretty confident that 3550 could easily handle a roughly 12-15 lbs worth of equipment sitting on top of it.

For my current and future use, I don't plan on going any heavier in substantial way, and hence my choice for the 3 series. For those who want to go with the 5540 for whatever the personal reason, you can't go wrong with the decision either as the 5540 provides everything that the 3550 does, plus greater capacity for the load.



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
legend2x
Member
33 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: NYC
     
Mar 24, 2008 17:57 |  #10

SYS wrote in post #4777364 (external link)
Yes, I have no doubt that the 5540 definitely provides a greater stability, but prior to purchasing the 3550 I did get several confirmations from those who have used the 3550 in the field that it can handle the 500 lense (8.53 lbs) + 2xTC (9.3 ounces) + camera body with battery inside (about 2 lbs). With the load capacity of 36.9 lbs, I was pretty confident that 3550 could easily handle a roughly 12-15 lbs worth of equipment sitting on top of it.

For my current and future use, I don't plan on going any heavier in substantial way, and hence my choice for the 3 series. For those who want to go with the 5540 for whatever the personal reason, you can't go wrong with the decision either as the 5540 provides everything that the 3550 does, plus greater capacity for the load.

I have been using the tripod. Now after reviewing your notes, I think the monopod is a better option for me for convenience reasons. I do have a question and hope you could help.

Do you think the 3550 is sturdy enough for the 70-200mm lens?

Thanks.


Johnny
Canon EOS 40D | Canon 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L | Canon 24mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.4 | Canon Speedlite 580ex II | Canon BG-E2N Battery Grip

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48475
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Mar 24, 2008 18:10 |  #11

legend2x wrote in post #5182653 (external link)
I have been using the tripod. Now after reviewing your notes, I think the monopod is a better option for me for convenience reasons. I do have a question and hope you could help.

Do you think the 3550 is sturdy enough for the 70-200mm lens?

Thanks.

The GM-3550 is really designed for something much heavier than the 70-200, even though it looks thin and light. In other words, for that lens (which I have) the monopod is an overkill. I'd highly recommend it, though. I use monopod exactly for the convenience reason. I'd say I use my monopod about 90% of the time and the rest on tripod (mainly for studio shoots) and handheld. Hope this helps.



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,320 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Mar 24, 2008 18:16 |  #12

I'm considering adding either the 3550 or 2540 to my gear. Can you post the lengths and approximate diameters of each section? I would think by the time you get to the last section, it will be quite thin.


Jim

My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
legend2x
Member
33 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: NYC
     
Mar 24, 2008 18:21 as a reply to  @ SYS's post |  #13

Thank you for the info. Now I just need to budget for this... almost $300.


Johnny
Canon EOS 40D | Canon 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L | Canon 24mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.4 | Canon Speedlite 580ex II | Canon BG-E2N Battery Grip

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48475
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Mar 24, 2008 19:34 |  #14

jhom wrote in post #5182781 (external link)
I'm considering adding either the 3550 or 2540 to my gear. Can you post the lengths and approximate diameters of each section? I would think by the time you get to the last section, it will be quite thin.

Here's the spec:

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …ountaineer_6X_C​arbon.html (external link)

I don't know how tall you're, but for ordinary folks the last leg section isn't going to be all that useful. But I like the fact that I can resort to the extra height when situation calls for it, like shooting over crowd or standing on a stand, chair, etc. Also, don't let the "thin" last leg section fool you. This monopod isn't expensive for no good reason.... It's made of 6 different layers of carbon fibers for extra rigidity unlike other cheaper monopods that advertise as made in "carbon fiber".....



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,320 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Mar 24, 2008 19:48 |  #15

SYS wrote in post #5183349 (external link)
Here's the spec:

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …ountaineer_6X_C​arbon.html (external link)

I don't know how tall you're, but for ordinary folks the last leg section isn't going to be all that useful. But I like the fact that I can resort to the extra height when situation calls for it, like shooting over crowd or standing on a stand, chair, etc. Also, don't let the "thin" last leg section fool you. This monopod isn't expensive for no good reason.... It's made of 6 different layers of carbon fibers for extra rigidity unlike other cheaper monopods that advertise as made in "carbon fiber".....

Unfortunately, neither the B&H or Gitzo publish the leg section dimensions.


Jim

My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

12,739 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Gitzo GM-3550 Mountaineer 6X Carbon Fiber Monopod: an Initial Review
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1355 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.