chixwithtrix wrote in post #5013655
Good catch, thanks! Honestly I think that was because of my tunnel vision sticking with the interesting graphic of the light dipping back behind the car. I doubt that the wheel wells would gain much definition with the way the lights were positioned, but the mid section of the car would definitely benefit from it.
I think both ways would work, in the 1st photo having the darker area on the center pops the more important (or at least more graphical/definable) front and rear of the it and pulls your eye along the car. With the car in full light would give a better overall picture and get some interesting light play on the entire car that would be fun to work with.
Thanks for all of the comments everyone, keep 'em coming!
agreed. no need to care about those wheel well definitions, its not like your minds eye cant automatically fill in the gap and know whats going on without a second guess. i do agree the windows may be a little dark but i think that theres enough in the original unedited pic that more definition can be brought out if you redid the edit.
#1 is great because the waves of light do indeed draw you straight into the car. there is movement coming in from the left, hitting the car, and then bouncing off to the right. isnt that what you want a great photograph to do? move the viewers eye through the picture? i think if you rolled the car into the light, the composition would have been more stagnant and symmetrical (regardless if you used the 1/3rd rule) as the light would have framed in the car a little too perfectly. sure you would have gained more exposure but i think here in this case the choice of composition over that was a better choice.