JimAskew wrote in post #4886371
Hi,
I have a question for you 5D owners. I am buying a 5D in March (as soon as my 2007 bonus hits the bank)
My question is this: given my current lens line up should I get the 24-105MM f/4 EF IS as well? I am getting the 17-40MM f/4 EF L as the UWA for the 5D (AMEX Rewards points...free to me) and I have a 24-70MM EF L for the 5D main lens.
It just seems to me that 24-105MM is redundant to what I already have. On the "up" side if you get it bundled with the 5D it saves about $500 over the stand alond price. I have read that the 24-105MM f/4 makes a fine street lens.
I shoot grandkids, group events, pro bono weddings, and landscapes.
So, fellow 5D POTNers...what say you?
Jim,
I was in your boat a few months ago when I was deciding on my 5D... I ended up getting the 24-105 lens with it... I always knew I could turn around and sell it if the need be... Despite the similar focal lengths, I feel they are distinctly different lenses for different purposes... After using both of them, my 24-105 is my casual walk around lens... When I go into low-light, my 105 gets booted and the 24-70 takes over (unless I need reach or can use my 85L)... Also, if you're like me you probably don't wanna switch lenses too much if you thought about fully going the "prime route" in lieu of the 24-70... If money really is a crunch, IMHO, I would keep the 24-70 and pass on the 105 in a heartbeat... Its sharper than my 105 and has noticeably superior color/contrast... Though thats not to say the 105 is no slouch either!! If you can though, get both!!!