These pcitures took a lot of time for me to capture and it was a long wait. I would appreciate your comments. Critics welcome as you make me better
.
enjoy Senior Member 450 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: San Jose, CA More info | Feb 08, 2008 20:19 | #1 These pcitures took a lot of time for me to capture and it was a long wait. I would appreciate your comments. Critics welcome as you make me better
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 08, 2008 20:21 | #2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonloader Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 08, 2008 20:33 | #3 Nice shots, but I was hoping to see a egret eating a house sparrow. Mitch- ____...^.^...____
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samwalker Goldmember 1,932 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2006 Location: cleveland ohio usa More info | Feb 08, 2008 20:33 | #4 thanx enjoy Snoy egret is always a great prize in N Ohio. Nicely captured with a nice exposure on the white. We'll rape the horses and ride off on the women
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rubberhead Goldmember 1,899 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2006 Location: South Carolina's Lowcountry More info | Feb 08, 2008 21:35 | #5 canonloader wrote in post #4880262 Nice shots, but I was hoping to see a egret eating a house sparrow. ![]() It's funny that you said that because I thought the same thing as I opened this thread. EQUIPMENT: 40D | Rebel XT | EF 70-200mm f/4L IS | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 28-135mm IS | EF-S 18-55mm IS | EF 50mm 1.8 - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrZoom Senior Member 287 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Orange County California More info | Feb 08, 2008 21:46 | #6 canonloader wrote in post #4880262 Nice shots, but I was hoping to see a egret eating a house sparrow. ![]() I was hoping to see a house sparrow eating an egret. Now THAT would be something Ken - Canon Gear and precious L glass lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Normcar21 Goldmember 1,143 posts Joined Nov 2004 Location: Canada More info | Feb 08, 2008 21:53 | #7 I agree with the zoomer, the sparrow appears a bit on the dark side, but that first shot is exposed fabulously. I don't see one "blown" area in the entire egret, and that doesn't happen often from my experience with viewing this bird. That last action shot is simply great because it's a brief second captured perfectly. I'm sure the bird "missed," otherwise the next photo would have been the display of the catch shot Mark II and III; 17-40L; 24-70L; 50/1.8; 85/1.2L; 70-200/2.8L IS; 200/1.8L; 100-400L IS; Sigma 50-500; 1.4x, 2x extenders.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 09, 2008 00:06 | #8 Thanks for your comments guys. Yeah I missed the catching shot by milliseconds but what I liked in this case is that you can still see the eyes opened for the Egret.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 520 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||