Should i just send them the image or wait until an agreement is made about payment. (assuming they decide to use my image)
I called them last week and the sports editor told me just to email the largest version of the image i could.
timmyquest Goldmember 4,172 posts Joined Dec 2003 Location: Outside of Chicago More info | Oct 02, 2004 23:32 | #1 Permanent banShould i just send them the image or wait until an agreement is made about payment. (assuming they decide to use my image) Capturing life a fraction of a second at a time
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robertwgross Cream of the Crop 9,462 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2002 Location: California More info | Oct 03, 2004 00:26 | #2 If you think about it, the newspaper is unlikely to agree to pay real money for something if they haven't seen it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 03, 2004 01:51 | #3 Permanent banrobertwgross wrote: If you think about it, the newspaper is unlikely to agree to pay real money for something if they haven't seen it. ---Bob Gross--- Obviously but I wouldn’t want them to be under the impression that me sending a 4mp image to them is considered a donation. Capturing life a fraction of a second at a time
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sGu Goldmember 2,372 posts Joined May 2004 Location: Manchester, UK More info | Oct 03, 2004 06:29 | #4 when email them the photo, make sure you state in the content of email that if they ever gonna use the image you provided, you reserve the copyright of the photo and a payable usage fee applies with 4 weeks of publishing it. Beautifully Ordinary | Gu Photography | Still + Motion Pictures
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robertwgross Cream of the Crop 9,462 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2002 Location: California More info | Oct 03, 2004 12:20 | #5 timmyquest wrote: ... Is your only goal to come off condescending or were you actually trying to make a point? Because if it's the latter then I think I missed it, sorry. My point is that the newspaper is unlikely to agree to pay real money for something if they haven't seen it (at all). Once they see it, they can decide whether or not it is worthy of a price, or even whether or not it meets the editorial intention of the sports/news article. Unfortunately, now the time has passed, so they are unlikely to take any action even if the shot is excellent.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 03, 2004 20:55 | #6 Permanent ban[QUOTE="robertwgross"] timmyquest wrote: Unfortunately, now the time has passed, so they are unlikely to take any action even if the shot is excellent. ---Bob Gross--- Your wrong as it is a weekly paper and i have until tuesday, but thank you for your insight. Capturing life a fraction of a second at a time
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IndyJeff Goldmember 1,892 posts Likes: 9 Joined Oct 2003 Location: Indianapolis, IN More info | Oct 04, 2004 02:59 | #7 Generally the way it works is like this, you send them the photo. They decide whether or not they want to use it. Then you discuss payment. My guess would be that you call them after you send it and discuss if they are going to use it how much will they pay. My guess is if it is a weekly your not going to get much over $10-15 if anything at all. On shooting sports...If you see it happen then you didn't get it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikedewitt Hatchling 6 posts Joined Aug 2004 More info | Oct 04, 2004 07:50 | #8 Contact the photo editor and ask. There are three considerations: A. Photo content, quality and relevance. B. Compensation. C. Confidence. If the photo content is unique and relelvant, it's a good bet you'll get B. Paid. The paper is certain to have terms regarding ownership of the image once you agree to sell it and these are generally spelled out in a contract present to you. Most papers have paid photo staff and tight budgets so your stuff will have to be very good and very unique. C. is a foot in the door thing. Once they have a confidence in your ability to deliver quality and content and once a fee for your work is contractually establihed, you'll likely see some addtional work. Again, they are not likely to use your stuff if the content is competing with good staff art. Good Luck.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Oct 04, 2004 08:05 | #9 If you're concerned, send them a low-res copy with a cover that you can provide the higher resolution version if they're interested. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 04, 2004 08:58 | #10 Permanent banmikedewitt wrote: Contact the photo editor and ask. There are three considerations: A. Photo content, quality and relevance. B. Compensation. C. Confidence. If the photo content is unique and relelvant, it's a good bet you'll get B. Paid. The paper is certain to have terms regarding ownership of the image once you agree to sell it and these are generally spelled out in a contract present to you. Most papers have paid photo staff and tight budgets so your stuff will have to be very good and very unique. C. is a foot in the door thing. Once they have a confidence in your ability to deliver quality and content and once a fee for your work is contractually establihed, you'll likely see some addtional work. Again, they are not likely to use your stuff if the content is competing with good staff art. Good Luck.
Capturing life a fraction of a second at a time
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lucabrazzi Member 37 posts Joined Oct 2004 Location: Surrey More info | Oct 08, 2004 16:25 | #11 Similar question...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1693 guests, 139 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||