Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Transportation 
Thread started 27 Feb 2008 (Wednesday) 09:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Subaru love

 
chixwithtrix
Member
Avatar
51 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Austin
     
Feb 27, 2008 09:24 |  #1

This is my first time shooting stationary cars and I would definitely like some comments about the photos and the style of them. I've never really worked with a photo much in Photoshop, but I tried some new things to get a sterile look with these and would like to hear your thoughts!

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

RCTV Productions (external link)
Photo: 30D + kit lens, Canon 100-400mm. Video: Canon XL2
Me (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Feb 27, 2008 10:14 |  #2

I like the 3rd one best. My trix: A few Car Lighting Tips - Updated

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v218/PhotosGuy/Forum%20Junk/Welcome-ChargerRT_020.gif

FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kyleturbo
Senior Member
436 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
Location: senoia, ga
     
Feb 27, 2008 13:04 |  #3

I like in the first picture how the lights sort of have a wave going. Almost like a wind tunnel.


www.burdg.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tsw910
Goldmember
Avatar
2,650 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Nyc
     
Feb 27, 2008 13:31 |  #4

the 2nd one does it for me ... it looks like it belongs in a subaru catalog


Scuba Tom
http://tomwangphotogra​phy.com (external link)NYC Wedding Photographer (external link)http://www.tomwangphot​ography.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TomTomTuning
Goldmember
Avatar
1,983 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Camp Hill, Pa
     
Feb 27, 2008 13:35 |  #5

1,2,3 are just fantastic

Did you only use the available light?


5D Mark III, 40D, 17-40L, 24-70L, 50L, 70-200 F2.8L IS
Gear List & Feedback Links
Flickr (external link) l 500px (external link) l Google+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
disboifan
Senior Member
Avatar
483 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: houston
     
Feb 27, 2008 13:48 |  #6

lighting looks really good and even to me. i think i shot with you at mean streets until they kicked us out.


flickr (external link)
www.danhphan.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chixwithtrix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
51 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Austin
     
Feb 27, 2008 14:39 as a reply to  @ disboifan's post |  #7

awesome, thanks for the comments!

Tom - yes, that was available light for a 2-4 second exposure; no flash or anything...came out better than I thought it would.

disboifan - Which Mean Streets event were you at?


RCTV Productions (external link)
Photo: 30D + kit lens, Canon 100-400mm. Video: Canon XL2
Me (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ajbalazic
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,228 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Kitchener, ON, Canada
     
Feb 27, 2008 21:37 |  #8

Another vote for #2. Very good. I like the first one too.


Alan
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kaitanium
Goldmember
Avatar
3,967 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco USA
     
Feb 28, 2008 01:07 |  #9

dang man 2 is sweet. very keen eye in searching for the light which happens to make for a nicely composed pic!! kinda trippy to because the car is lighted by another light yet you think its the light above.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustinL
Goldmember
1,537 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 3
Joined May 2005
Location: CT
     
Feb 28, 2008 10:40 |  #10

Would you mind telling us why you didn't roll the car foward more into the light in #1? Seems like definition is lost in the wheel wells (no tires) and towards the roof of the car.

Excellent captures overall. Impressive!


My Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chixwithtrix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
51 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Austin
     
Feb 28, 2008 12:08 |  #11

JustinL wrote in post #5013082 (external link)
Would you mind telling us why you didn't roll the car foward more into the light in #1? Seems like definition is lost in the wheel wells (no tires) and towards the roof of the car.

Excellent captures overall. Impressive!

Good catch, thanks! Honestly I think that was because of my tunnel vision sticking with the interesting graphic of the light dipping back behind the car. I doubt that the wheel wells would gain much definition with the way the lights were positioned, but the mid section of the car would definitely benefit from it.

I think both ways would work, in the 1st photo having the darker area on the center pops the more important (or at least more graphical/definable) front and rear of the it and pulls your eye along the car. With the car in full light would give a better overall picture and get some interesting light play on the entire car that would be fun to work with.

Thanks for all of the comments everyone, keep 'em coming!


RCTV Productions (external link)
Photo: 30D + kit lens, Canon 100-400mm. Video: Canon XL2
Me (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustinL
Goldmember
1,537 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 3
Joined May 2005
Location: CT
     
Feb 28, 2008 12:30 |  #12

IF it really bothered you, you can always try to use a reflector to gain the definition back on the tires. The rear shows up somewhat from the tire shine that was used.

Is that your wagon?


My Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kaitanium
Goldmember
Avatar
3,967 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco USA
     
Feb 28, 2008 13:20 |  #13

chixwithtrix wrote in post #5013655 (external link)
Good catch, thanks! Honestly I think that was because of my tunnel vision sticking with the interesting graphic of the light dipping back behind the car. I doubt that the wheel wells would gain much definition with the way the lights were positioned, but the mid section of the car would definitely benefit from it.

I think both ways would work, in the 1st photo having the darker area on the center pops the more important (or at least more graphical/definable) front and rear of the it and pulls your eye along the car. With the car in full light would give a better overall picture and get some interesting light play on the entire car that would be fun to work with.

Thanks for all of the comments everyone, keep 'em coming!


agreed. no need to care about those wheel well definitions, its not like your minds eye cant automatically fill in the gap and know whats going on without a second guess. i do agree the windows may be a little dark but i think that theres enough in the original unedited pic that more definition can be brought out if you redid the edit.

#1 is great because the waves of light do indeed draw you straight into the car. there is movement coming in from the left, hitting the car, and then bouncing off to the right. isnt that what you want a great photograph to do? move the viewers eye through the picture? i think if you rolled the car into the light, the composition would have been more stagnant and symmetrical (regardless if you used the 1/3rd rule) as the light would have framed in the car a little too perfectly. sure you would have gained more exposure but i think here in this case the choice of composition over that was a better choice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chixwithtrix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
51 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Austin
     
Feb 28, 2008 13:58 |  #14

JustinL wrote in post #5013779 (external link)
IF it really bothered you, you can always try to use a reflector to gain the definition back on the tires. The rear shows up somewhat from the tire shine that was used.

Is that your wagon?

No, the car is actually my boyfriend's. I'm the one who got him into Subarus originally, unfortunately he is getting ready to sell this baby for a more fuel efficient car. Glad I got a chance to play around with it though!


RCTV Productions (external link)
Photo: 30D + kit lens, Canon 100-400mm. Video: Canon XL2
Me (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goatydude
Senior Member
528 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Sale, Vic, Australia
     
Feb 28, 2008 17:35 as a reply to  @ chixwithtrix's post |  #15

Awsome, you definately have a talent for this style of photography.

Pics 1 and 2 are my favorites caught my eye straight away and have kept me coming back for another look.

What post processing did you do?


www.gippslandimages.co​m.au (external link)

1dmk4 1dmk2 50d 70-200 2.8L 17-40 f4L 50 2.5 100 2.8 macro, 28 1.8 and the rest.....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,470 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Subaru love
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Transportation 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is icebergchick
1154 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.