Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 19 Oct 2004 (Tuesday) 15:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon lenses: How much better is the "L" series

 
Kirik
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Oct 2004
     
Oct 19, 2004 15:10 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban
SPAM PUT AWAY
This post is marked as spam.
evilenglishman
Goldmember
1,184 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2003
     
Oct 19, 2004 15:29 |  #2

brief answer? yes.


Click here to view and/or sign the petition (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neil_r
Cream of the Proverbial Crop
Landscape and Cityscape Photographer 2006
Avatar
18,065 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jan 2003
Location: The middle of the UK
     
Oct 19, 2004 15:32 |  #3

To be more precise... Lots & Yes

N


Neil - © NHR Photography
Commercial Site (external link) - Video Site (external link) - Blog - (external link)Gear List There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~ Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kirik
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Oct 2004
     
Oct 19, 2004 15:44 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban
SPAM PUT AWAY
This post is marked as spam.
JK
Senior Member
Avatar
394 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Oct 19, 2004 22:31 |  #5

Kirik wrote:
"Lots"

Is that what the L stands for? :)

No, no... it stands for "Loan" and your bank manager will be more than happy to give you one... :D


"You don't take a photograph, you make it." - Ansel Adams
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waynejgilbert
Member
32 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Oct 19, 2004 23:39 |  #6

For me the *L* stands for Lucky to have a couple LOL! :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Schizophreak
Member
37 posts
Joined Aug 2003
     
Oct 20, 2004 01:54 |  #7

L = Luxury = $$$




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris.bailey
Goldmember
2,061 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
     
Oct 20, 2004 04:02 |  #8

Kirik wrote:
How much better is the "L" series than the non-L series - worth the $?
Thanks

Like many areas of life, the law of diminishing returns sets in where twice the price does not mean twice the quality. To me paying double for a 10% improvement is worth it, for others it may not be.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BearSummer
Senior Member
Avatar
925 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jul 2003
Location: South East UK
     
Oct 20, 2004 04:25 |  #9

Hi Kirik,

yep they are worth the money if you are trying to get as close to ultimate quality as you can. However you need to be using the camera to the best of your ability to get the best out of them. Obey the rules, 1/lens length, shoot with a tripod/monopod where possible, use mirror lockup if you can etc etc. they are still lots better than the consumer glass. If you aren't doing the right things to begin with then the improvement from L's isnt going to be as great as it could be.

Well I like them :>

Best regards

BearSummer


Moderation is for people that can't handle excess.

Gear List.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Schizophreak
Member
37 posts
Joined Aug 2003
     
Oct 20, 2004 06:02 |  #10

BearSummer wrote:
Hi Kirik,

yep they are worth the money if you are trying to get as close to ultimate quality as you can. However you need to be using the camera to the best of your ability to get the best out of them. Obey the rules, 1/lens length, shoot with a tripod/monopod where possible, use mirror lockup if you can etc etc. they are still lots better than the consumer glass. If you aren't doing the right things to begin with then the improvement from L's isnt going to be as great as it could be.

Well I like them :>

Best regards

BearSummer

Well said. If you don't know how to use the L's to its abilities, then its a big waste.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tommykjensen
Cream of the Crop
21,013 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 260
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
     
Oct 20, 2004 06:14 |  #11

BearSummer wrote:
Obey the rules, 1/lens length

How does this relate to the ISO rule 1/ISO ?

For example:

Lens at 200 mm = 1/200 shutter
ISO 100 = 1/100 shutter

which to use?

or

Lens at 200 mm = 1/200 shutter
ISO 400 = 1/400 shutter

which to use?


EDITING OF MY PHOTOS IS NOT ALLOWED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ralee
Member
36 posts
Joined Oct 2004
     
Oct 20, 2004 06:41 |  #12

Hi Kirik

I do find that L's are worth the extra money. If you are starting to look for good value L's you should look at the 17-40 f4L or the 70-200 f4L. Both of these lenses are amazing value. L lenses are usually faster aperture, faster focusing, and sharper ( most noticeable when used wide open)

Rob




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BearSummer
Senior Member
Avatar
925 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jul 2003
Location: South East UK
     
Oct 20, 2004 07:04 |  #13

Hi TommyKjensen,

The rule I was refering to was.. when hand holding a lens dont shoot with a shutter speed that is less than 1/lens length not the sunny 16 rule. The only reason to use the sunny 16 rule is if you dont have a hand held meter or your in camera meter has packed up. Sunny 16 says that if you set the shutter speed to be 1/iso then you should be shooting af f16 on a sunny day (or anything that is directly lit by sunlight eg the moon). Hopefully you wont need to use this rule as if you do then your cameras broken (as we are talking about eos's) and needs to go in for fixing. I was guessing that as we were talking about L glass you would know that i meant hand holding rather than sunny 16. You can push it with hand holding but its best not to, better to use a tripod/monopod/chainpo​d if possible.

Hope that helps

BearSummer


Moderation is for people that can't handle excess.

Gear List.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IncompletePete
Senior Member
Avatar
274 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Aug 2004
Location: UK
     
Oct 20, 2004 07:05 |  #14

What exactly does the "L" stand for? ?!


www.sportsshooter.com/​pete (external link)
www.petelorence.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tommykjensen
Cream of the Crop
21,013 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 260
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
     
Oct 20, 2004 07:10 |  #15

BearSummer wrote:
Hi TommyKjensen,

The rule I was refering to was.. when hand holding a lens dont shoot with a shutter speed that is less than 1/lens length not the sunny 16 rule.

Thanks, I had forgotten that this was the sunny 16 rule.


EDITING OF MY PHOTOS IS NOT ALLOWED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,401 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
Canon lenses: How much better is the "L" series
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1787 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.