Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 11 Feb 2008 (Monday) 18:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Post Processing: Critique me

 
TheLetterQ
Member
Avatar
195 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Feb 11, 2008 18:58 |  #1

Trying out this whole "post processing" thing because taking good pictures isn't enough in today's world. Please let me know what you think, or if you have any good advice.

IMAGE: http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/jj204/Pleasetakeitkindly/steve160.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Feb 11, 2008 19:07 |  #2

OK, honest critique here...

It isn't a flattering natural light photo. The shadows are too dark under the eyes and with the high contrast treatment, it isn't what one would normally consider an attractive result. Also the highlights are blown (pure white on the jacket collar and sleeve?).

With the noise, it looks like what you used to get if you shot Tmax 400 and pushed it a few stops or the plain result from the old 3200. I like that kind of look actually but it doesn't work well for a portrait of a pretty girl.


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Feb 11, 2008 20:09 as a reply to  @ TheHoff's post |  #3

The better the shot, the less PP is needed.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOSBoy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,083 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Panama City, FL
     
Feb 11, 2008 20:13 |  #4

chauncey wrote in post #4899748 (external link)
The better the shot, the less PP is needed.

I second that. Depending on which direction you're going pp is usually necessary when complimenting the image's quality. Otherwise you can go full blown on pp to make the images more of an art rather than a photo.


http://patrickengman.c​om (external link)
Instagram: brotherly_dove
Rolleiflex 3.5F Planar

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kmorgan
Senior Member
Avatar
282 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Hauppauge, Long Island, NY
     
Feb 11, 2008 20:27 as a reply to  @ EOSBoy's post |  #5

Reduce the noise, convert to RGB and add a warming filter. Looks good here with those changes.... Allow Image editing and I'll upload it.

Kevin


Kevin Morgan
Long Island, New York
EOS
Rebel XT
Canon 18-55 EF
S, Canon 70-300 EF IS
Powershot G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheLetterQ
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
195 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Feb 12, 2008 01:14 |  #6

kmorgan wrote in post #4899861 (external link)
Reduce the noise, convert to RGB and add a warming filter. Looks good here with those changes.... Allow Image editing and I'll upload it.

Kevin

Alright, i changed it. (I didn't realize i needed to do that for people to be able to edit my stuff). I'm interested to see what you did differently.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tdodd
Goldmember
Avatar
3,733 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Essex, UK
     
Feb 12, 2008 02:21 |  #7

It's hard (for me) to judge how successful your PP was when we don't have a copy of the original unedited image for comparison. It might have been perfect as it was - or people may be able to suggest alternative PP that may have worked better.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kmorgan
Senior Member
Avatar
282 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Hauppauge, Long Island, NY
     
Feb 12, 2008 07:00 |  #8

TheLetterQ wrote in post #4901387 (external link)
Alright, i changed it. (I didn't realize i needed to do that for people to be able to edit my stuff). I'm interested to see what you did differently.

Ok, just got home from work, here it is...

Kevin


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Kevin Morgan
Long Island, New York
EOS
Rebel XT
Canon 18-55 EF
S, Canon 70-300 EF IS
Powershot G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Feb 12, 2008 12:48 as a reply to  @ kmorgan's post |  #9

OK, how about the unedited version.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheLetterQ
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
195 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Feb 12, 2008 19:12 |  #10

chauncey wrote in post #4903927 (external link)
OK, how about the unedited version.

Ok this is the picture as it was straight out of the camera.

IMAGE: http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/jj204/Pleasetakeitkindly/steve160-1.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chet
showed up to keep the place interesting
44,018 posts
Gallery: 132 photos
Likes: 2462
Joined Sep 2007
     
Feb 12, 2008 19:29 |  #11

Watch your focus. Right now your focus is on the tip of her nose. Focus for the eyes! Otherwise I like the original best.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kmorgan
Senior Member
Avatar
282 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Hauppauge, Long Island, NY
     
Feb 12, 2008 19:55 as a reply to  @ Chet's post |  #12

The original is much better than the b/w. Very pretty girl. I took the liberty of some quick retouching (mostly around the eyes) and added some more saturation.

Kevin


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Kevin Morgan
Long Island, New York
EOS
Rebel XT
Canon 18-55 EF
S, Canon 70-300 EF IS
Powershot G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
setcode
Member
Avatar
84 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: OH
     
Feb 13, 2008 11:42 as a reply to  @ kmorgan's post |  #13

my try


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
midnitejam
Senior Member
806 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Parma Ohio
     
May 07, 2008 13:01 as a reply to  @ setcode's post |  #14

setcode, You ROCK!

Your colored edit is a wall hanger.

The original post has very much going for it except for as already mentioned.

The composition is A-1. The axis of the eyes being placed on the diagonal is always a plus. The pose, the model, the raport, the model's expression are A-1 portraiture. All that was needed to transform the image into a nice portrait was the PP.


Midnitejam--The happiness in your life depends on the quality of your thoughts.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Epix
Senior Member
Avatar
507 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2007
     
May 07, 2008 13:02 |  #15

kmorgan wrote in post #4899861 (external link)
Reduce the noise, convert to RGB and add a warming filter. Looks good here with those changes.... Allow Image editing and I'll upload it.

Kevin

What does this mean, allow image editing?


Rick
5D | 24-70 f2.8L | 50mm f/1.8
www.usethelight.com (external link)
"I like my images RAW"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,584 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
Post Processing: Critique me
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2602 guests, 168 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.