Why not get the Leica as well? I don't see anything wrong with shooting more than one system. They have different strengths. The question is; can you remember all the buttons & dials?
Feb 28, 2008 15:40 | #31 Why not get the Leica as well? I don't see anything wrong with shooting more than one system. They have different strengths. The question is; can you remember all the buttons & dials? Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cybnew Goldmember  2,010 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: Cayucos California, Seattle, The Arctic Circle More info | Feb 28, 2008 15:42 | #32 "I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened. " Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SlowBlink "I like dog butts"  1,926 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Vancouver B.C. More info | Feb 28, 2008 16:16 | #33 Well I'm not angry as much as disappointed, very disappointed... K, I'm fine now so lets some pics! Rob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DVS_WiNdz Cream of the Crop 9,835 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: New York, NY More info | Feb 28, 2008 16:42 | #34 |
DVS_WiNdz Cream of the Crop 9,835 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: New York, NY More info | Feb 28, 2008 16:43 | #35 |
CurtisN Master Flasher  19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Feb 28, 2008 18:00 | #36 scot079 wrote in post #5014192  Would love an in-depth D3 review from a high end Canon shooter ... but just because you own a high-end Canon doesn't make you a high-end Canon shooter. It just means you're a guy with a high-end Canon. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kblair210 Senior Member  517 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Clearwater, FL More info | Feb 28, 2008 18:07 | #37 |
txduggan Goldmember  1,005 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Fishkill, NY, Hudson Valley, NY More info | Feb 28, 2008 18:24 | #38 kblair210 wrote in post #5015933 We have found a witch. May we burn him? How do you know he is a witch? He bought a Nikon. Right! Yeah! Yeah! Burn him! Ni! And how do you know he's a witch? Gear: Yes - Rides quads really slow - Likes shiny things...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RichNY Goldmember  1,817 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2006 More info | Feb 28, 2008 18:32 | #39 cosworth wrote in post #5014573 I expect you to immediately rent a 200 f/2 VR adn tell me if it's a bad ass combo. I have been tempted recently to rent this with a D3 and shoot for a day. Mark doesn't need to rent a 200 f/2 VR as he can borrow mine any time he wants to. Truth be told he purchased his D3 within a week of shooting with the 200 f/2 VR Yes, teh same lens from Canon will be avilable soon and I already own a Canon, but it would be nice to see what I could get with it. For the price of Canon's 200 f/2 you can get the Nikon with a D300 as an extra body and still have $200 left over for a nice bottle of wine. High ISO comparison is demanded between your two bodies ASAP. Don't do it Mark- there is enough of a D3 shortage already Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cosworth I'm comfortable with my masculinity  10,939 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Duncan, BC, Canada More info | Feb 28, 2008 20:25 | #40 RichNY wrote in post #5016105 For the price of Canon's 200 f/2... We all know it will retail for close to the Nikon's price. Just like the 300 2.8 IS does. people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 28, 2008 20:28 | #41 Wow, I'm taking a much bigger beating than even I expected. And Loving every minute of it.  1/8000s f/2.8 at 14.0mm iso200 hide exif Full EXIF Info Date/Time 28-Feb-2008 13:57:51 Make Nikon Model NIKON D3 Flash Used No Focal Length 14 mm Exposure Time 1/8000 sec Aperture f/2.8 ISO Equivalent 200 Exposure Bias White Balance Metering Mode matrix (5) JPEG Quality Exposure Program aperture priority (3) Focus Distance
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DVS_WiNdz Cream of the Crop 9,835 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: New York, NY More info |
-MasterChief- - B E L I E V E -  3,188 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2006 Location: Requiem More info | Feb 28, 2008 20:38 | #43 hey MDJAK, i think a Mark III vs D3 shootout is at hand!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 28, 2008 20:40 | #44 haven't really had a lot of time with it. Only got it on Tuesday.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 28, 2008 20:47 | #45 another quickie:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 991 guests, 145 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
