Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 21 Oct 2004 (Thursday) 06:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

[EDIT] My 70-200mm IS lens is buggy

 
JX
Senior Member
508 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Oct 21, 2004 06:31 |  #1

I bought a brand new 70-200 F/2.8 IS USM lens the lens cost about $1,500.00. I believe the IS unit is faulty. My camera locks up every time I am in low light situations when “IS” is on. I receive an err 01. After searching through different forums, this lens has been plagued with problems. Canon may make quality lens, but they have poor quality control.


JX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Oct 21, 2004 06:40 |  #2

Sorory to hear you're having a problem. I don't think the problem is chronic, however, and it may not be a quality issue as much as a design problem. (Is there really a difference?)

I was shooting my Mk II with the 70-200 f/2.8L IS a couple days ago and had a similar problem. I finally ended up removing and reinstalling the lens and the problem went away.....for now. It's the first problem I've had with the lens in almost a year.

Or is it the Mk II?

BTW, which body are you using? I'm wondering if there's a compatability issue between the lens and the DIGIC circuitry.


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dhbailey
Senior Member
328 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: New Hampshire, USA
     
Oct 21, 2004 06:48 |  #3

I just received my 20D yesterday, along with the 75-300 IS zoom lens, and the documentation says that in low light the IS won't work and it should be turned off.

I wonder if this is the problem you're having -- not a bad IS mechanism, just that it can't really lock on the image in low light.


David
===============
Cameras: S3is and 20D
Canon 18-55 kit lens, 50mm 1.8, 75-300 USM IS
Tamron 28-75 F2.8, 420EX flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cadwell
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,333 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Oct 21, 2004 07:08 |  #4

dhbailey wrote:
I just received my 20D yesterday, along with the 75-300 IS zoom lens, and the documentation says that in low light the IS won't work and it should be turned off.

I wonder if this is the problem you're having -- not a bad IS mechanism, just that it can't really lock on the image in low light.

Ummm... so what precisely is the point of IS then? I thought one of the big selling points was that it gave you "an extra couple of stops" to allow you to shoot hand held in lower light levels ?!


Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsport (external link)/Canoe Polo (external link)/Other Stuff (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Oct 21, 2004 07:57 |  #5

I have the lens in question and have used it on my MKII and 10D without any errors. It is probably the sharpest lens in my bag and have used it in low light conditions. I've never really read the part in the manual where it says that the IS won't function in low light. I suppose that it depends on how low a lighting situation that you are working in. Are your expectations set too high for the lens. Perhaps you could explain the situation that you were shooting in a little more.

I do take exception to your shotgun approach to your subject line. It implies that Canon is lacking in quality across their general product lines. Yes I am a fan of Canon products. I own several of the L series lenses and a couple of very good bodies.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Oct 21, 2004 08:05 |  #6

JX wrote:
Canon may make quality lens, but they have poor quality control.

ssim wrote:
I do take exception to your shotgun approach to your subject line. It implies that Canon is lacking in quality across their general product lines. Yes I am a fan of Canon products. I own several of the L series lenses and a couple of very good bodies.


Yeah, JX, that probably is an overly-broad statement. The fact that you're having a problem does not mean the issue is widespread. It's unfortunate, especially for you, but is far from being justification for a 'Bash Canon' campaign.

I think the vast majority of Canon purchasers would tell you they think the quality control is just fine (if not excellent).


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JX
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
508 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Oct 21, 2004 08:15 |  #7

If I am shooting at f2.8 at 1/200 sec, and the camera metering system determines this is not a correct exposure it just won't take the picture. When "IS" is on under the same conditions the camera locks up. An “err 01†code is displayed. The Mark II will not function. The only way to clear the error is to shut the camera off and dismount the lens.


JX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlipsidE
Goldmember
Avatar
1,701 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: South Carolina USA
     
Oct 21, 2004 08:15 |  #8

Since it took me six Digital Rebels to get a good one, I almost tend to agree with the subject of this thread. But, at the same time, I'm not sure I can blame that on Canon. It might have been Best Buy's fault.

FlipsidE


FlipsidE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roanjohn
Goldmember
Avatar
3,805 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
     
Oct 21, 2004 08:22 |  #9

FlipsidE wrote:
Since it took me six Digital Rebels to get a good one, I almost tend to agree with the subject of this thread. But, at the same time, I'm not sure I can blame that on Canon. It might have been Best Buy's fault.

