Sigma is actually $1229
Non IS Canon is $1499 you say...
is the canon really $270 better? All the stuff I have been reading seem to think that there isn't much between the sigma and the canon NON IS.
$270 gets me on my way to a 10-22 which would complete the range I would like to use currently
The Sigma has a few things going for it.. the IQ seems to be mostly a wash, it's cheaper and it's black (I prefer subtle lenses but that's a personal preference thing so that point could swing either way)...
$270 is a notable amount towards a new lens... if I were to be going non-IS I'd probably fork out for the Sigma.




