Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
Thread started 25 Jan 2008 (Friday) 10:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

to macro or not to macro

 
gardengirl13
Goldmember
Avatar
1,798 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: US
     
Jan 25, 2008 10:55 |  #1

OK I rented a macro lens and had a love hate thing going on with it. I love closeups and macro shots, but found it very frustrating. It hurt my back being hunched over the tripod for 2-3 hours. But some of my shots were fun!

here are some of the shots:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


The narrow DOF really got me. I just had a real hard time with the whole thing, but at the same time had fun. I prefer flower shots outside in natural lighting (these were bought the day I got the lens and taken in natural light from a window (the leaves and ladybug were outside) and wonder if it's worth it to get a macro lens. I've been going back and forth on this for a while. I don't need 1:1 macro just closeups and real closeups. Should I just get tubes for my 70-200? Or should I save for a macro. (I'd prefer the working distance on the 100 over the 60)

photos (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205171

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sebastianr
Senior Member
Avatar
385 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
     
Jan 25, 2008 12:48 |  #2

I love shot nr 2 and 3, nice and soft and abstract :)

Dont have a clue what you should buy, since I shoot macro with a compact myself....cheaper that way for sure :)
And extremely handy with swivel display, you DSLR guys are missing something there for sure ;)


I only do careful levels/crop/NR/colorba​lance, if needed. Thats just my philosophy, to each his own.
You're welcome to check my photoart (fotokonst in swedish) at http://sebastianfoto.s​e/ (external link)
Its swedish, but just press the menu at top for cathegories and view the photos.
I have a Canon S3 with two Raynox closeup lenses.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LordV
Macro Photo-Lord of the Year 2006
Avatar
62,298 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 6870
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Worthing UK
     
Jan 25, 2008 13:02 |  #3

Like #1 &2. Thats part of the fun with macro-shooting - the difficulty :)
Most of us here do not use tripods but end up laying on the ground and in all sorts of other odd positions :)

brian V.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/lordv/ (external link)
http://www.lordv.smugm​ug.com/ (external link)
Macro Hints and tips
Canon 600D, 40D, 5D mk2, 7D, Tamron 90mm macro, Sigma 105mm OS, Canon MPE-65,18-55 kit lens X2, canon 200mm F2.8 L, Tamron 28-70mm xrdi, Other assorted bits

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jgogums
Senior Member
729 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jan 25, 2008 13:03 |  #4

I think if you find yourself really intrigued by closeup/macro photography then buy the Canon 100 macro or similar Sigma 105 macro. I haven't spent to much time on this board lately but this is where I got virtually all my help and advice.

I don't think too many macro shooters here use a tripod. Not meaning you shouldn't, but it seems most that post here handhold or use a monopod or tall stick to help steady the camera. This allows you to still 'sway' in and out of your DOF.
It's certainly tricky but the rewards of getting a sharp image is just so addicting.

Was there a particular reason why you need to use a tripod for your floral shots?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randomgrafix
Senior Member
Avatar
545 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Republic of Trinidad & Tobago, W.I.
     
Jan 25, 2008 13:12 |  #5

no pain...no fun.
If it was easy everybody would be doing it... love the pain, it makes you appreciate the shots more.
I love the last shot best


Marlon & Nicole - "CANONS TO THE RIGHT OF THEM. CANONS TO THE LEFT OF THEM. CANONS IN FRONT OF THEM, VOLLEY'D AND THUNDER'D!"
Canon XTi &
300D/Canon 18-55/Canon 50 f1.8/Canon 70-200 f4L/Canon 70-210 f3.5-4.5/Tamron 28-300 f3.5-6.3 - Website: (external link) l POSITIVE FEEDBACK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpastern
Cream of the Crop
13,765 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
     
Jan 25, 2008 18:17 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

Good start, I quite like #2 and #4 - nice curves and lighting, so well done.

As to tripod, few of us use them, too cumbersome. Shooting handheld does make it a bit harder, but like anything in life it takes practice and patience. Keep at it, you'll get better, and will become addicted like us.

Dave


http://www.macro-images.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gardengirl13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,798 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: US
     
Jan 28, 2008 07:45 |  #7

randomgrafix wrote in post #4781310 (external link)
no pain...no fun.
If it was easy everybody would be doing it... love the pain, it makes you appreciate the shots more.
I love the last shot best

Actually the last shot was my first ever with this lens.

I needed a tripod for these because It was in Dec and there are no flowers outside and inside I don't have lights (well photo studio lights) so in order to get any shot I needed the tripod.

I'm still thinking of the 100. My husband wants me to buy it because he said even though I was getting frustrated he said I still was having fun! I'm not keeping the 70-200 (not as nice of a lens as my 200 prime is) so I'm thinking of trading it for the macro.

I guess I'll have to keep looking around. My 2 main subjects are birds (which this spring I'm hoping to have saved enough for a 400) and flowers. I mostly putter around the garden, so I also buy funky plants every year to photograph. Plus I go hiking and take nature walks around our local mansions that have wonderful gardens!

If anyone has any non macro flower shots with the 100 I'd really REALLY appreciate it. I'll also be looking around a bit on the 100 thread in the lens archive and on pbase.

Thanks again everyone!!


photos (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205171

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randomgrafix
Senior Member
Avatar
545 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Republic of Trinidad & Tobago, W.I.
     
