Ok I have currently a 400d with battery grip,I have seen a 20D relatively cheap,was thinkin of purchasing for it to be a backup to 400d.
Question is is it worth having? Am I gaining anything with the 20D that I would notice?
Thanks
barrelwell Member 42 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Scotland More info | Feb 03, 2008 15:36 | #1 Ok I have currently a 400d with battery grip,I have seen a 20D relatively cheap,was thinkin of purchasing for it to be a backup to 400d.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
austincabot Goldmember 1,090 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Atlanta More info | Feb 03, 2008 15:58 | #2 |
gabrioladude Senior Member 422 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Toronto More info | dammed if you do, dammed if you don't... Frank (aka Gabrioladude)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SolidxSnake Goldmember 1,656 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2007 More info | Feb 03, 2008 16:39 | #4 I would think the 400D + grip would become the backup. The 20D just handles so much nicer than the 350D and 400D IMO. It feels so much better in my hands. Plus, since I shoot all manual, the secondary dial on the back is huge to me (as opposed to the 350D and 400D's Av button). Troubleshooting 101 (see also: LightRules,perryge):
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vinnya Member 106 posts Joined Jan 2008 More info | Feb 03, 2008 16:43 | #5 Just to voice what everyone has already said, I would use the 400d as a backup to the 20d. Having used both I really prefer the 20d to the 400d Canon 20D| Sigma 28-70 f2.8-4|Sunpak 555|Quantum 2 Battery Pack
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bauerman discount on value meals 3,457 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2003 Location: Idaho! More info | Feb 03, 2008 19:51 | #6 Yep - you don't backup a Rebel with a higher quality product. I don't have a 300ZX in the garage in case my Taurus breaks down. In all seriousness, the 20D is just a much better shooting experience in most cases - higher megapixel count is almost a non-issue for most shooting and printing needs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gooble Goldmember 3,149 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Mesa,AZ More info | Feb 04, 2008 01:14 | #7 austincabot wrote in post #4844013 I'd use the 400d as a backup to the 20d. I'd do the same thing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Analog6 Senior Member 565 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Terranora, northern NSW, Australia More info | Feb 04, 2008 03:54 | #8 I've just got my 20D (last week) and the step up is awesome. My 300d is now definitely the backup camera. It is streets ahead. Odille
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mbellot "My dog ate my title" 3,365 posts Likes: 20 Joined Jul 2005 Location: The Miami of Canada - Chicago! More info | Feb 04, 2008 08:28 | #9 barrelwell wrote in post #4843881 Question is is it worth having? Am I gaining anything with the 20D that I would notice? Depends on what you're shooting, but in most respects the 20D is a better camera than the 400D despite being older and having fewer megapixels.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1742 guests, 176 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||