Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 08 Feb 2008 (Friday) 18:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 17-40L back focusses at 17mm?

 
-MasterChief-
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Feb 08, 2008 18:14 |  #1

i just noticed this but my 17-40L back focusses when zoomed out to 17mm. focus gradually gets better as you zoom in. its perfect from approx. 25mm-40mm.

if i zoom to 17mm, acquire focus and take the shot, its consistenly back focussed compared to when i zoom to 40mm, acquire focus, then zoom back out to 17mm and take the shot.

any ideas? or is this by design?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Feb 08, 2008 18:18 |  #2

Not all zoom are parafocal. Meaning that refocus might be requirred when changing mm.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
THREAD ­ STARTER
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Feb 08, 2008 18:20 |  #3

so youre saying this is by design?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
THREAD ­ STARTER
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Feb 08, 2008 18:23 |  #4

ok i just googled what parafocal meant and no, this is not my problem. if i acquire focus at 17mm, its back focussed. if i acquire at 40mm, the focus is perfect. why is that? or is this by design?

thanks for the quick reply btw.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Calzinger
Goldmember
Avatar
1,798 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: New York
     
Feb 08, 2008 18:33 |  #5

I see what you mean, and I actually intended to make a thread addressing this. It's a habit I've developed whenever I use a zoom. I always zoom in all the way, acquire focus on the subject, and then zoom out as necessary to compose. I never compose before focusing just because it seems like there's more room for error for the autofocus at the shorter ends of zooms.

Now I don't know if your 17-40L is back focusing at the short end or not, but it seems like focusing at the shorter end of zooms isn't as accurate. Then again, I suppose that just makes sense.


"That building in the background is distracting."
"Oh OK, I'll move it out of the way next time."
internet forum fail

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
THREAD ­ STARTER
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Feb 08, 2008 18:43 |  #6

thanks chris. yeah its weird. ive tested this phenomena on my 30D and 5D and both exhibit the same behavior with the 17-40. im wondering if this is by design.

never noticed this issue on my other zooms.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,982 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Feb 08, 2008 18:55 |  #7

roeddel wrote in post #4879709 (external link)
thanks chris. yeah its weird. ive tested this phenomena on my 30D and 5D and both exhibit the same behavior with the 17-40. im wondering if this is by design.

never noticed this issue on my other zooms.

I don't have this issue with my 17-40, neither on the 350D or 400Ds I owned, and neither on my current 40D.

However, I focus differently with this lens, especially for landscapes, than I do with any longer lens.

I focus 1/3 the way into the object I want in perfect DoF. That does the trick every time. Oh, and it does focus correctly with a test chart.

I use the same technique with my EF-S 10-22.

HTH, kind regards, Wim


EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
THREAD ­ STARTER
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Feb 08, 2008 19:02 |  #8

thanks Wim. you said that it focusses correctly on a test chart. does your 17-40 focus properly at 17mm? or do you have to acquire focus at a different focal length then shoot at 17mm? thanks for the reply!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Calzinger
Goldmember
Avatar
1,798 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: New York
     
Feb 08, 2008 19:18 |  #9

roeddel wrote in post #4879709 (external link)
thanks chris. yeah its weird. ive tested this phenomena on my 30D and 5D and both exhibit the same behavior with the 17-40. im wondering if this is by design.

never noticed this issue on my other zooms.

If you only notice it on your 17-40L, then your lens may have its own flaw, though I'd rather not jump to that conclusion so quickly. I would assume that your lens is parfocal, which would explain why you can zoom in to 40mm, focus, and not have any issues zoomed back out to 17mm. I don't think varifocal SLR lenses would function the same way.

Can you do two tests on a chart? Maybe one where you focused at 17mm and the other where you focused at 40mm and zoomed back out to 17mm.


"That building in the background is distracting."
"Oh OK, I'll move it out of the way next time."
internet forum fail

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
THREAD ­ STARTER
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Feb 08, 2008 19:40 |  #10

i havent dont focus chart tests but real life tests prove that when i focus at 17mm - it backfocusses and when i focus at 40mm and zoom out to 17, focus is perfect.

i wonder if anybody else with the 17-40 have this problem.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
Avatar
3,877 posts
Gallery: 821 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5006
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Perthshire in Scotland
     
Feb 09, 2008 06:05 |  #11

"noobies argue about bodies, pros argue about glass, seasoned veterans let the pictures argue for themselves." Can you show us a pic of what you're getting? How close are you to the subject?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
THREAD ­ STARTER
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Feb 09, 2008 08:08 |  #12

the proof is in the pudding mah friends: this was shot at about 10" from the front battery for which focus @ 17mm was acquired.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


here's a center crop:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


here's one where focus was acquired at 40mm, then zoomed out to 17mm:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


also a center crop:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


i also did the same test at about 36" and came out with the same results. im not hallucinating am i? :(

thanks for the replies btw, if you have a 17-40 and have a few minutes to spare, would you please do the same test to verify or debunk this problem? thanks again! :)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mcmadkat
Goldmember
Avatar
1,059 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Scotland
     
Feb 09, 2008 08:17 |  #13

OK I will test that with my 30D + 17-40L.

Cheers,

Sam



30D 17-40L 580EXII
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=386249

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
THREAD ­ STARTER
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Feb 09, 2008 08:32 |  #14

thanks sam!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mcmadkat
Goldmember
Avatar
1,059 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Scotland
     
Feb 09, 2008 08:37 |  #15

Right, well I am not convinced your test methods are totally suitable, but I had a go anyway!

My lens seems fine. I set it up rested on the table, MLU, remote release. I dofocussed the lense manually then let it AF.

I did notice that if I moved from the 2nd battery to the 1st battery the AF did not refocus?


Here's the pictures, no sharpening other than in camera.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


Don't know how useful that it, I do enjoy an investigation though!


30D 17-40L 580EXII
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=386249

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,138 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Canon 17-40L back focusses at 17mm?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1172 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.