Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 07 Oct 2004 (Thursday) 10:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

ACDsee 7

 
aam1234
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Oct 07, 2004 10:23 |  #1

Anybody tried it, is it worth the upgrade (from 6.03).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aericj
Goldmember
Avatar
1,240 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Louisville, K USA
     
Oct 07, 2004 10:39 |  #2

I used the 6.03 trial but never bought and have since been using the 7.0 trial. It is MUCH faster than 6.03 and the enhancements seem very nice, as well - especially the ability to read RAW files. Once you download the trial they start sending special offers.

No trouble transferring previous database to the new version. I am waiting to buy until after I get my Elements 3 and check out its categorizing capabilities. I have a feeling I will be buying the ACDSee 7, though, as it seems like a great product.


Canon Ti5 w/ 18-135 IS STM, 70-300 IS, 85 1.8
Canon 20D w/ Tamron 17-50
Olympus PEN E-PL2 w/ VF-2, Panny 20, 14-42 II
Flash - 550EX, 430EX II, Vivitar 283's
Other - Bogen tripod w/ ballhead, Vivitar monopod, Kenko tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RinkRat
Senior Member
Avatar
773 posts
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Near Philadelphia
     
Oct 07, 2004 13:21 |  #3

aam1234 wrote:
Anybody tried it, is it worth the upgrade (from 6.03).

I just DL'ed it last night. For the 20 minutes I used it, it seemed much faster than 6.

I'm on the fence if I want to buy that, or sharpening software.

hmmmm...


www.postorino.com (external link)
_______________
Canon 20D X 2 | 28mm f/1.8 USM| 50mm f/1.4 USM| 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM| 70-200mm f/4L USM
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aam1234
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Oct 07, 2004 13:48 |  #4

or sharpening software

What is that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RinkRat
Senior Member
Avatar
773 posts
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Near Philadelphia
     
Oct 07, 2004 13:57 |  #5

aam1234 wrote:
or sharpening software

What is that.

That is this: http://www.focusmagic.​com/download.htm (external link)

I really like using it so far, but I wonder if I actually get technically better at photography, would I really need it.

It's all so confusing! ?!


www.postorino.com (external link)
_______________
Canon 20D X 2 | 28mm f/1.8 USM| 50mm f/1.4 USM| 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM| 70-200mm f/4L USM
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aam1234
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Oct 07, 2004 14:05 |  #6

oh, focus magic.

but I wonder if I actually get technically better at photography

That's a very interesting question. Personally I would avoid such s/w unless I really really need that photo.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RinkRat
Senior Member
Avatar
773 posts
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Near Philadelphia
     
Oct 07, 2004 14:11 |  #7

aam1234 wrote:
oh, focus magic.

but I wonder if I actually get technically better at photography

That's a very interesting question. Personally I would avoid such s/w unless I really really need that photo.


But it has turned a few shots that I was going to delete, into a keeper or two.

It blows away any sharpening I can do in PSCS.


www.postorino.com (external link)
_______________
Canon 20D X 2 | 28mm f/1.8 USM| 50mm f/1.4 USM| 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM| 70-200mm f/4L USM
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aam1234
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Oct 07, 2004 14:15 |  #8

Really! then I should get that s/w... had a few half decent photos that could use that program.

Thanks for the tip.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thomascanty
Bold. Pink.
Gone, but not forgotten.
Avatar
38,071 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Temporarily Retired
     
Oct 09, 2004 23:55 |  #9

aam1234 wrote:
Anybody tried it, is it worth the upgrade (from 6.03).

I haven't even looked at it yet, but I probably won't upgrade. I'm still running version 4. I thought 5 and 6 were bloated pieces of crap. I don't expect 7 to be any different.


My name is Lonnie, but I answer to Thomas too.
LDPhotography.net (external link) | Weekly Pioneer (external link) | Facebook (external link)
"Young at heart. Slightly older in other parts."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
samdring
Senior Member
Avatar
392 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Crooked Spire, Derbyshire
     
Oct 11, 2004 12:59 |  #10

thomascanty wrote:
aam1234 wrote:
Anybody tried it, is it worth the upgrade (from 6.03).

I haven't even looked at it yet, but I probably won't upgrade. I'm still running version 4. I thought 5 and 6 were bloated pieces of crap. I don't expect 7 to be any different.

A week with 7 says it is different - sorry!
Much faster, Full Colour Management, Tools better available (edit without edit mode), doesn't crash on me and Canon RAW support.


Have a Care
Sam

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10119
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Oct 11, 2004 13:25 |  #11

Thom,

I am with you re: V4 Vs. 5 or 6.... I still run 4 as well...

But I am hoping 7 is better... and it seems they have fixed a lot. I guess I'll try the trial version of 7.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aam1234
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Oct 11, 2004 22:06 |  #12

Yes, V 6.0 is bad. But heard a lot of good things about V 7.0. I'll probably upgrade.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark0159
I say stupid things all the time
Avatar
12,935 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 286
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
     
Oct 12, 2004 00:20 |  #13

I have used the trial verson of 7.0 and found it to be slower than verson 6.
I did remove the old verson 1st before the install.
I don't know if it is because I had verson 6 installed before hand or what.

I know at the moment I wont be upgrading.


Mark
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/52782633@N04 (external link)
Canon EOS 6D | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM | Tamron SP 35mm F1.8 Di VC USD | Canon Speedlite 550EX -|- Film | Canon EOS 3 | Olympus OM2 | Zuiko 35mm f2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thomascanty
Bold. Pink.
Gone, but not forgotten.
Avatar
38,071 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Temporarily Retired
     
Oct 12, 2004 01:38 |  #14

samdring wrote:
A week with 7 says it is different - sorry!

No need to be sorry. I'm glad to hear it! :) I'll grab the demo of the new version and give it a look.


My name is Lonnie, but I answer to Thomas too.
LDPhotography.net (external link) | Weekly Pioneer (external link) | Facebook (external link)
"Young at heart. Slightly older in other parts."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,280 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
ACDsee 7
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
2035 guests, 99 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.