Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 18 Feb 2008 (Monday) 21:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

$458 a good price

 
eeeksNYC
Senior Member
Avatar
602 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC/NJ
     
Feb 18, 2008 21:04 |  #1

Got a line on a 70-200 f/4 L for 450. Less than 1 year old. No scratches, fungus, etc etc.

Good price?


eeeksNYC (my blog (external link), my flickr (external link))
zeiss ikon icarex 35s,5D MK1/ EF 28-70 f2.8L / Sigma 50mm f1.4 / Sunpak 383s / Cybersyncs / and a couple bags of other stuff....http://www.flickr.com/​photos/29075737@N02/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
SlowBlink
"I like dog butts"
Avatar
1,926 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Vancouver B.C.
     
Feb 18, 2008 21:09 |  #2

I've seen a couple that price but not often so, Yup.


Rob
Anatidaephobia - The Fear That You are Being Watched by a Duck.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 286
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
     
Feb 18, 2008 21:15 |  #3

Good price indeed! Go for it if this is the lens you want.

What you gonna use it for? (Just asking because I personally find 70-200 zooms pretty useless on crop bodies).


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adblink
Goldmember
Avatar
1,458 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2007
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
     
Feb 18, 2008 21:15 |  #4

I paid $450 shipped for mine


|Canon 40D + BG-E2N | 580EXII | 430EX | Phottix Atlas Triggers
|100mm F/2.8 Macro | 70-200mm f/4L | 24-105mm F/4L IS | 1.4x MKII TC |Sigma 10-20mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
trumpet_guy
Senior Member
Avatar
343 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: San Fransicso Bay Area
     
Feb 18, 2008 21:23 |  #5

Yes, that's a good price. That's what I paid for my used copy, with filter.


Tim S. ---> Canon bodies; Canon zooms and primes; C/Y Zeiss primes and zoom; Leica macro; Rokinon primes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hsma
Senior Member
262 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Feb 18, 2008 21:25 |  #6

perryge wrote in post #4945449 (external link)
Good price indeed! Go for it if this is the lens you want.

What you gonna use it for? (Just asking because I personally find 70-200 zooms pretty useless on crop bodies).

Why do you find the focal length useless on crop bodies?


40D + Grip, XTi + Grip, 70-200 2.8 IS, 17-55 2.8 IS, 50 1.8,
580 EX II, 430 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 286
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
     
Feb 18, 2008 21:30 |  #7

hsma wrote in post #4945530 (external link)
Why do you find the focal length useless on crop bodies?

Too long on the short end, too short on the long end. The 50-150 range is much nicer, and Sigma makes a nice 50-150 f/2.8 for cropped cameras, which is faster and cheaper than the 70-200 f/4L. Better focal length for portraits, faster glass for sports and indoor stuff, and all around better value for money for cropped cameras, imho.

I just don't see when you would use it, or when it would be the ideal lens for any situation on a cropped body, especially when there are better, cheaper, faster alternatives for various situations. Sure some people have a use for it, but I see this lens pushed far too frequently just because it's the cheapest L.

But it depends on what you intend to shoot with it, but let's take a look at some common situations:

Portraits: 50 and 85 primes are better choices.
Wildlife/birds: too short, no IS, 70-300 IS a better choice for the same price.
Sports: too slow unless you're shooting outdoors in bright sunlight (added that so ed rader doesn't chime in :p).

Face it, f/4 is slow, and 200mm is short. For me, in every possible situation, there is a better lens of equal or lower price than the 70-200 f/4L for the job, with the possible exception of outdoor sports on bright days.


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DVS_WiNdz
Cream of the Crop
9,835 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: New York, NY
     
Feb 18, 2008 21:32 |  #8

Price seems right for a used 70-200mm f/4L


Stephen L.
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SwiftFootTim
Goldmember
Avatar
1,044 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
     
Feb 18, 2008 21:43 |  #9

Love my 70-200mm f2.8 IS and I'm using in on an XTi, seems just right for me.


Canon 1D MkIII, 580 EX II, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 300 f/2.8 EX DG HSM, Lowepro Flipside 400 AW

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 286
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
     
Feb 18, 2008 21:47 |  #10

SwiftFootTim wrote in post #4945689 (external link)
Love my 70-200mm f2.8 IS and I'm using in on an XTi, seems just right for me.

Yes but f/2.8 + IS is a completely different story. That suddenly makes it an amazing lens for indoor events and sports, concerts, and all kinds of lovely stuff.


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eeeksNYC
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
602 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC/NJ
     
Feb 18, 2008 21:48 |  #11

mostly for street stuff, outdoors. Really digging the urban photography stuff. For Portraits I have the Nifty 50 and the wonderful 85 f2.8.

I have recently purchased a Sigma 24-60 2.8 as my *walkaround* lens. The L will take me from 70 on.

I didnt want to get focal lengths strictly based on crop body sensors for the eventuality of upgrading to a full frame 5d or something. I think full frame sensors trickling down to the semi-pro rig is just around the corner.

I could be wrong, but I'll still have the L.


eeeksNYC (my blog (external link), my flickr (external link))
zeiss ikon icarex 35s,5D MK1/ EF 28-70 f2.8L / Sigma 50mm f1.4 / Sunpak 383s / Cybersyncs / and a couple bags of other stuff....http://www.flickr.com/​photos/29075737@N02/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rooeey
-Shorty-
Avatar
2,552 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2007
Location: Sydney Australia
     
Feb 18, 2008 21:51 |  #12

I am using a Sigma 70-200F2.8 on my 400D crop body and its just dandy..


1D MK111 , 5D Classic,24-70F2.8, 16-35F2.8, 70-200F2.8 IS a 430EXII 2x 580EXII and a Mac...:cool:
http://s229.photobucke​t.com/albums/ee124/roo​eey/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eeeksNYC
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
602 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC/NJ
     
Feb 18, 2008 22:05 |  #13

dang it...nevermind...I got beat out on an ebay auction at literally...the last second.

501.02...beat my max bid by 2cents with 2 seconds remaining.

*sigh* guess I'll just save my pennies for later.


eeeksNYC (my blog (external link), my flickr (external link))
zeiss ikon icarex 35s,5D MK1/ EF 28-70 f2.8L / Sigma 50mm f1.4 / Sunpak 383s / Cybersyncs / and a couple bags of other stuff....http://www.flickr.com/​photos/29075737@N02/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,176 views & 0 likes for this thread
$458 a good price
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is foxier22
499 guests, 382 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.