Parallels or VM Fusion? Which best to run WinXP in Mac OSX?
hassiman Member 130 posts Joined May 2007 More info | Feb 19, 2008 15:54 | #1 Parallels or VM Fusion? Which best to run WinXP in Mac OSX?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Belmondo Cream of the Crop 42,735 posts Likes: 15 Joined Jul 2003 Location: 92210 More info | Unfortunately, it's going to be hard finding a useful side-by-side comparison, but I was told by people at an Apple store that Fusion was better. I own it, use it, and have no problems with it, but without actually using Parallels, I can't say if one is any better than the other. I can recommend Fusion without reservation, though. I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pete I was "Prime Mover" many years back.... 38,631 posts Likes: 25 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Berkshire, UK More info | Feb 20, 2008 11:04 | #4 Parallels tends to get updated fairly regularly, and they listen to customers (they have a decent customer forum there).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PerryGe Batteries? We don't need no... . . . or cards. More info | Feb 20, 2008 13:55 | #5 Either really....I've tried both on the iMac at home and they both work wonderfully. Perry | www.perryge.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 22, 2008 19:51 | #6 I run WinXP in Fusion with no issues. On my MacBook, Vista is just tolerable using Fusion, but I can spend hours working from home using the XP VM. Canon EOS 70D | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM • EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | Tamron SP 60mm f/2 Macro Di II | Samyang 8mm f/3.8 VDSLR Fish-eye
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1747 guests, 170 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||