Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 01 Feb 2008 (Friday) 00:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lens adapters for EOS (Nikon, M42, adaptors, etc)

 
TheShootist
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Feb 01, 2008 00:45 |  #1

I've done my best to search for this info (here and elsewhere) but I didn't find all the info, so I'll post what I've found and my questions, and some kind soul can point me to a previous thread if I've missed it.

With lens adapters for EOS cameras (specifically I'm getting a Nikon-EOS first) are there brands or features that make one clearly superior to others?

From reading different threads, I've gathered that there are some differences:

THICKNESS
Too thick: it won't focus at infinity
Just right: well...it's just right :) (precision machining usually costs more)
Too think: it will focus at infinity but the lens markings might not match true focus distances and DOFs

MATERIALS
aluminum: cheap, soft?, easy to damage?
bronze: anything advertised as "bronze" on ebay is probably not
others?

CHIPPED OR NO CHIP
adapters with chips will allow for the AF light to be used. Some people have found this useful and others not so much. Is it worth the cost, or better to get a "dumb" adapter for each lens?
Some sellers advertise that their chips are "glued better" than their competition. Has anyone ever had any problems?
Also there is always the possibility that a chip could negatively affect the camera's electronics. Is this really a possibility?

OTHER
any other characteristics that I missed?

In the end, are there really significant differences among the various adaptors, especially those found on eBay? Anybody have some that they have used and really recommend?

Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Feb 01, 2008 00:58 |  #2

Seen this thread?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
labbai
Member
Avatar
248 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Turku, Finland
     
Feb 01, 2008 01:27 |  #3

Hama has adapters for Canon EOS: http://www.hama.de/ind​ex.hsp (external link)
Also here is a great article about mounting manual lenses with EOS: http://photonotes.org/​articles/eos-manual-lenses/ (external link)
Anyways, I ordered an adapter to my father for his old FD lenses that will focus at infinity. http://www.hama.de …chMode*1/bySear​ch*eos+fd+ (external link)
I think Hama has all kind of adapters for the EOS. :D


Canon, Gitzo, RRS, Zeiss, Pelenghttp://labbai.blogspot​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
labbai
Member
Avatar
248 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Turku, Finland
     
Feb 01, 2008 01:29 |  #4

xarqi wrote in post #4827974 (external link)
Seen this thread?

Got to read it!:D


Canon, Gitzo, RRS, Zeiss, Pelenghttp://labbai.blogspot​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheShootist
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Feb 01, 2008 01:37 |  #5

xarqi wrote in post #4827974 (external link)
Seen this thread?

Yes, Thanks. I mined it for what I could. I didn't find too many specifics on the differences between different brands/sellers/manufac​turers.

Most of the auctions (are there ones in online stores?) seem to be rather identical. Should I just by the cheapest thinking that it will work the same as the more expensive? (i.e. cheapest chipped or cheapest non-chipped.)

thansk




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Feb 01, 2008 01:56 |  #6

Fair enough.
All I can offer is my own experience with one specific eBay vendor. The product I received was advertised as plated brass and from its mass, it certainly isn't aluminium. It was shipped promptly, arrived well packaged, and works exactly as described. The only qualm I had was that while the total price was reasonable, I thought ($US50 shipped), the actual division between product and shipping had been fudged (shipping charged was $US10, but actual postage was more like $US2), basically to cheat eBay.
Apparently that ruse is not uncommon.

It looks like he has what you are after (external link) for $50 shipped.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheShootist
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Feb 01, 2008 03:04 |  #7

xarqi wrote in post #4828167 (external link)
Fair enough.
All I can offer is my own experience with one specific eBay vendor. The product I received was advertised as plated brass and from its mass, it certainly isn't aluminium. It was shipped promptly, arrived well packaged, and works exactly as described. The only qualm I had was that while the total price was reasonable, I thought ($US50 shipped), the actual division between product and shipping had been fudged (shipping charged was $US10, but actual postage was more like $US2), basically to cheat eBay.
Apparently that ruse is not uncommon.

It looks like he has what you are after (external link) for $40 shipped.

thanks xarqi, he's on vacation starting tomorrow, so I'll probably see if I can find something similar in the next ten days.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Feb 01, 2008 06:58 |  #8

one of mine from Big_IS wouldn't lock on to my lenses, so the vender sent me a new one, asking only that I send the defecto back...let me keep the back lens cap to defray the postage....
on another, the screws holding the two halves together came loose and lost...replaced by a local, no problem...just keep aware of them...
on my 135mm lens the point of focus is when the LED goes OUT as I turn the barrel towards infinity...oh well, at least it's consistent.


My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Katzer1
Senior Member
535 posts
Joined Nov 2006
     
Feb 01, 2008 08:17 |  #9

I have 2 BIG_IS adapters: M42 and Nikon.
The Nikon seems fine.
The M42 (older version) is too thin, I can focus "beyond" infinity and it throws the distance scale off. No Aperture flange, which gets annoying sometimes.
They were very cheaply made, even though BIG_IS has newer models, I don't think I am going to buy his stuff again.
I also have a ericcc1006 C/Y adapter which is just fine. He is also very responsive seller. I wish he made an M42 with an aperture flange though, maybe he does now.
All of the above are made of aluminum and have an AF confirm chip.


Erez Katz, www.pbase.com/katzer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Feb 01, 2008 08:36 |  #10

http://www.16-9.net/lens_tests/compa​tible.html (external link)

Here's a good article to read and list of adapter soucres. My favorite is Fotodiox.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheShootist
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Feb 02, 2008 15:27 as a reply to  @ gasrocks's post |  #11

Thanks all for posting their experiences.

And thanks gasrocks for that link. I hadn't seen that list--very helpful.

Anyone else want to weigh in with recommendations of adapters to get (or avoid)?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,208 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Lens adapters for EOS (Nikon, M42, adaptors, etc)
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1727 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.