Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 05 Feb 2008 (Tuesday) 11:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Monolights or Power pack with heads?

 
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 05, 2008 11:33 |  #1

Pros and Cons of Monolights vs. Pack+heads

Pros Monolight
Each light adds power, not merely divides power
Convenient setup if lights need to be physically separated long distances
Some, not most, offer convenient adjustment of power settings without climbing to each head


Pros Pack+Heads
Lightest weight aloft, minimizes need for weight bags on stand feet
Lightest weight aloft minimizes counterweight on hairlight booms
Central adjustment of power at each head, no climbing
Central control of all modeling lights on/off


Cons Monolight
More weight aloft for every light, makes stands top heavy
More weight aloft for hair light, increases counterweight mass
Must climb to each light to adjust power
Must climb to each light to turn on/off modeling lights

Cons Pack+Heads
Each head divides available power
Add heavy power pack to add light output power
Individual control of modeling light on/ff individually at each head requires climbing
Distance between heads due to power cables, unless you add power packs


[keyword: pack v mono]


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Feb 05, 2008 12:01 |  #2

How about cost wise? Are the monolights more expensive or less for the same amount of light power?


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 05, 2008 12:31 |  #3

It is very hard to answer the relative cost question on the basis of generalities. For example, because you pay for a power supply with every monolight, it would seem that monolights are more expensive to buy per light. But AB comes in less expensive per light than other brands pack+heads.

Now if we have three AB800 at 320 w-s each, and compare to a 1000 w-s pack with 3 heads...$840 vs $1650. But we are comparing apples and oranges, since AB is clearly priced well under the pro equipment market and aims at enthusiasts!

If we compare three Dynalight Uni250jr monolights to a Dynalite economy version 1000 ws pack with 3 heads , $1650 vs. $1650, so we see you are paying same dollars for less power with the monolights (750 w/s vs. 1000 w/s)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jarrad
Senior Member
Avatar
801 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: B.C., Canada
     
Feb 05, 2008 13:53 |  #4

You have a 320ws limit on a 320ws monoblock. A 1000ws pack and head system will allow for 1000ws to one head if you wish Or 800ws to one and 100ws each to two others, etc, etc.

Distance between heads due to power cables, unless you add power packs

I'd change it to "... unless you add head extension cables or power packs."


.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 05, 2008 13:57 |  #5

Jarrad wrote in post #4857377 (external link)
You have a 320ws limit on a 320ws monoblock. A 1000ws pack and head system will allow for 1000ws to one head if you wish Or 800ws to one and 100ws each to two others, etc, etc.


I'd change it to "... unless you add head extension cables or power packs."

There is a limit to even the length of extension cables due to voltage drop thru long lengths of cables.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 05, 2008 14:00 |  #6

Jarrad wrote in post #4857377 (external link)
. A 1000ws pack and head system will allow for 1000ws to one head if you wish Or 800ws to one and 100ws each to two others, etc, etc.

Some, but not all, power packs allow for 'assymmetrical' power distribution thru multiple heads connected to the power pack. Some heads permit, if three heads were plugged in, only for all three heads to divide 1000w-s/3 equally. Other packs, with assymmetrical power distribution, could permit things to be divided unequally, although the 800-100-100 might not be achieveable, 500-125-125 might be for a two-channel power pack.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SoaringUSAEagle
Daddy Of The Crop
Avatar
10,814 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cheyenne, WY
     
Feb 05, 2008 14:03 |  #7

I know with my profotos I can use the 16' extension cord with no noticeable loss of power.

I love having my power pack. I can see both sides, in different situations. For me, the power pack was the way to go. I dont find switching individual modeling lights on or off a pain at all. Usually you'll know before hand which ones to turn off or not.

A centralized unit is great to adjust power, much quicker.

The division of power really matters that much? I find it nicer. I have NEVER needed to turn my 1200 pack to full power, ever... I guess there agian it depends on what you do. With my pack I am limited to 3 lights, where I know I will want 4 eventually. I't's just an excuse to get another pack lol.

The decision is yours I guess... whatever you prefer.


5D4 | 50 1.4 | 85L II | 24-70L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jarrad
Senior Member
Avatar
801 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: B.C., Canada
     
Feb 05, 2008 14:25 |  #8

Wilt wrote in post #4857402 (external link)
There is a limit to even the length of extension cables due to voltage drop thru long lengths of cables.

Yes, there is a limit, but you need quite a bit of extension to reach it and it means not absolutely needing to add an extra pack for more distance between heads.

Wilt wrote in post #4857419 (external link)
Some, but not all, power packs allow for 'assymmetrical' power distribution thru multiple heads connected to the power pack. Some heads permit, if three heads were plugged in, only for all three heads to divide 1000w-s/3 equally. Other packs, with assymmetrical power distribution, could permit things to be divided unequally, although the 800-100-100 might not be achieveable, 500-125-125 might be for a two-channel power pack.

