Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 04 Oct 2004 (Monday) 05:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Photoshop raw to jeg

 
alpine62uk
Member
136 posts
Joined Aug 2004
     
Oct 04, 2004 05:27 |  #1

Can anyone help?

I have just converted 10 photo from my last shoot to Jpeg. When I converted I kept all the setting to maximum to ensure keeping as much detail as poss. When the conversion was finished i notice each photo had reduced from the 8 meg original to 4 meg.

Is this normal for such a reduction in meg or have I done something wrong during the conversion?

Thanks Antony


5d Mk 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thomascanty
Bold. Pink.
Gone, but not forgotten.
Avatar
38,071 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Temporarily Retired
     
Oct 04, 2004 05:38 |  #2

Yes, that's normal. JPG is a lossy format. You should be converting to TIFF if you want to make sure you keep all data intact. Your file size will be much larger as a TIFF.


My name is Lonnie, but I answer to Thomas too.
LDPhotography.net (external link) | Weekly Pioneer (external link) | Facebook (external link)
"Young at heart. Slightly older in other parts."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aam1234
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Oct 04, 2004 11:21 |  #3

Is the Tiff step necessary?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Oct 04, 2004 11:36 |  #4

TIFF as an end format, not an intermediate step. TIFF is a "lossless" compression, where Jpeg is a "lossy" compression. Every time you re-save a JPEG, some further compression (and loss of detail) will occur. By saving your edited files as TIFF, you eliminate this problem.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aam1234
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Oct 04, 2004 12:45 |  #5

Thanks,

So it's Raw-Jpeg-Tiff?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thomascanty
Bold. Pink.
Gone, but not forgotten.
Avatar
38,071 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Temporarily Retired
     
Oct 04, 2004 12:48 |  #6

aam1234 wrote:
Thanks,

So it's Raw-Jpeg-Tiff?

For me it's Raw->TIFF. Jpeg is for the final image when I want to put it on the web. If you go from Raw to Jpeg, you're throwing away detail in the compression. Going from there to TIFF isn't going to get that detail back.


My name is Lonnie, but I answer to Thomas too.
LDPhotography.net (external link) | Weekly Pioneer (external link) | Facebook (external link)
"Young at heart. Slightly older in other parts."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,167 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Photoshop raw to jeg
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1012 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.