FlipsidE

:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

SIX!!!??!!! I would've switched to Nikon on the 3rd one!!! :twisted: :twisted:

Ro1




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Deckyon
Senior Member
Avatar
624 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Louisville, KY - USA
     
Oct 21, 2004 08:30 |  #10

I have the 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS lens and have never had a problem using it on either my 1D MkII or 20D. I shoot low light a lot, and have had no problems at all.

Take the lens back to the store and get a new one.


Brad Buskey
http://www.sturmphoto.​com (external link)

Canon EOS 1D Mark II
Canon EOS 20D
Canon EF L Lenses
Omega View 45F Monorail View Camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlipsidE
Goldmember
Avatar
1,701 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: South Carolina USA
     
Oct 21, 2004 08:32 |  #11

roanjohn wrote:
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

SIX!!!??!!! I would've switched to Nikon on the 3rd one!!! :twisted: :twisted:

Ro1

- Well, I honestly wanted to stick with Canon if I could. I bought a Powershot S30 two years ago, and it's been working flawlessly. I knew Canon had it in 'em, so I stuck it out.

When I found out the fifth one was bad, I went to a different Best Buy store. That Best Buy had a much more friendly and helpful staff, and so far, this camera seems to be good.

FlipsidE


FlipsidE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattchase
Member
112 posts
Joined Apr 2003
     
Oct 21, 2004 08:33 |  #12

JX, that sounds more like a focus problem than metering system. I have never seen a metering system that wouldn't allow you to take a picture, even if the exposure was totally wrong. But if the camera / lens can't find a point to focus on, then it won't take the picture.

When you have the problem, does the focus indicator dot in the viewfinder blink, or is it solid? Solid means it found focus, blinking means it can't, in which case it won't take the picture. If you switch the lens to manual focus, or if you switch the camera to AI Servo mode, then the camera won't care if it is in focus anymore, and will let you take the shot pretty much no matter what.

As far as the ERR 01, I don't know what error that code is for. I have read about many people having error codes that went away after removing and remounting the lens, leading to the theory that if the contacts on the lens or camera aren't clean or lined up and making good contact, that it will cause an error code. Doesn't seem to matter who makes the lens, I have seen it happen with just about every brand out there. But I think that problem usually gives an ERR 99 (but maybe different bodies give different codes for the same error).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JX
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
508 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Oct 21, 2004 08:33 |  #13

reply to ssim post

ssim wrote:

I have the lens in question and have used it on my MKII and 10D without any errors. It is probably the sharpest lens in my bag and have used it in low light conditions. I've never really read the part in the manual where it says that the IS won't function in low light. I suppose that it depends on how low a lighting situation that you are working in. Are your expectations set too high for the lens. Perhaps you could explain the situation that you were shooting in a little more.

I do take exception to your shotgun approach to your subject line. It implies that Canon is lacking in quality across their general product lines. Yes I am a fan of Canon products. I own several of the L series lenses and a couple of very good



"

I've never really read the part in the manual where it says that the IS won't function in low light. "

Da!!! That is my point.

ssim wrote

"I do take exception to your shotgun approach to your subject line. "

If you received a defective lens that you paid $1,500.00 you just might have a different opinion.

Ssim wrote:
[QUOTE]"It implies that Canon is lacking in quality across their general product lines." [/quote
]

Ask all the 20 D users who posted problems how they feel about quality across general product line.


Ssims wrote:

"Are your expectations set too high for the lens."

My expectations for an "L" lens is that it work and be free of defectives when purchased brand new.

JX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JX
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
508 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Oct 21, 2004 08:46 |  #14

mattchase

Matt,

The err 01 code is a communication problem between the lens and the camera.

But if the camera / lens can't find a point to focus on, then it won't take the picture. Matt that is a good point. I am not sure if the green light was blinking or solid. But even so the camera should not lock up. Also, as long as I leave IS turned off, I don't have a problem.


JX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Oct 21, 2004 08:48 |  #15

JX wrote:
Ask all the 20 D users who posted problems how they feel about quality across general product line.

Ooooh. Cheap shot! :lol: :lol:

I don't think we've heard much about problems with the 20D since firmware v.1.05 was released. I'm not sure that really pertains to this discussion.


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,051 views & 0 likes for this thread, 25 members have posted to it.
[EDIT] My 70-200mm IS lens is buggy
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1787 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.