Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 04 Feb 2008 (Monday) 07:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

The Definition Of High Res???

 
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
Avatar
3,877 posts
Gallery: 821 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5006
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Perthshire in Scotland
     
Feb 04, 2008 07:02 |  #1

I've been asked to submit some "hi res" (sic) images to a magazine, but what exactly is hi res??? The ed was a bit sketchy and I have yet to have a reply from the art dept guy. They gave no indication of minimum pixel size (1024x780???) or mb (under 1 or more than 4???) or dpi (more than 72???) What would be acceptable? Any help would be appreciated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Feb 04, 2008 08:40 |  #2

It's a moving target.
2MP was high res in 2001
4MP was High res in 2003 etc..
So no idea what they could mean.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,970 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13439
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Feb 04, 2008 09:00 |  #3

bildeb0rg wrote in post #4847526 (external link)
I've been asked to submit some "hi res" (sic) images to a magazine, but what exactly is hi res??? The ed was a bit sketchy and I have yet to have a reply from the art dept guy. They gave no indication of minimum pixel size (1024x780???) or mb (under 1 or more than 4???) or dpi (more than 72???) What would be acceptable? Any help would be appreciated.

I have to submit work to newspapers and magazines all the time and what they mean is you need to submit an image that 300 DPI and the size they are going to run. So that means if the image in the magazine is 4X6 you need to send them a file that 4X6 at 300 DPI.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Feb 04, 2008 09:02 |  #4

The definition of cheap? Get back to me on that and I'll get back to you on your question. ;)


In other words, it's relative and you need to wait on a reply from them, instead of asking us.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,970 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13439
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Feb 04, 2008 09:20 as a reply to  @ cdifoto's post |  #5

Read this check the bottom of the page. Most magazines print 150 line screen(300 DPI). Also they will probably need a CMYK file.

http://dx.sheridan.com​/advisor/line_screen.h​tml (external link)

Anybody sending anything to magazines or newspapers should read this. Just click on the link.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,877 posts
Gallery: 821 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5006
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Perthshire in Scotland
     
Feb 04, 2008 12:02 |  #6

cdifoto wrote in post #4847953 (external link)
The definition of cheap? Get back to me on that and I'll get back to you on your question. ;)

Cheap? Easy peasy. That's something that turns out to be a LOT less than you thought it would be, and although you don't need two, and you know you'll prolly throw the second one away, you get them anway. Just in case.

Word is, the bigger the file size the bigger they will use it. Art guy said give them the a jpeg as big as I can send (10meg) at 300 dpi and they'll shrink to fit.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aaagogo
Goldmember
Avatar
2,403 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
     
Feb 04, 2008 12:05 |  #7

line resolution for newspaper print... usually, 200ppi image size is more than suffice... i might be wrong... i think newspapers only do like 100 line screen or close that that plus minus 20...

i would say the best bet is to ask the magazine what is the largest size print they are thinking of running your image, ask for that dimension in inches. and then multiply 300 to both side and that's how large of a image size (in terms of pixels) you need to provide them with.

say if they want to run a page, full size print.. so that's about 8.5 x 11, so you need to give them somewhat close to 2500x3300 pixel image...

given you don't have to have 300ppi, 280ppi or 250ppi is still acceptable. i think.


https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=4655753&pos​tcount=953 Your 1st 10,000 images are your worst
One photo out of focus is a mistake, ten photo out of focus are an experimentation, one hundred photo out of focus are a style

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,970 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13439
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Feb 04, 2008 12:16 as a reply to  @ Aaagogo's post |  #8

I can only tell you what my experience is and I deal with this everyday and what they said for you to send is what I usually get told to. Both me and my wife(graphic designer) are always sending things to the Chicago Trib, Sun Times and a hoist of other smaller suburban papers even Newsweek, Chicago Magazine and I always send 300 DPI to size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackshadow
Mr T. from the A team
Avatar
5,732 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, VIC Australia
     
Feb 04, 2008 13:28 |  #9

Ask the editor to specify the image size, resolution and format. It varies for different publications.


Black Shadow Photography (external link)
Facebook (external link) Flickr (external link) Twitter (external link)
Gear List Myspace (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,245 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
The Definition Of High Res???
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1477 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.