Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 27 Jan 2008 (Sunday) 07:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Photogenic StudioMax III or Alien Bees 800

 
reelly1
Member
Avatar
198 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 27, 2008 07:52 |  #1

OK guys I am shopping for a some lights to put out in the Recreation Room. I will just be taking portraits of kids and family. In my price range (800-900) I have narrowed it down to the Photogenic StudioMAxIII AK320 or the Alien Bees 800.

I was thinking either the Alien Bees digi bee kit with two Alien A800's.

or

This Photogenic kit from BH
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …_II_3_Light_Por​trait.html (external link)

With ALien Bees I get wireless tranmiters and two year warranty, but with Photogenic I get three monolights for same price with a one year warranty.

ANybody have any good advice?? Anybody had the experience of using both??
Thanks~


7DMKII, 7D, Sig 150-600 Sport, 400 5.6L, 70-200 F4L, Sigma 17-70, 50 1.8, Kenco 1.4, Canon 430 EX, Calumet Genesis Monolights and Speedotron Brownline Strobe kit and a growing wish list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichNY
Goldmember
Avatar
1,817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jan 27, 2008 14:11 |  #2

The Photogenics will give you more consistent color temperature and can also work with small, lightweight, and inexpensive AC batteries rather than having to lug a 20lb Vagabond battery around if you want to use your gear outside.


Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
magicmikey
Goldmember
Avatar
1,027 posts
Likes: 37
Joined Feb 2005
     
Jan 27, 2008 14:45 |  #3

RichNY wrote in post #4793590 (external link)
The Photogenics will give you more consistent color temperature ...

Is this documented somewhere? (i.e. Have you tested them or have you seen a test of them?)

Thanks,
Michael




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichNY
Goldmember
Avatar
1,817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jan 27, 2008 16:39 |  #4

Mike- Consistent color as compared to Alien Bees is such a major selling major selling feature for the Photogenic strobes that they've incorporated the term Constant Color into their product name. They have half the color range than Alien Bee strobes.
http://www.photogenicp​ro.com …M_ID=179&DEPART​MENT_ID=83 (external link)


Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
magicmikey
Goldmember
Avatar
1,027 posts
Likes: 37
Joined Feb 2005
     
Jan 27, 2008 17:39 |  #5

RichNY wrote in post #4794480 (external link)
Mike- Consistent color as compared to Alien Bees is such a major selling major selling feature for the Photogenic strobes that they've incorporated the term Constant Color into their product name. They have half the color range than Alien Bee strobes.
http://www.photogenicp​ro.com …M_ID=179&DEPART​MENT_ID=83 (external link)

They may very well do a much better job with color consistency but I would rather read an independent review than see the manufacturer's claims. I know you're not very enthusiastic about the Alienbees inconsistent color used at less than 1/8 power (I've read the other threads) but a quick search on the consistency of the Photogenic light did not turn up any real review.

I did find this comment from someone who uses them:

"A couple of caveats: The flash time is long - as much as 1/125 second, so you have to be careful of the sync speed. Secondly, they have a rather long recycle time - about 6 seconds with a Turbo battery. Finally, there is little or no power regulation and the color temperature changes as you reduce the power level (this is typical except in very high-end flash units)." That came from here: http://photo.net …a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00H0sp (external link)

Again, I'm not saying the Photogenic StudioMax III are not color-consistent throughout their power range nor am I saying they're not good lights, I'm just saying I haven't seen anything that verified they're consistency.

As was mentioned in another thread, color consistency when reducing the power output of a strobe has never been a strong point of any of the lower-priced studio strobes. Everything I've read indicates you have to buy a high end strobe for that kind of consistency. In addition, the color temperature a strobe will change as it ages.

Michael




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichNY
Goldmember
Avatar
1,817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jan 27, 2008 17:56 |  #6

Mikey- Since we KNOW for a fact that Alien Bees aren't color consistent beyond 4 stops would you dump your strobes and buy anything better if you saw proof that the Photogenic Studio Maxes are more consistent?

(Paul Buff's claim that they have a 6 stop range is pure consumer fraud- they NEVER work properly at those last two stops. If his advertising wasn't deceptive in this regard I think that the only negative comment we would see posted all over the Internet is that they just aren't consistent from pop to pop.)


Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ueb0258
Senior Member
498 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Nashvegas
     
Jan 27, 2008 18:06 |  #7

I have a couple of the older StudioMaxII's 320's and I love them. Got them for a great deal on ebay. They come up from time to time. I am looking for another to fill out 3 lights at the moment.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
magicmikey
Goldmember
Avatar
1,027 posts
Likes: 37
Joined Feb 2005
     
Jan 27, 2008 18:09 |  #8

RichNY wrote in post #4794995 (external link)
Mikey- Since we KNOW for a fact that Alien Bees aren't color consistent beyond 4 stops would you dump your strobes and buy anything better if you saw proof that the Photogenic Studio Maxes are more consistent?

(Paul Buff's claim that they have a 6 stop range is pure consumer fraud- they NEVER work properly at those last two stops. If his advertising wasn't deceptive in this regard I think that the only negative comment we would see posted all over the Internet is that they just aren't consistent from pop to pop.)

