New Sigmas 120-400 OS v 150-500 OS v Canon 100-400 IS

wimg wrote in post #5580997
To make it more clear: from the picture it looks similar to a 170-500, to me anyway ...

Looks nothing like it. Go check the Sigma web site. I suppose it is black and long and it zooms

wimg wrote in post #5581123
... I expressed my opinion.[/B][/I] I do hope I have the right to an opinion, or would you say otherwise?

Everyone has right to an opinion and when an opinion is clearly mistaken, as in this case, then everyone has a right to challenge it

condyk wrote in post #5581212
Looks nothing like it. Go check the Sigma web site. I suppose it is black and long and it zooms

I'll have a look, later.

Everyone has right to an opinion and when an opinion is clearly mistaken, as in this case, then everyone has a right to challenge it

I agree. I don't agree when it gets personal if it is not warranted, like "There you go again dismissing lenses" etc. I don't particularly like personalized generalizations. Even so, we all do "dismiss" things, based on personal experience, likes, dislikes, needs and requirements.

Kind regards, Wim

Canon 100-400 IS

sai-gon-xua wrote in post #5582010
Canon 100-400 IS

Ditto

Could we call it the SOB ?

https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=5783752#p​ost5783752 I compared them!