It seems like that UV(N) filters are much cheaper than the UV(0)'s
Anybody know why?
I cannot seem to find the difference?
eryk Goldmember 2,055 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2005 More info | Feb 15, 2008 16:51 | #1 It seems like that UV(N) filters are much cheaper than the UV(0)'s Canon EOS 5Dmk3 //
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LesterWareham Moderator More info | Feb 16, 2008 08:56 | #2 Apparently the UV(N) are "said" to be cheap non-optical glass filter for the Asian market. UV(O) are proper optical glass. If going for Hoya get the SHMC Pro1 (digital) clear protectors or UV(O). More info about filter in the protective filter FAQ linked in my sig. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
neil_r Cream of the Proverbial Crop Landscape and Cityscape Photographer 2006 18,065 posts Likes: 10 Joined Jan 2003 Location: The middle of the UK More info | Feb 16, 2008 08:58 | #3 OT I know but:- Neil - © NHR Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 16, 2008 14:03 | #4 Lester Wareham wrote in post #4929029 Apparently the UV(N) are "said" to be cheap non-optical glass filter for the Asian market. UV(O) are proper optical glass. If going for Hoya get the SHMC Pro1 (digital) clear protectors or UV(O). More info about filter in the protective filter FAQ linked in my sig. thanks. Canon EOS 5Dmk3 //
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LesterWareham Moderator More info | Feb 16, 2008 16:02 | #5 You probably need to do careful resolution testing. Something else to look for with long lenses at least is odd bokeh in areas of a shot that are just going out of focus. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry 1699 guests, 133 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||