Yup, Some. Not none though and probably most newer packs. It's an advantage worth noting, IMO.

:)


.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
magicmikey
Goldmember
Avatar
1,027 posts
Likes: 37
Joined Feb 2005
     
Feb 05, 2008 15:07 |  #9

Jeff Allred wrote in post #4857435 (external link)
A centralized unit is great to adjust power, much quicker.

Paul C. Buff sells a wired and a wireless remote control that will adjust the power of all the lights from one centralized remote. I use the wired remote for that reason. I don't really want to have to use a step ladder to change the power on the White Lightning I use for a hair light.

Michael




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Sep 29, 2009 12:29 |  #10

If you need max power thru one head, packs + head is the way to go...imagine 4000 w/s thru a single head, and the beast of a monolight that would have to be up on a very sturdy stand to accomplish that!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jannie
Goldmember
4,936 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Oct 03, 2009 13:17 |  #11

I haven't done all the figures but I sure would like to have some power packs + heads, often I've had a softbox and mono light at the top of a stand and it's kind of scary and it's not a wimpy stand, also I would love to have the option of 1200w or 2400w when bouncing off of large surfaces. I looked at getting a Elinchrom 600w or 1200w monolight and the price is huge plus the lights get even bigger an those things stopped me in my tracks.

I've watched other photographers work with the Profoto packs and heads and if the money is possible, go for it, it's a really sensible system, I've looked into the Elinchrom packs and heads too, I'm using Elinchrom monolights right now and love them but I'd love to switch over to the other method.

There is a place I really would love to do some portraits with a broad expanse of background indoors but I really want to mess with one light raking from about 3/4 side/back over a large area and feel I would probably need some pretty heavy duty power to do it. This is where having the more powerful packs+heads would be lovely.


Ms.Jannie
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it"!
1DMKIII, 85LII, 24-70L, 100-400L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermes
Goldmember
2,375 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Oct 03, 2009 13:32 |  #12

Jannie wrote in post #8753507 (external link)
I haven't done all the figures but I sure would like to have some power packs + heads, often I've had a softbox and mono light at the top of a stand and it's kind of scary and it's not a wimpy stand, also I would love to have the option of 1200w or 2400w when bouncing off of large surfaces. I looked at getting a Elinchrom 600w or 1200w monolight and the price is huge plus the lights get even bigger an those things stopped me in my tracks.

I've watched other photographers work with the Profoto packs and heads and if the money is possible, go for it, it's a really sensible system, I've looked into the Elinchrom packs and heads too, I'm using Elinchrom monolights right now and love them but I'd love to switch over to the other method.

There is a place I really would love to do some portraits with a broad expanse of background indoors but I really want to mess with one light raking from about 3/4 side/back over a large area and feel I would probably need some pretty heavy duty power to do it. This is where having the more powerful packs+heads would be lovely.

If raw power for one light is what you need, consider an older, analog pack.

There is a practically new Elinchrom 6000 Classic (yes... that's 6000 Watt-seconds) going for $1500 at BH at the moment - considering the 1200RX monolight is priced just under that, that's incredible value. You'll find others such as the 3000 classic around too.

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …Classic_Power_S​upply.html (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave ­ sparks
Senior Member
287 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2008
Location: NW Indiana
     
Oct 03, 2009 13:55 as a reply to  @ Hermes's post |  #13

One thing to consider. If you have a pack, and it fouls up, you're done for the day. If you have mono lights, if one goes bad, you can still shoot with the others. (If you have more than one). Unlikely but stuff does happen. Just another angle.

Dave......


40D, 24-105L, 380EX Speedlight.
Olympus E3, 14-54, 50-200, EC14 and Metz 48 AF-1.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Oct 03, 2009 15:19 |  #14

Hermes wrote in post #8753576 (external link)
If raw power for one light is what you need, consider an older, analog pack.

There is a practically new Elinchrom 6000 Classic (yes... that's 6000 Watt-seconds) going for $1500 at BH at the moment - considering the 1200RX monolight is priced just under that, that's incredible value. You'll find others such as the 3000 classic around too.

But that's just a pack, you still need a head to use with it.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermes
Goldmember
2,375 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Oct 03, 2009 16:21 |  #15

Wilt wrote in post #8754079 (external link)
But that's just a pack, you still need a head to use with it.

Yep, an expensive one too. Costs as much as the pack itself. Relatively speaking though, the whole thing is good value. I don't know of any manufacturers who even make anything as powerful as this today and i'd be willing to bet no-one makes one for anywhere near this price.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

22,792 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
Monolights or Power pack with heads?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1485 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.