Jan 28, 2008 08:44 |  #8

gardengirl13 wrote in post #4798924 (external link)
I'm still thinking of the 100. My husband wants me to buy it because he said even though I was getting frustrated he said I still was having fun! I'm not keeping the 70-200 (not as nice of a lens as my 200 prime is) so I'm thinking of trading it for the macro.

Try tubes first. The 100mm is a great lens but you my still need tubes for really close macros. I bought some manual tubes for $13US on Ebay.

I took some shots at home this weekend indoors.
Here's how the tubes perform with the 70-200 f4L.:wink:


Marlon & Nicole - "CANONS TO THE RIGHT OF THEM. CANONS TO THE LEFT OF THEM. CANONS IN FRONT OF THEM, VOLLEY'D AND THUNDER'D!"
Canon XTi &
300D/Canon 18-55/Canon 50 f1.8/Canon 70-200 f4L/Canon 70-210 f3.5-4.5/Tamron 28-300 f3.5-6.3 - Website: (external link) l POSITIVE FEEDBACK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gardengirl13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,798 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: US
     
Jan 28, 2008 10:30 |  #9

But I'm not looking for real close macros, only close ups and some macro work. The 70-200 is no where near as sharp as my 200. I tested it all weekend long in different lighting, different subjects. The only thing that was better is low shutter speeds due to the IS. I don't shoot that range in low light so I figured I'd save the money and stick with my prime.

I tried tubes when I first got the camera and had fun, but got very frustrated with the lack of infinity focus. I'd be out shooting flowers and a great butterfly would stop near by but just out of range and I'd miss it every time. Getting closer would just scare it away.


photos (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205171

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
32,921 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 46457
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Jan 28, 2008 10:47 |  #10

Some nice abstract flower petal shots there GG, the ladybird was a surprise thematically. :)

The focus looks good on the ladybug with the eyes and the front part of the Electra nicely in focus, always tricky with these.

My favorite has to be the first one with the wet leaves, nice light and colour.


My Photography Home Page (external link)
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr (external link) Flickr Home (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Pham
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,102 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: St. Paul MN
     
Jan 28, 2008 11:13 as a reply to  @ Lester Wareham's post |  #11

really like the flower shot. and yep it can get pretty annoying getting down low at time.

Bill


winning is fun and second is for loser
I got Mitch hook on wide angle :lol::lol:
Gear list
http://billpham.smugmu​g.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gardengirl13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,798 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: US
     
Jan 28, 2008 11:46 |  #12

I still can't figure out how you guys handhold all your great shots!


photos (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205171

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
32,921 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 46457
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Jan 30, 2008 06:37 |  #13

gardengirl13 wrote in post #4800287 (external link)
I still can't figure out how you guys handhold all your great shots!

Stop breathing ;)

Turn up the ISO if you have to.

With a 100mm macro on a APS-C crop camera for example for reasonable sharpness handheld at infinity focus you need a shuter speed of 1/100/1.6=1/160 sec using the 1/f rule.

Now at life size the angle of view of the lens is about half what it is at infinity focus so the minimum shutter speed you need is 1/160/1.6/2=1/320 sec. Preferably faster.

I often use 1/400 or 1/500 if I can, 1/320 in I am in trouble anything below that is hit or miss.

Having said that for flowers I use a tripod if I can (location permitting, public gardens etc can be a problem), partly for stability and partly for composition control.


My Photography Home Page (external link)
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr (external link) Flickr Home (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
macro ­ junkie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,709 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Somerset - UK
     
Jan 30, 2008 06:47 as a reply to  @ Lester Wareham's post |  #14

none of us use tripods..i never use them.


Uk prayingmantis forum - http://www.dragonscres​t.co.uk/forums/index.p​hp (external link)
My flickr gallery -http://www.flickr.com/​photos/hooked_on_macro​/ (external link)
DA Gallery where i sell prints - http://macrojunkie.dev​iantart.com/ (external link)
MPE-65MM - MT-24EX Twin Macro Flash (diffused with 2 X Gary Fong Puffer diffuser)
EF-S 60mm f2.8 USM - 430ex (diffused with lumeriqest soft box)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
macro ­ junkie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,709 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Somerset - UK
     
Jan 30, 2008 06:49 |  #15

gardengirl13 wrote in post #4800287 (external link)
I still can't figure out how you guys handhold all your great shots!

iso 100-200
fstop 8-16
shutter speed 200
learn to hold your breath..lol
learn good positions!

see how im leaning my right elbow on my right leg..using it as a tripod..below that is shot i got using this method

IMAGE: http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1115/1126289115_fcad803602_b.jpg
IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2222/1751983359_9103e56d2e_b.jpg

Uk prayingmantis forum - http://www.dragonscres​t.co.uk/forums/index.p​hp (external link)
My flickr gallery -http://www.flickr.com/​photos/hooked_on_macro​/ (external link)
DA Gallery where i sell prints - http://macrojunkie.dev​iantart.com/ (external link)
MPE-65MM - MT-24EX Twin Macro Flash (diffused with 2 X Gary Fong Puffer diffuser)
EF-S 60mm f2.8 USM - 430ex (diffused with lumeriqest soft box)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,287 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
to macro or not to macro
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
1377 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.