This was the original image:
And this is how it looked after perspective 'correction':
To me both feel wrong but in different ways, so I am wondering which version other people prefer?
Any comments would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Michael.
| POLL: "Which version do you prefer?" |
 The original version.. | 26 92.9% |
| The corrected version. | 2 7.1% |
Jan 27, 2008 09:55 | #1 This was the original image: And this is how it looked after perspective 'correction': To me both feel wrong but in different ways, so I am wondering which version other people prefer? Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks, Michael. Comments, bribes, criticism, bribes, irrelevant anecdotes, and bribes always welcome.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop  20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Jan 27, 2008 09:59 | #2 To me, the first looks a lot more natural. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mike-DT6 Goldmember  3,963 posts Likes: 4 Joined Oct 2007 Location: The Jurassic Coast, Dorset, England. More info | Jan 27, 2008 10:25 | #3 I voted for the first one. The 'correction' on the second one makes the walls look as if they are leaning outwards towards the edge of the photograph.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Soliz387 Senior Member  879 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas More info | Jan 27, 2008 10:46 | #4 keep originals uncorrected. . Canon 50D, Sigma 70-200 2.8, Sigma 150 Macro
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dorman Goldmember  4,661 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: Halifax, NS More info | Jan 27, 2008 13:04 | #5 The 1st uncorrected image looks more natural to me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aia21 Member  205 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: England, UK More info | Jan 27, 2008 16:23 | #6 The uncorrected (1st) looks better to me. The second one is just weird. 7D | 40D | 17-55 f/2.8 IS + hood | 70-200 f/4L IS | 580EX II | 2x Vivitar 285 | IXUS 860IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 28, 2008 04:22 | #7 It is looking unanimous then! Thanks for the comments. Comments, bribes, criticism, bribes, irrelevant anecdotes, and bribes always welcome.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kevin_c Cream of the Crop 5,745 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Devon, England More info | Jan 30, 2008 14:52 | #8 Definitely the first (original) - the 'corrected' one just looks wrong IMO -- K e v i n --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 30, 2008 17:08 | #9 I just don't like the composition, period. ~ Clint :: Galleries
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 31, 2008 14:02 | #10 rowdyred94 wrote in post #4818137  I just don't like the composition, period.  It seems too cut off on the bottom.That is a fair point. And one side of the building being longer than the other I think the lack of symmetry in this case works against the composition too. Comments, bribes, criticism, bribes, irrelevant anecdotes, and bribes always welcome.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joeseph "smells like turd"  More info | Feb 01, 2008 05:56 | #11 I don't have a problem with altering perspective (depends on the image really) but I think the shown "corrected" perspective isn't really correct - the converging parallels are okay but verticals should be just that: vertical.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. (not quite right, but you get the idea) some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1043 guests, 105 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