I don't own Alienbees. I own White Lightning X-Series srobes, which are reportedly more consistent at lower power levels. (Paul even says that, although I haven't tested them myself.)

I'm not trying to defend Alienbees or Paul C. Buff. I understand there are some limitations to the Bees but I would like to see evidence that there is a comparably-priced strobe that exceeds the color consistency of the Alienbees before I would make a recommendation to someone to buy something else.

It's fine to warn people that Alienbees are inconsistent below 1/8th power but recommending another strobe that "will give you more consistent color temperature" when you haven't any direct knowledge of that consistency doesn't seem right.

I'm not trying to start another war here. :) All I want is accuracy in making claims about equipment. And, yes I would highly recommend the Photogenic StudioMax III strobes if I knew they were more consistent and didn't have other shortcomings. I can't say I would dump my White Lightnings because I don't know that they have that problem.

Michael




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichNY
Goldmember
Avatar
1,817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jan 27, 2008 19:58 |  #9

magicmikey wrote in post #4795060 (external link)
I don't own Alienbees. I own White Lightning X-Series srobes, which are reportedly more consistent at lower power levels. (Paul even says that, although I haven't tested them myself.)

Mike- I've never tested or used WL but I'm glad to hear that they don't have the same design flaw as the Alien Bees. It is really a shame that they do since the White Lightnings came first and there must have been a blatant disregard for future Alien Bee customers to take something that worked and turned it into something that doesn't (at up to the 6 stops advertised)

Robert and I will be doing some extensive testing on Friday of several major brands of lights and will post the results.

I'm willing to let this issue rest for a few days until we can get the data uploaded.


Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
reelly1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
198 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 27, 2008 21:07 as a reply to  @ RichNY's post |  #10

Thanks Rich and Mikey! Always love to hear a good debate :) At this point I am still leaning towards the Photogenics since i can get three lights for the sane price.

However I do like the fact that everyone raves about AB customer service. And the fact that they offer a two year warranty.

On the otherhand I have heard a lot of positves on the Photogenics for the money as well. I would love to hear from someone who has the Studiomax
III though, anybody??

Rich I would love to see your results! Please post them.

oh and thanks ueb258.


7DMKII, 7D, Sig 150-600 Sport, 400 5.6L, 70-200 F4L, Sigma 17-70, 50 1.8, Kenco 1.4, Canon 430 EX, Calumet Genesis Monolights and Speedotron Brownline Strobe kit and a growing wish list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
magicmikey
Goldmember
Avatar
1,027 posts
Likes: 37
Joined Feb 2005
     
Jan 27, 2008 21:25 |  #11

Assuming Rich's test shows the StudioMax lights are more consistent, the other consideration will be the cost of accessories. I haven't checked the cost of Photogenic's accessories but I know a lot of other brand's accessories are significantly more expensive than those that Paul C. Buff sells. (Now, some of Buff's accessories are less expensive for a reason. Some are cheaply made.)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
reelly1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
198 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 27, 2008 21:31 |  #12

Ah,good thought Mikey, thanKS! I will look into that


7DMKII, 7D, Sig 150-600 Sport, 400 5.6L, 70-200 F4L, Sigma 17-70, 50 1.8, Kenco 1.4, Canon 430 EX, Calumet Genesis Monolights and Speedotron Brownline Strobe kit and a growing wish list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichNY
Goldmember
Avatar
1,817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jan 27, 2008 22:43 |  #13

When it comes to accessories I think that most will agree it is best to buy Impact light stands and Photoflex softboxes as opposed to PB products for the reason Mickey gave. That said the one really good value that I saw was the AB speedring which did the same job of slightly more expensive products from competitors.

It really is a moot point however since you can buy an AB softbox to be used with other strobes if you wanted to. When it comes to modifiers they are mostly brand interchangeable.


Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Milner
Senior Member
336 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: City of Salt
     
Jan 27, 2008 23:15 as a reply to  @ RichNY's post |  #14

I have been going back and forth and researching lights for about 3 months now. I have read forums and reviews until my eyes are blury....In the end it comes down to this, the pro's I respect most (locally) shoot with Photogenics. And PB's attitude and some of the stuff I have read about him just doesn't set well with me. Customer service doesn't help if you need your lights to work NOW. The pros I know trust Photgenic and have for MANY years....


TOYS, Enjoy your life everyday!!!!
Camera suff: 40D, 100-400L, 70-200 2.8L non-is, 24-70L, nifty 50, Tokina 11-16, ex580 X2, A2 for that icky film stuff. Lights=Photogenic 1250's x2 and Norman ml400 x2.
Cars: 73 Bronco Buggy, 95 F250 PSD, 06 Liberty CRD, 49 Studebaker PU

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
magicmikey
Goldmember
Avatar
1,027 posts
Likes: 37
Joined Feb 2005
     
Jan 27, 2008 23:16 |  #15

Actually, I was referring to the cost of standard reflectors, beauty dishes and honeycomb grids.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,767 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Photogenic StudioMax III or Alien Bees 800
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1042 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.